Performance of Power Loom Textiles: A Resource-based View.

Despite increasing attention paid to the Resource-based View (RBV), there is a dearth of empirical evidence on the interactions among different RBV performance dimensions and their effect on organizational performance. This paper examines and to extend the literature, by obtaining an understanding of the link between resources, capabilities and organizational performance in terms of operational performance, financial performance and non financial performance by using a survey research in the framework of Resource-based View. The RBV involves the different performance dimensions such as tangible assets, intangible assets and capabilities. Numerous prior studies have sought to examine the links between resources and organizational performance in particular efficiency by secondary data and using quantitative methods. This paper involved a quantitative examination of the relationship between tangibles assets, intangibles assets and capabilities and organizational performance of power loom textiles of Maharashtra (India). The primary data of one hundred and sixty power loom textiles of Maharashtra is collected through questionnaire to examine the relationship between tangibles assets, intangibles assets and capabilities with the operational performance. It also examines the relationship between operational performance with the organizational performance. This study finds a positive relationship between performance dimensions and organizational performance. The hypotheses are developed in the framework of RBV and tested by using the statistical method. Among many developing countries that actively participate in textiles and apparel trade, the Indian textile industry is exhibiting significant growth potential in the global market with its advantage as low production costs, abundant resources of raw material and cheap labor forces. The textiles and apparel industry is India's second largest industry consists of spinning, apparel, garment and man-made fabrics manufacturing. The country is the largest exporter of terry towels and man-made textile products. However, with an increased level of competition from low cost manufacturers (especially China) around the world, the industry is under tremendous pressure to increase productivity, to improve performance, to improve production quality, and to advance the management systems. Furthermore, competition is much more intense in the textiles and apparel exports business after the quota cancellation as stated by Clark (2005). Therefore, it became crucial for textile product manufacturers to respond to the new challenges with new strategies and solutions. The power loom textile is one of the most important segments of the textile Industry in terms of fabric production and employment generation. It provides employment to 57.44 Lakh persons and contributes 62 percent of total cloth production in the Country. 60% of the fabrics produced in the power loom sector are of man-made. More than 60% of fabric meant for export is also sourced from power loom sector as mentioned in the Annual Report (2013), Textile Ministry, India. In the economic survey conducted by Government of India (2012-2013) states that, these power looms have flourished prominently at various centers in Maharashtra such as Bhiwandi, Ichalkaranji, Sholapur and Malegaon, these power loom centers work in decentralized sector and play an important role in the growth of power loom industry. India's textile and clothing industry contributes 4% per cent to Gross Domestic Product, 14 percent in industrial production, 18% of total industrial employment and 27% of export earnings. This power loom sector operates in Small to Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in India. However, the issue of concern here is the sustainability of this achieved competitiveness of the Indian firms. Under the changed scenario sans quota restrictions, firms in these economies are trying to expand their international market competitiveness through various strategies. These strategies involve a mix of productivity enhancing and cost minimizing activities (Zala, 2010). Bheda (2002) has stated that when the factors associated with productivity are reviewed; it becomes clear that most of the factors are of techno-managerial nature. The manufacturer can improve productivity performance substantially by implementing best practices in the area of operator and management training, industrial engineering, production planning and control, industrial relations and productivity related incentives. He further states that there are hundred percent chances for productivity performance improvement for average textile industry in India. The present research deals with effect of tangible, intangible assets and capabilities on operational performance of the power looms in Maharashtra state. It also deals with understanding the factors affecting the operational and organizational performance of power looms and attempts to use the available resources efficiently and effectively.

[1]  Cnrs Poitiers,et al.  g and p , 2012 .

[2]  Paul Hyland,et al.  A comparison of manufacturing technology adoption in SMEs and large companies. , 2003 .

[3]  لطیفی نژاد مرجان,et al.  An Introduction To Total Productive Maintenance(TPM) معرفی نگهداری و تعمیرات جامع , 2005 .

[4]  Ken Bowen,et al.  Messing About in Problems. An Informal Structured Approach to their Identification and Management , 1984 .

[5]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  RECONCEPTUALIZING THE EFFECTS OF LEAN ON PRODUCTION COSTS WITH EVIDENCE FROM THE F-22 PROGRAM , 2009 .

[6]  K. Kottawatta Impact of Attitudinal Factors on Job Performance of Executives and Non-Executive Employees in Apparel Industry in Sri Lanka , 2013 .

[7]  Charu Chandra,et al.  An application of a system analysis methodology to manage logistics in a textile supply chain , 2000 .

[8]  E. Shayan,et al.  Productivity gains by cellular manufacturing , 2002 .

[9]  Abu Bakar Sade,et al.  The influence of Flexible Manufacturing Technology adoption on productivity of Malaysian manufacturing industry , 2010 .

[10]  Charles Mbohwa,et al.  Availability Performance Improvement by Using Autonomous Maintenance - The Case of a Developing Country, Zimbabwe , 2013 .

[11]  Manoj Kumar Tiwari,et al.  Implementing the Lean Sigma framework in an Indian SME: a case study , 2006 .

[12]  K. Saravanan,et al.  A simulation-based analysis for improvement of productivity in sick chemical dyeing factory: a research article , 2011 .

[13]  L. Ganapathy,et al.  Analytic Hierarchical Process Based Prioritization of Performance Measures used by Power Loom Textiles. , 2014 .

[14]  Kit Fai Pun,et al.  Exploring soft versus hard factors for TQM implementation in small and medium‐sized enterprises , 2006 .

[15]  Masoud Rabbani,et al.  Productivity Engineering and Management , 2007 .

[16]  Õrjan Ljungberg,et al.  Measurement of overall equipment effectiveness as a basis for TPM activities , 1998 .

[17]  George Mathew,et al.  Study on Improving the Production Rate by Rapier Looms in Textile Industry , 2013 .

[18]  Rakhma Oktavina,et al.  Performance Improvement Modeling (Case Study : Micro and Small Enterprise) , 2010 .

[19]  Umit Bititci,et al.  Quantitative models for performance measurement system , 2000 .

[20]  Wuttigrai Ngamsirijit Manufacturing flexibility improvement and resource-based view: cases of automotive firms , 2011 .

[21]  S Shanmugasundaram,et al.  EMBRACING MANPOWER FOR PRODUCTIVITY IN APPAREL INDUSTRY , 2011 .

[22]  N. Gado,et al.  The Performance of Textile Companies in the North West Zone of Nigeria: the Role of Infrastructure as a Resource , 2012 .

[23]  William M. Mothersell,et al.  Hoshin Kanri planning: the system of five alignments behind the Toyota Production System , 2008 .

[24]  M. Bruce,et al.  Lean or agile: A solution for supply chain management in the textiles and clothing industry? , 2004 .

[25]  Antonio Facchetti,et al.  Organic semiconductors: Made to order. , 2013, Nature materials.

[26]  Richard A. Reid Productivity and quality improvement: an implementation framework , 2006 .

[27]  G. Karuppusami,et al.  Pareto analysis of critical success factors of total quality management: A literature review and analysis , 2006 .

[28]  L. Ganapathy,et al.  Prioritization of factors impacting on performance of power looms using AHP , 2014 .

[29]  Shaukat A. Brah,et al.  Relationship between total productive maintenance and performance , 2004 .

[30]  S. Thangavelu,et al.  Structural Change and Productivity Growth in the Japanese Manufacturing Industry , 2007 .

[31]  C. Sharma,et al.  Does export and productivity growth linkage exist? Evidence from the Indian manufacturing industry , 2011 .

[32]  Dayang Hasliza Muhd Yusuf,et al.  Factors Affecting Business Success of Small & Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in Thailand , 2011 .

[33]  Mathew Philip,et al.  Factors affecting business success of small & medium enterprises (SMEs) , 2010 .

[34]  P. G. Saleeshya,et al.  Lean manufacturing practices in textile industries – a case study , 2012 .

[35]  Latif Salum,et al.  The cellular manufacturing layout problem , 2000 .

[36]  S. R. Devadasan,et al.  Review and preview of productivity research and applications , 1997 .

[37]  D. Tripathi,et al.  A critical study of TQM and TPM approaches on business performance of Indian manufacturing industry , 2006 .

[38]  Stefan Tangen,et al.  An overview of frequently used performance measures , 2003 .

[39]  Alain Yee-Loong Chong,et al.  Can Malaysian firms improve organizational/innovation performance via SCM? , 2011, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[40]  Cengiz Haksever,et al.  Total Quality Management in the small business environment , 1996 .

[41]  E. Rauch,et al.  Implementation of Lean Production in Small Sized Enterprises , 2013 .

[42]  S. I. Salaheldin Critical success factors for TQM implementation and their impact on performance of SMEs , 2009 .

[43]  R. Bheda PRODUCTIVITY IN INDIAN APPAREL INDUSTRY: PARADIGMS AND PARAGONS , 2002 .

[44]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[45]  K. N. Marimuthu,et al.  Performance of Textile Industry in Tamil Nadu: Perspectives of General Manager , 2013 .

[46]  G. Chand,et al.  Implementation of TPM in cellular manufacture , 2000 .

[47]  L. Ganapathy,et al.  Quantification of Factors Influencing Productivity using AHP Technique: An Approach towards Productivity Improvement , 2014 .

[48]  K. Ng,et al.  Quality management practices in Malaysia: Perceived advancement in quality management and business performance , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation & Technology.

[49]  N. L. Hiregoudar,et al.  A Survey of TQM Practices in North Karnataka Manufacturing SMEs: an Empirical Evaluation , 2010 .

[50]  S. Dashkovskiy,et al.  Production Planning & Control , 2013 .

[51]  Li-Hsuan Huang,et al.  Does labour quality matter on productivity growth? The case of the Taiwanese manufacturing industry , 2008 .

[52]  Howard E. Van Auken,et al.  Innovation and performance in Spanish manufacturing SMEs , 2008 .

[53]  Andrew Thomas,et al.  Developing an SME based six sigma strategy , 2006 .

[54]  Riyad Eid,et al.  The implementation of world class manufacturing techniques in Egyptian manufacturing firms: An empirical study , 2007, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[55]  Kui-wai Li,et al.  Analyzing China's productivity growth: Evidence from manufacturing industries , 2012 .

[56]  William J. Jaffe,et al.  People and Productivity , 1963 .

[57]  Muhammad Usman Awan,et al.  Total quality management in developing countries: A case of pharmaceutical wholesale distribution in Pakistan , 2009 .

[58]  Nan Shing Ong Productivity improvements for a small “made‐to‐order” manufacturing environment , 1997 .

[59]  Amik Garg,et al.  TQM implementation, performance and firm profitability: A causal approach , 2013 .

[60]  S. A. Masood,et al.  Prioritization in Whole Business Process : A Case of Manufacturing Industry , 2013 .

[61]  Jae-Jun Kim,et al.  Labour productivity model for reinforced concrete construction projects , 2011 .