The Key Events Dose-Response Framework: A Cross-Disciplinary Mode-of-Action Based Approach to Examining Dose-Response and Thresholds

The ILSI Research Foundation convened a cross-disciplinary working group to examine current approaches for assessing dose-response and identifying safe levels of intake or exposure for four categories of bioactive agents—food allergens, nutrients, pathogenic microorganisms, and environmental chemicals. This effort generated a common analytical framework—the Key Events Dose-Response Framework (KEDRF)—for systematically examining key events that occur between the initial dose of a bioactive agent and the effect of concern. Individual key events are considered with regard to factors that influence the dose-response relationship and factors that underlie variability in that relationship. This approach illuminates the connection between the processes occurring at the level of fundamental biology and the outcomes observed at the individual and population levels. Thus, it promotes an evidence-based approach for using mechanistic data to reduce reliance on default assumptions, to quantify variability, and to better characterize biological thresholds. This paper provides an overview of the KEDRF and introduces a series of four companion papers that illustrate initial application of the approach to a range of bioactive agents.

[1]  S. Cohen,et al.  Role of urinary physiology and chemistry in bladder carcinogenesis. , 1995, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[2]  Jennifer Seed,et al.  Overview: Using Mode of Action and Life Stage Information to Evaluate the Human Relevance of Animal Toxicity Data , 2005, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[3]  Alan R. Boobis,et al.  IPCS Framework for Analyzing the Relevance of a Cancer Mode of Action for Humans , 2006 .

[4]  R. Russell,et al.  Application of a Key Events Dose-Response Analysis to Nutrients: A Case Study with Vitamin A (Retinol) , 2009, Critical reviews in food science and nutrition.

[5]  K. P. Dubois,et al.  Studies on the toxicity and mechanism of action of p-nitrophenyl diethyl thionophosphate. , 1949, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[6]  J. Lucy,et al.  THE ACTION OF EXCESS OF VITAMIN A ALCOHOL ON THE FINE STRUCTURE OF RAT DERMAL FIBROBLASTS , 1966, The Journal of cell biology.

[7]  J. Haines,et al.  International programme on chemical safety , 1996, The Lancet.

[8]  J. M. Mansour,et al.  The relationship between inhibition of phosphofructokinase activity and the mode of action of trivalent organic antimonials on Schistosoma mansoni. , 1957, British journal of pharmacology and chemotherapy.

[9]  David Y. Lai,et al.  PPARα Agonist-Induced Rodent Tumors: Modes of Action and Human Relevance , 2003 .

[10]  James E Klaunig,et al.  The Human Relevance of Information on Carcinogenic Modes of Action: Overview , 2003, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[11]  Jennifer Seed,et al.  A Framework for Human Relevance Analysis of Information on Carcinogenic Modes of Action , 2003, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[12]  Steven K. Gibb Toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy. , 2008, Reproductive toxicology.

[13]  M Younes,et al.  IPCS conceptual framework for evaluating a mode of action for chemical carcinogenesis. , 2001, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[14]  C. H. Werkman,et al.  On the mode of action of penicillin. , 1946, Federation proceedings.

[15]  James E Klaunig,et al.  PPARalpha agonist-induced rodent tumors: modes of action and human relevance. , 2003, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[16]  J. Bailar,et al.  Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy , 2010, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews.

[17]  R. C. Whiting,et al.  The Key Events Dose-Response Framework: Its Potential for Application to Foodborne Pathogenic Microorganisms , 2009, Critical reviews in food science and nutrition.

[18]  R. O'brien,et al.  Mode of action of nicotine in the housefly , 1970 .

[19]  Carolyn Vickers,et al.  IPCS framework for analysing the relevance of a cancer mode of action for humans , 2006 .

[20]  R. Preston,et al.  Application of Key Events Analysis to Chemical Carcinogens and Noncarcinogens , 2009, Critical reviews in food science and nutrition.

[21]  Steve L. Taylor,et al.  The Key Events Dose-Response Framework: A Foundation for Examining Variability in Elicitation Thresholds for Food Allergens , 2009, Critical reviews in food science and nutrition.