Various aspects of F-wave values in a healthy population

OBJECTIVE To characterize various aspects of F-wave in a healthy population and establish normative data for future clinical use. METHODS A total of 100 healthy volunteers underwent sensory and motor nerve conduction studies of the ulnar and tibial nerves, including F waves elicited by 32 stimuli. RESULTS The F-wave measurements (mean +/- SD for ulnar vs tibial nerve) consisted of persistence (83 +/- 19 vs 97 +/- 5%), minimum, mean and maximum latencies (26.5 +/- 2.1, 28.1 +/- 2.2, and 30.4 +/- 2.3 vs 47.0 +/- 4.1, 49.6 +/- 4.4, and 52.5 +/- 4.4 ms), minimum, mean and maximum F-wave conduction velocities (FWCV) (55.0 +/- 2.7, 60.0 +/- 2.3, and 64.0 +/- 3.0 vs 49.0 +/- 2.9, 52.2 +/- 3.1, and 55.5 +/- 3.4 m/s), chronodispersion (3.9 +/- 0.9 vs 5.5 +/- 1.4 ms), mean amplitude (347 +/- 152 vs 384 +/- 148 microV) and mean duration (8.6 +/- 2.9 vs 13.0 +/- 4.5 ms). Additional measures, registered by electronic averaging, included latency (27.4 +/- 2.3 vs 48.6 +/- 4.7 ms), duration (9.6 +/- 2.2 vs 16.4 +/- 4.2 ms), and amplitude (299 +/- 156 vs 208 +/- 116 microV). CONCLUSIONS The use of a height nomogram serves well as an acceptable means to adjust F latencies for the limb length. In addition to the commonly used minimal latency, maximal FWCV, and persistence, clinically relevant measures with a narrow variability includes mean and maximal latencies, chronodispersion, and mean duration. In particular, mean latency obtained with 10 stimuli gave accurate results either for group or individual analysis. SIGNIFICANCE The data help establish an adequate manner of recording F-wave latencies in clinical evaluation.

[1]  C. Panayiotopoulos,et al.  F-wave studies on the deep peroneal nerve Part 2. — 1. Chronic renal failure 2. Limb-girdle muscular dystrophy , 1977, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[2]  M H Rivner,et al.  Influence of age and height on nerve conduction , 2001, Muscle & nerve.

[3]  M H Rivner,et al.  Toward more rational nerve conduction interpreations: The effect of height , 1990, Muscle & nerve.

[4]  R. Olney,et al.  The relative diagnostic sensitivity of different F‐wave parameters in various polyneuropathies , 1992, Muscle & nerve.

[5]  M. Fisher,et al.  Normative F wave values and the number of recorded F waves , 1994, Muscle & nerve.

[6]  B. Shahani,et al.  Late responses as aids to diagnosis in peripheral neuropathy. , 1980, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[7]  J. Kimura.  Long and short of nerve conduction measures: reproducibility for sequential assessments , 2001, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[8]  Frank Weber,et al.  The diagnostic sensitivity of different F wave parameters , 1998, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[9]  L. C. Ward,et al.  Nerve conduction velocity varies inversely with height , 1981, Muscle & nerve.

[10]  J. Kimura,et al.  F-wave latency serves as the most reproducible measure in nerve conduction studies of diabetic polyneuropathy: multicentre analysis in healthy subjects and patients with diabetic polyneuropathy , 2000, Diabetologia.

[11]  C. Panayiotopoulos,et al.  F-waves in clinical neurophysiology: a review, methodological issues and overall value in peripheral neuropathies. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  Morris A. Fisher,et al.  F response latency determination , 1982 .

[13]  Morris A. Fisher,et al.  The contemporary role of F‐wave studies: F‐wave studies: Clinical utility , 1998, Muscle & nerve.

[14]  Jun Kimura,et al.  Electrodiagnosis in Diseases of Nerve and Muscle: Principles and Practice , 1983 .

[15]  J. Kimura,et al.  F-wave conduction velocity in the central segment of the peroneal and tibial nerves. , 1975, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  B. Fierro,et al.  Analysis of F‐wave in metabolic neuropathies: a comparative study in uremic and diabetic patients , 1987, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[17]  M. Zwarts,et al.  Special Nerve Conduction Techniques , 2004 .

[18]  M H Rivner,et al.  The contemporary role of F‐wave studies: F‐wave studies: Limitations , 1998, Muscle & nerve.

[19]  J Kimura,et al.  F‐wave velocity in the central segment of the median and ulnar nerves , 1974, Neurology.

[20]  C P Panayiotopoulos,et al.  NOTES AND NEW DEVELOPMENTS , 2004 .

[21]  D. Burke,et al.  Motoneuron excitability and the F wave , 2003, Muscle & nerve.

[22]  M. Fisher.  AAEM minimonograph #13: H reflexes and F waves: Physiology and clinical indications , 1992, Muscle & nerve.

[23]  E Chroni,et al.  The importance of sample size for the estimation of F wave latency parameters in the peroneal nerve. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[24]  J A Nobrega,et al.  Sample size and the study of F waves , 1999, Muscle & nerve.

[25]  Erik Stålberg,et al.  Reference values of F wave parameters in healthy subjects , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[26]  Magladery Jw,et al.  Electrophysiological studies of nerve and reflex activity in normal man. I. Identification of certain reflexes in the electromyogram and the conduction velocity of peripheral nerve fibers. , 1950 .

[27]  P. Fawcett,et al.  F-responses: a study of frequency, shape and amplitude characteristics in healthy control subjects. , 1985, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.