Integrated design of a telerobotic workstation

The experiments described in this paper are part of a larger joint MIT/NASA research effort that focuses on the development of a methodology for designing and evaluating integrated interfaces for highly dexterous and multifunctional telerobots. Specifically, a telerobotic workstation is being designed for an Extravehicular Activity (EVA) anthropomorphic space station telerobot. Previous researchers have designed telerobotic workstations based upon performance of discrete subsets of tasks (for example, peg-in-hole, tracking, etc.) without regard for transitions that operators go through between tasks performed sequentially in the context of larger integrated tasks. The exploratory research experiments presented here took an integrated approach and assessed how subjects operating a full-immersion telerobot perform during the transitions between sub-tasks of two common EVA tasks. Preliminary results show that up to 30% of total task time is spent gaining and maintaining Situation Awareness (SA) of their task space and environment during transitions. Although task performance improves over the two trial days, the percentage of time spent on SA remains the same. This method identifies areas where workstation displays and feedback mechanisms are most needed to increase operator performance and decrease operator workload—areas that previous research methods have not been able to address.

[1]  David J. Homan,et al.  An integrated EVA/RMS virtual reality simulation, including force feedback for astronaut training , 1996 .

[2]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Space teleoperation through time delay: review and prognosis , 1993, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[3]  Nicholas J. M Patrick Design, construction, and testing of a fingertip tactile display for interaction with virtual and remote environments , 1990 .

[4]  Homayoon Kazerooni,et al.  Case Study on Haptic Devices: Human-Induced Instability in Powered Hand Controllers , 1995 .

[5]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Telerobotics, Automation, and Human Supervisory Control , 2003 .

[6]  Grigore C. Burdea,et al.  Force and Touch Feedback for Virtual Reality , 1996 .

[7]  Mark Edward Vidov Visual interface issues in a virtual environment for space teleoperation , 1993 .

[8]  Geb Thomas,et al.  Virtual Tools for Supervisory and Collaborative Control of Robots , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[9]  Susumu Tachi Tele-existence and/or cybernetic interface studies in Japan , 1991 .

[10]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Sensory Substitution for Force Feedback in Teleoperation , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[11]  Lawrence W. Stark,et al.  Some of what one needs to know about using head-mounted displays to improve teleoperator performance , 1993, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[12]  Michael James Massimino Effects of force and visual feedback on space teleoperation : with policy implications , 1988 .