The effects of eye fixation and stimulus and response location on the contingent negative variation (CNV).

[1]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Habituation: a model phenomenon for the study of neuronal substrates of behavior. , 1966, Psychological review.

[2]  J. L. Myers.  Fundamentals of Experimental Design , 1972 .

[3]  H. Fruhstorfer.  Habituation and dishabituation of the human vertex response. , 1971, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[4]  M. Low,et al.  Surface‐negative, slow‐potential shift associated with conditioning in man , 1966, Neurology.

[5]  W G Walter,et al.  The effects of attention and distraction on the contingent negative variation in normal and neurotic subjects. , 1968, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  P. Obrist,et al.  The physiological concomitants of reaction time performance as a function of preparatory interval and preparatory interval series. , 1970, Psychophysiology.

[7]  E. N. Sokolov,et al.  Perception and the Conditioned Reflex , 1965 .

[8]  M. Low,et al.  The CNV and semantic content of stimuli in the experimental paradigm: effects of feedback. , 1971, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[9]  Walter Wg,et al.  Slow potential changes in the human brain associated with expectancy, decision and intention. , 1967 .

[10]  J. Tecce.  Contingent negative variation (CNV) and psychological processes in man. , 1972, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  J. Bevan.  The human auditory evoked response and contingent negative variation in hyperbaric air. , 1971, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  P. Lang,et al.  Cortical slow-wave and cardiac rate responses in stimulus orientation and reaction time conditions. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Eye movement artifact in the CNV. , 1970, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.