A Formal Framework for Conceptions of Sustainability – a Theoretical Contribution to the Discourse in Sustainable Development

In the sustainability discourse we find much disagreement about the idea of sustainability resulting in the unsatisfactory situation that this idea is limited by arbitrariness and therefore looses its action guiding power. Examining various strategies to solve this challenge we argue for a meta-perspective. In the central part of this paper we describe a formal framework for conceptions of sustainability consisting of fundamental and practical modules. Subsequently, we critically compare this framework with alternative meta-approaches, in particular with the ‘Framework for Strategic Sustainable Development’. We conclude that the problem of arbitrariness is encountered on three different levels; in the designation of the subject field of the sustainability debate, in the characterisation of sustainability science and indirectly in providing a basis to assess policies. This underlines the framework's usefulness of structuring the discourse on sustainability. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

[1]  W. Ascher.  Policy sciences contributions to analysis to promote sustainability , 2007 .

[2]  R. Ayres,et al.  Production, Consumption, and Externalities , 1969 .

[3]  Fridolin S. Brand,et al.  Building a "theory of sustainable development" : two salient conceptions within the German discourse , 2008 .

[4]  Andrew Dobson,et al.  Environment sustainabilities: An analysis and a typology , 1996 .

[5]  Ruediger Kuehr,et al.  Strategic sustainable development — selection, design and synergies of applied tools , 2002 .

[6]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Socioecological Transitions and Global Change , 2007 .

[7]  Paul Burger,et al.  Towards a capability approach of sustainability , 2011 .

[8]  R. Kasperson,et al.  Sustainability Science , 2019, Critical Skills for Environmental Professionals.

[9]  Jouni Korhonen,et al.  Industrial ecology in the strategic sustainable development model , 2004 .

[10]  Matthew Leach,et al.  Bridging the gaps between theory and practice: a service niche approach to urban sustainability indicators , 2008 .

[11]  G. Broman,et al.  Exploring the possibility of a systematic and generic approach to social sustainability , 2010 .

[12]  Rupert J. Baumgartner,et al.  Strategic thinking for sustainable development , 2010 .

[13]  Frank Boons,et al.  Industrial Ecology as a Cultural Phenomenon: On Objectivity as a Normative Position , 2000 .

[14]  Tomás B. Ramos,et al.  A framework for regional sustainability assessment: developing indicators for a Portuguese region , 2010 .

[15]  M. Keitsch.  Sustainability and science - challenges for theory and practice , 2010 .

[16]  R. Dunlap,et al.  A New Ecological Paradigm for Post-Exuberant Sociology , 1980 .

[17]  Karl-Henrik Robèrt,et al.  Tools and concepts for sustainable development, how do they relate to a general framework for sustainable development, and to each other? , 2000 .

[18]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes , 2009 .

[19]  Y. Kajikawa.  Research core and framework of sustainability science , 2008 .

[20]  John R. Ehrenfeld,et al.  Industrial ecology: A framework for product and process design , 1997 .

[21]  Pim Martens,et al.  Governance for sustainable development: a framework , 2008 .