Probabilistic Phonotactics and Neighborhood Activation in Spoken Word Recognition

Abstract Recent work (Vitevitch & Luce, 1998) investigating the role of phonotactic information in spoken word recognition suggests the operation of two levels of representation, each having distinctly different consequences for processing. The lexical level is marked by competitive effects associated with similarity neighborhood activation, whereas increased probabilities of segments and sequences of segments facilitate processing at the sublexical level. We investigated the two proposed levels in six experiments using monosyllabic and specially constructed bisyllabic words and nonwords. The results of these studies provide further support for the hypothesis that the processing of spoken stimuli is a function of both facilitatory effects associated with increased phonotactic probabilities and competitive effects associated with the activation of similarity neighborhoods. We interpret these findings in the context of Grossberg, Boardman, and Cohen's (1997) adaptive resonance theory of speech perception.

[1]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  William D Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech , 1978, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  Catherine O. Ringen,et al.  Vowel harmony : theoretical implications , 1975 .

[4]  John Kingston,et al.  Papers in Laboratory Phonology: Index of names , 1990 .

[5]  Ralph Penny,et al.  Syllable Structure and Stress in Spanish: A Non-Linear Analysis , 1985 .

[6]  J. Sawusch,et al.  Lexical neighborhood effects in phonetic processing. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  A. Samuel Does lexical information influence the perceptual restoration of phonemes , 1996 .

[8]  P. Luce,et al.  When Words Compete: Levels of Processing in Perception of Spoken Words , 1998 .

[9]  P. Luce,et al.  Retroactive influence of syllable neighborhoods , 1991 .

[10]  P. Luce,et al.  Spoken word recognition in older adults: Activation and decision , 1996 .

[11]  A. Baddeley,et al.  The phonological loop as a language learning device. , 1998, Psychological review.

[12]  M. S. Mayzner,et al.  The ranking of letter pairs and single letters to match digram and single-letter frequency counts , 1962 .

[13]  M. S. Mayzner,et al.  Tables of single-letter and digram frequency counts for various word-length and letter-position combinations. , 1965 .

[14]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Competition and segmentation in spoken word recognition , 1994, ICSLP.

[15]  D. Norris Shortlist: a connectionist model of continuous speech recognition , 1994, Cognition.

[16]  W. Levelt,et al.  Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? , 1994, Cognition.

[17]  P. Luce,et al.  Delayed commitment in spoken word recognition: Evidence from cross-modal priming , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  W Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Levels of perceptual representation and process in lexical access: words, phonemes, and features. , 1994, Psychological review.

[19]  Paul A. Luce,et al.  Effects of phonotactic probability on segmentation of words in continuous speech , 1996 .

[20]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Monitoring sentence comprehension , 1979 .

[21]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Access and integration: projecting sound onto meaning , 1989 .

[22]  P. Luce,et al.  Similarity neighborhoods of spoken two-syllable words: retroactive effects on multiple activation. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  S. Gathercole Is nonword repetition a test of phonological memory or long-term knowledge? It all depends on the nonwords , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[24]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants' sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language. , 1994 .

[25]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .

[26]  D. Massaro,et al.  Phonological constraints in speech perception , 1980 .

[27]  Daniel E. Gaygen,et al.  Effects of modality on subjective frequency estimates and processing of spoken and printed words , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  J Grainger,et al.  Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. , 1996, Psychological review.

[29]  S. Grossberg The Adaptive Self-Organization of Serial Order in Behavior: Speech, Language, And Motor Control , 1987 .

[30]  D. Massaro,et al.  Phonological context in speech perception , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  K. Zimmer A Note on Vowel Harmony , 1967, International Journal of American Linguistics.

[32]  J. Greenberg The Patterning of Root Morphemes in Semitic , 1950 .

[33]  R Ratcliff,et al.  A bias interpretation of facilitation in perceptual identification. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[34]  R. L. Trask,et al.  语音学和音系学词典 = A dictionary of phonetics and phonology , 1993 .

[35]  Theodore M. Lightner On the Description of Vowel and Consonant Harmony , 1965 .

[36]  Eileen C. Schwab,et al.  Pattern recognition by humans and machines , 1986 .

[37]  S Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of word recognition and recall: attentional priming, learning, and resonance. , 1986, Psychological review.

[38]  D. Kemmerer,et al.  Phonotactics and Syllable Stress: Implications for the Processing of Spoken Nonsense Words , 1997, Language and speech.

[39]  Erik Fudge,et al.  Branching structure within the syllable , 1987, Journal of Linguistics.

[40]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Finding Structure in Time , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[41]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of variable-rate speech categorization. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  D. Crystal,et al.  语言学和语音学基础词典 = A first dictionary of linguistics and phonetics , 1980 .

[43]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Merging phonetic and lexical information in phonetic decision-making , 2000 .

[44]  A. Baddeley,et al.  The influences of number of syllables and wordlikeness on children’s repetition of nonwords , 1991, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[45]  W. Cooper,et al.  Sentence Processing: Psycholinguistic Studies Presented to Merrill Garrett. , 1980 .

[46]  S. Goldinger,et al.  Only the Shadower knows: Comment on Hamburger and Slowiaczek (1996) , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[47]  Louisa M. Slowiaczek,et al.  Prelexical facilitation and lexical interference in auditory word recognition. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[48]  R. Treiman,et al.  Syllable Structure and the Distribution of Phonemes in English Syllables , 1997 .

[49]  M. Pitt,et al.  Is Compensation for Coarticulation Mediated by the Lexicon , 1998 .

[50]  S. Goldinger,et al.  Priming Lexical Neighbors of Spoken Words: Effects of Competition and Inhibition. , 1989, Journal of memory and language.

[51]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Lexical Representation and Process , 1989, Language.

[52]  S. Goldinger Signal detection comparisons of phonemic and phonetic priming: The flexible-bias problem , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[53]  Brian W. Eukel Phonotactic basis for word frequency effects: Implications for lexical distance metrics , 1980 .

[54]  G. Altmann Cognitive models of speech processing , 1991 .

[55]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Word length and the structure of short-term memory , 1975 .

[56]  Samuel Jay Keyser,et al.  CV Phonology: A Generative Theory of the Syllable , 1988 .

[57]  P. Luce,et al.  A computational analysis of uniqueness points in auditory word recognition , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[58]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[59]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and Performance VI , 1978 .

[60]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Recognizing Spoken Words: The Neighborhood Activation Model , 1998, Ear and hearing.

[61]  James W. Harris,et al.  Syllable Structure and Stress in Spanish: A Nonlinear Analysis , 1982 .

[62]  S. Goldinger,et al.  Phonetic priming, neighborhood activation, and PARSYN , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[63]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  English speakers' sensitivity to phonotactic patterns , 2000 .

[64]  S. Messer,et al.  Implicit phonology in children , 1967 .

[65]  J. Morais,et al.  Phonological priming between monosyllabic spoken words. , 1995 .

[66]  Donald C. Hildum,et al.  Expectancy and the perception of syllables. , 1956 .

[67]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants′ Sensitivity to the Sound Patterns of Native Language Words , 1993 .

[68]  T. Bever,et al.  Sensitivity to Phonological Universals in Children and Adolescents. , 1975 .

[69]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  The temporal structure of spoken language understanding , 1980, Cognition.

[70]  Kenneth I. Forster,et al.  No enemies in the neighborhood: absence of inhibitory neighborhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[71]  Donald J. Foss,et al.  Identifying the speech codes , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[72]  D. Norris,et al.  Competition in spoken word recognition: Spotting words in other words , 1994 .