Modular Quantum Information Processing by Dissipation

Dissipation can be used as a resource to control and simulate quantum systems. We discuss a modular model based on fast dissipation capable of performing universal quantum computation, and simulating arbitrary Lindbladian dynamics. The model consists of a network of elementary dissipation-generated modules and it is in principle scalable. In particular, we demonstrate the ability to dissipatively prepare all single qubit gates, and the CNOT gate; prerequisites for universal quantum computing. We also show a way to implement a type of quantum memory in a dissipative environment, whereby we can arbitrarily control the loss in both coherence, and concurrence, over the evolution. Moreover, our dissipation-assisted modular construction exhibits a degree of inbuilt robustness to Hamiltonian, and indeed Lindbladian errors, and as such is of potential practical relevance.

[1]  Paolo Zanardi,et al.  Dissipative universal Lindbladian simulation , 2015, 1506.04311.

[2]  Victor V. Albert,et al.  Geometry and Response of Lindbladians , 2015, 1512.08079.

[3]  E. Villaseñor,et al.  Stabilizing coherence with nested environments: a numerical study using kicked Ising models , 2015, 1512.07683.

[4]  Zhong-Xiao Man,et al.  Cavity-based architecture to preserve quantum coherence and entanglement , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[5]  John M. Martinis,et al.  Quantum theory of a bandpass Purcell filter for qubit readout , 2015, 1504.06030.

[6]  P. Zanardi,et al.  Geometry, robustness, and emerging unitarity in dissipation-projected dynamics , 2014, 1412.6198.

[7]  P. Zanardi,et al.  Coherent quantum dynamics in steady-state manifolds of strongly dissipative systems. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[8]  T. Monz,et al.  An open-system quantum simulator with trapped ions , 2011, Nature.

[9]  Ny,et al.  Quantum process tomography of a universal entangling gate implemented with Josephson phase qubits , 2009, 0910.1118.

[10]  P. Zoller,et al.  Preparation of entangled states by quantum Markov processes , 2008, 0803.1463.

[11]  Daniel A. Lidar,et al.  Adiabaticity in open quantum systems , 2007, 1508.05558.

[12]  Daniel A. Lidar,et al.  Adiabatic quantum computation in open systems. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[13]  S. Lloyd,et al.  Topological protection and quantum noiseless subsystems. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[14]  Andrew M. Childs,et al.  Robustness of adiabatic quantum computation , 2001, quant-ph/0108048.

[15]  M. A. Rowe,et al.  A Decoherence-Free Quantum Memory Using Trapped Ions , 2001, Science.

[16]  Viola,et al.  Theory of quantum error correction for general noise , 1996, Physical review letters.

[17]  Institute for Scientific Interchange Foundation,et al.  Stabilizing quantum information , 1999, quant-ph/9910016.

[18]  Daniel A. Lidar,et al.  Decoherence-Free Subspaces for Quantum Computation , 1998, quant-ph/9807004.

[19]  P. Zanardi,et al.  Noiseless Quantum Codes , 1997, quant-ph/9705044.

[20]  Gottesman,et al.  Class of quantum error-correcting codes saturating the quantum Hamming bound. , 1996, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[21]  Ergodic theorems for semigroups of positive operators , 1977 .