Configuring Action in Objects: From Mutual Space to Media Space

It has long been recognized that the material environment is an essential feature of the organization of social action and interaction. It is only recently, however, that we have witnessed a burgeoning body of empirical studies, from within both the social and cognitive sciences, that has begun to delineate the ways in which objects are socially constructed and feature in social relations and activities. Despite this growing interest in the object in social life, there remains a paucity of research concerned with how objects are reflexively constituted in and through social interaction. In this article, we consider how aspects of the material environment are rendered momentarily intelligible in and through interaction and the ways in which objects provide a resource for the recognition of the actions and activities of others. We examine interaction in both conventional working environments and new experimental spaces created through advanced telecommunication and communication technologies to reveal the ways in which the sense and significance of social actions and activities are embedded in, and inseparable from, the local ecology.

[1]  Christian Heath,et al.  Media Space and Communicative Asymmetries: Preliminary Observations of Video-Mediated Interaction , 1992, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[2]  J. Johnson Mixing Humans and Nonhumans Together: The Sociology of a Door-Closer , 1988 .

[3]  M. Bloor The Structures of the Life-World , 1975 .

[4]  Richard Harper,et al.  "What a f-ing system! Send 'em all to the same place and then expect us to stop 'em hitting": Making Technology Work in Air Traffic Control , 1993 .

[5]  H. Garfinkel Studies in Ethnomethodology , 1968 .

[6]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication (Learning in Doing: Social, , 1987 .

[7]  A. Schutz The Problem of Social Reality , 1996 .

[8]  Kari Kuutti,et al.  Identifying potential CSCW applications by means of activity theory concepts: a case example , 1992, CSCW '92.

[9]  Paolo Palladino THE RIGHT TOOLS FOR THE JOB - AT WORK IN 20TH-CENTURY LIFE SCIENCES - CLARKE,AE, FUJIMURA,JH , 1994 .

[10]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Developmental studies of work as a testbench of activity theory: The case of primary care medical practice , 1993 .

[11]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  One is not enough: multiple views in a media space , 1993, INTERCHI.

[12]  S. Woolgar,et al.  Representation in Scientific Practice , 1990 .

[13]  Steve Benford,et al.  Crowded collaborative virtual environments , 1997, CHI.

[14]  Donald MacKenzie,et al.  The social shaping of technology : how the refrigerator got its hum , 1985 .

[15]  B. Asher The Professional Vision , 1994 .

[16]  C. Goodwin,et al.  Seeing as a Situated Activity: Formulating Planes* , 1996 .

[17]  John A. Hughes,et al.  The Automation of Air Traffic Control , 1975, Journal of navigation.

[18]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Through the Interface: A Human Activity Approach To User Interface Design , 1990 .

[19]  B. Latour,et al.  Don't throw the baby out with the bath school! A reply to Collins and Yearley , 1992 .

[20]  Robert Liebendorfer Mind, self and society , 1960 .

[21]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Portholes: supporting awareness in a distributed work group , 1992, CHI.