Intentions in the Brain

Is it possible to understand the intentions of others by merely observing their movements? Current debate has been mainly focused on the role that mirror neurons and motor simulation may play in this process, with surprisingly little attention being devoted to how intentions are actually translated into movements. Here, we delineate an alternative approach to the problem of intention-from-movement understanding, which takes “action execution” rather than “action observation” as a starting point. We first consider whether and to what extent, during action execution, intentions shape movement kinematics. We then examine whether observers are sensitive to intention information conveyed by visual kinematics and can use this information to discriminate between different intentions. Finally, we consider the neural mechanisms that may contribute to intention-from-movement understanding. We argue that by reframing the relationship between intention and movement, this evidence opens new perspectives into the neurobiology of how we know other minds and predict others’ behavior.

[1]  K. Verfaillie,et al.  Time Will Show: Real Time Predictions during Interpersonal Action Perception , 2013, PloS one.

[2]  U. Castiello,et al.  The case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde: A kinematic study on social intention , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[3]  U. Castiello,et al.  Both your intention and mine are reflected in the kinematics of my reach-to-grasp movement , 2008, Cognition.

[4]  N. Holmes,et al.  To eat or not to eat? Kinematics and muscle activity of reach-to-grasp movements are influenced by the action goal, but observers do not detect these differences , 2013, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  J. Searle Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind , 1983 .

[6]  R. Lemon,et al.  What We Know Currently about Mirror Neurons , 2013, Current Biology.

[7]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Beyond grasping: Representation of action in human anterior intraparietal sulcus , 2007, NeuroImage.

[8]  D. Pandya,et al.  Parietal, temporal, and occipita projections to cortex of the superior temporal sulcus in the rhesus monkey: A retrograde tracer study , 1994, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[9]  B. Abernethy,et al.  Probing expert anticipation with the temporal occlusion paradigm: experimental investigations of some methodological issues. , 2005, Motor control.

[10]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  Social grasping: From mirroring to mentalizing , 2012, NeuroImage.

[11]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Parietal Lobe: From Action Organization to Intention Understanding , 2005, Science.

[12]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Predictive coding: an account of the mirror neuron system , 2007, Cognitive Processing.

[13]  Vic Braden,et al.  Recognising the Style of Spatially Exaggerated Tennis Serves , 2001, Perception.

[14]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Constraints on human arm movement trajectories. , 1987, Canadian journal of psychology.

[15]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Understanding Actions of Others: The Electrodynamics of the Left and Right Hemispheres. A High-Density EEG Neuroimaging Study , 2010, PloS one.

[16]  A. Murata,et al.  Largely segregated parietofrontal connections linking rostral intraparietal cortex (areas AIP and VIP) and the ventral premotor cortex (areas F5 and F4) , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Online prediction of others’ actions: the contribution of the target object, action context and movement kinematics , 2012, Psychological research.

[18]  Karl Verfaillie,et al.  Perception of biological motion: A stimulus set of human point-light actions , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[19]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  Detecting deception in a bluffing body: The role of expertise , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[20]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  Recognizing people from their movement. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  U. Castiello,et al.  Cues to intention: The role of movement information , 2011, Cognition.

[22]  M. Santello,et al.  Effects of end-goal on hand shaping. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  B. Abernethy,et al.  Pickup of Essential Kinematics Underpins Expert Perception of Movement Patterns , 2007, Journal of motor behavior.

[24]  Francesca Ugolotti Serventi,et al.  Ventral premotor and inferior parietal cortices make distinct contribution to action organization and intention understanding. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[25]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  The motor theory of social cognition: a critique , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  James M. Kilner,et al.  More than one pathway to action understanding , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  U. Castiello,et al.  Does the intention to communicate affect action kinematics? , 2009, Consciousness and Cognition.

[28]  C. Armbrüster,et al.  Movement planning in prehension: do intended actions influence the initial reach and grasp movement? , 2006, Motor control.

[29]  Pierre Jacob,et al.  How from action-mirroring to intention-ascription? , 2013, Consciousness and Cognition.

[30]  J. Montepare,et al.  Impressions of people created by age-related qualities of their gaits. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  Leonardo Fogassi,et al.  Neurophysiological bases underlying the organization of intentional actions and the understanding of others’ intention , 2013, Consciousness and Cognition.

[32]  R. Blake,et al.  Perception of human motion. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[33]  A. Goldman,et al.  Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  Cristina Becchio,et al.  Communicative Interactions Improve Visual Detection of Biological Motion , 2011, PloS one.

[35]  M. Iacoboni,et al.  Getting a grip on other minds: Mirror neurons, intention understanding, and cognitive empathy , 2006, Social Neuroscience.

[36]  K. Ochsner,et al.  The Need for a Cognitive Neuroscience of Naturalistic Social Cognition , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[37]  J. Searle Intentionality: Name index , 1983 .

[38]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Grasping the Intentions of Others with One's Own Mirror Neuron System , 2005, PLoS biology.

[39]  G. Johansson Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[40]  D. Perrett,et al.  Responses of Anterior Superior Temporal Polysensory (STPa) Neurons to Biological Motion Stimuli , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[41]  B. Abernethy,et al.  Expertise and Attunement to Kinematic Constraints , 2008, Perception.

[42]  Marco Santello,et al.  The effects of task and content on digit placement on a bottle , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[43]  R. Blake,et al.  Brain Areas Involved in Perception of Biological Motion , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[44]  K. Verfaillie,et al.  The Second-Agent Effect: Communicative Gestures Increase the Likelihood of Perceiving a Second Agent , 2011, PloS one.

[45]  G. Vingerhoets,et al.  Multifocal intraparietal activation during discrimination of action intention in observed tool grasping , 2010, Neuroscience.

[46]  J. Cutting,et al.  Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display , 1977 .

[47]  Frank E. Pollick,et al.  Neural Substrates for Action Understanding at Different Description Levels in the Human Brain , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[48]  Sonja Stork,et al.  Subsequent actions influence motor control parameters of a current grasping action , 2008, RO-MAN 2008 - The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[49]  A. Clark Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[50]  J. Montepare,et al.  Impressions of people created by age-related qualities of their gaits. , 1988 .

[51]  Cristina Becchio,et al.  Inferring intentions from biological motion: A stimulus set of point-light communicative interactions , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[52]  Luca Turella,et al.  An object for an action, the same object for other actions: effects on hand shaping , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[53]  Peter Neri,et al.  Meaningful interactions can enhance visual discrimination of human agents , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[54]  L. Fogassi,et al.  Selectivity for grip type and action goal in macaque inferior parietal and ventral premotor grasping neurons. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[55]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The mirror-neuron system: a Bayesian perspective. , 2007, Neuroreport.

[56]  U. Castiello,et al.  Modulation of the action control system by social intention: unexpected social requests override preplanned action. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[57]  A. Young,et al.  Emotion Perception from Dynamic and Static Body Expressions in Point-Light and Full-Light Displays , 2004, Perception.

[58]  V. Manera,et al.  Cooperation or competition? Discriminating between social intentions by observing prehensile movements , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.