Incremental, Predictive Parsing with Psycholinguistically Motivated Tree-Adjoining Grammar
暂无分享,去创建一个
Frank Keller | Vera Demberg | Alexander Koller | Frank Keller | Alexander Koller | V. Demberg | Vera Demberg
[1] William Schuler,et al. Broad-Coverage Parsing Using Human-Like Memory Constraints , 2010, CL.
[2] Aravind K. Joshi,et al. Incremental LTAG Parsing , 2005, HLT/EMNLP.
[3] Frank Keller,et al. Cognitively Plausible Models of Human Language Processing , 2010, ACL.
[4] Julie C. Sedivy,et al. Subject Terms: Linguistics Language Eyes & eyesight Cognition & reasoning , 1995 .
[5] Frank Keller,et al. A Psycholinguistically Motivated Version of TAG , 2008, TAG.
[6] Aravind K. Joshi,et al. Tree Adjunct Grammars , 1975, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..
[7] David M. Magerman. Statistical Decision-Tree Models for Parsing , 1995, ACL.
[8] Frank Keller,et al. The use of verb-specific information for prediction in sentence processing , 2013 .
[9] David M. Magerman. Natural Language Parsing as Statistical Pattern Recognition , 1994, ArXiv.
[10] Christoph Scheepers,et al. Integration of Syntactic and Semantic Information in Predictive Processing: Cross-Linguistic Evidence from German and English , 2003, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[11] Adrian Staub,et al. Eye movements and processing difficulty in object relative clauses , 2010, Cognition.
[12] Wolfgang Menzel,et al. Incremental Parsing and the Evaluation of Partial Dependency Analyses , 2011 .
[13] D. Barr,et al. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.
[14] C. Clifton,et al. Syntactic prediction in language comprehension: evidence from either...or. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[15] Philip Resnik,et al. Probabilistic Tree-Adjoining Grammar as a Framework for Statistical Natural Language Processing , 1992, COLING.
[16] Frank Keller,et al. Data from eye-tracking corpora as evidence for theories of syntactic processing complexity , 2008, Cognition.
[17] Stefan L. Frank,et al. Surprisal-based comparison between a symbolic and a connectionist model of sentence processing , 2009 .
[18] Frank Keller,et al. Syntactic and Semantic Factors in Processing Difficulty: An Integrated Measure , 2010, ACL.
[19] Aravind K. Joshi,et al. Feature Structures Based Tree Adjoining Grammars , 1988, COLING.
[20] Thorsten Brants,et al. TnT – A Statistical Part-of-Speech Tagger , 2000, ANLP.
[21] D. Bates,et al. Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .
[22] Richard L. Lewis,et al. An Activation-Based Model of Sentence Processing as Skilled Memory Retrieval , 2005, Cogn. Sci..
[23] Mark Steedman,et al. The syntactic process , 2004, Language, speech, and communication.
[24] Brian Roark,et al. Incremental Parsing with the Perceptron Algorithm , 2004, ACL.
[25] Douglas Roland,et al. Discourse Expectations and Relative Clause Processing. , 2012 .
[26] Philip Resnik,et al. Left-Corner Parsing and Psychological Plausibility , 1992, COLING.
[27] E. Gibson. Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies , 1998, Cognition.
[28] S. Shieber,et al. 40 40 08 v 1 2 6 A pr 1 99 4 Principles and Implementation of Deductive Parsing , .
[29] Vera Demberg-Winterfors,et al. Broad-coverage model of prediction in human sentence processing , 2010 .
[30] Brian Roark,et al. Probabilistic Top-Down Parsing and Language Modeling , 2001, CL.
[31] Vijay K. Shanker,et al. Towards efficient statistical parsing using lexicalized grammatical information , 2002 .
[32] James R. Curran,et al. Adding Noun Phrase Structure to the Penn Treebank , 2007, ACL.
[33] Daniel Gildea,et al. The Proposition Bank: An Annotated Corpus of Semantic Roles , 2005, CL.
[34] Colin M. Brown,et al. Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[35] A. Kennedy,et al. Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading , 2005, Vision Research.
[36] Ian H. Witten,et al. The zero-frequency problem: Estimating the probabilities of novel events in adaptive text compression , 1991, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.
[37] Dan Klein,et al. Improved Inference for Unlexicalized Parsing , 2007, NAACL.
[38] Vincenzo Lombardo,et al. Processing Coordinated Structures: Incrementality and Connectedness , 2005, Cogn. Sci..
[39] E. Gibson. The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. , 2000 .
[40] Aravind K. Joshi,et al. Tree-adjoining grammars and lexicalized grammars , 1992, Tree Automata and Languages.
[41] G. Altmann,et al. Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference , 1999, Cognition.
[42] P. Frasconi,et al. Learning first-pass structural attachment preferences with dynamic grammars and recursive neural networks , 2003, Cognition.
[43] Nick Cercone,et al. Computational Linguistics , 1986, Communications in Computer and Information Science.
[44] Brian Roark,et al. Deriving lexical and syntactic expectation-based measures for psycholinguistic modeling via incremental top-down parsing , 2009, EMNLP.
[45] Srinivas Bangalore,et al. Supertagging: An Approach to Almost Parsing , 1999, CL.
[46] Stephen T. Wu,et al. Complexity Metrics in an Incremental Right-Corner Parser , 2010, ACL.
[47] Vincenzo Lombardo,et al. Dynamic TAG and Lexical Dependencies , 2007 .
[48] Benjamin W. Tatler,et al. Systematic tendencies in scene viewing , 2008 .
[49] Vera Demberg,et al. German and English Treebanks and Lexica for Tree-Adjoining Grammars , 2012, LREC.
[50] Michael Dixon,et al. Compose-Reduce Parsing , 1991, ACL.
[51] Joakim Nivre,et al. Incrementality in Deterministic Dependency Parsing , 2004 .
[52] Yasuyoshi Inagaki,et al. Stochastically Evaluating the Validity of Partial Parse Trees in Incremental Parsing , 2004, ACL 2004.
[53] Michael Collins,et al. Head-Driven Statistical Models for Natural Language Parsing , 2003, CL.
[54] Masaya Yoshida,et al. Predictive processing of syntactic structure: Sluicing and ellipsis in real-time sentence processing , 2013 .
[55] Reinhold Kliegl,et al. Parsing costs as predictors of reading difficulty: An evaluation using the Potsdam Sentence Corpus , 2008, Journal of Eye Movement Research.
[56] Mark Steedman,et al. CCGbank: A Corpus of CCG Derivations and Dependency Structures Extracted from the Penn Treebank , 2007, CL.
[57] M. Tanenhaus,et al. Modeling the Influence of Thematic Fit (and Other Constraints) in On-line Sentence Comprehension , 1998 .
[58] Vera Demberg,et al. Incremental Derivations in CCG , 2012, TAG.
[59] Frank Keller,et al. A Computational Model of Prediction in Human Parsing: Unifying Locality and Surprisal Effects , 2009 .
[60] Fei Xia,et al. A Uniform Method of Grammar Extraction and Its Applications , 2000, EMNLP.
[61] L Konieczny,et al. Locality and Parsing Complexity , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[62] Anoop Sarkar,et al. Applying Co-Training Methods to Statistical Parsing , 2001, NAACL.
[63] Michael White,et al. Better Surface Realization through Psycholinguistics , 2014, Lang. Linguistics Compass.
[64] David Chiang,et al. Statistical Parsing with an Automatically-Extracted Tree Adjoining Grammar , 2000, ACL.
[65] Roger Levy,et al. Sequential vs. Hierarchical Syntactic Models of Human Incremental Sentence Processing , 2012, CMCL@NAACL-HLT.
[66] John Hale,et al. A Probabilistic Earley Parser as a Psycholinguistic Model , 2001, NAACL.
[67] Masaya Yoshida,et al. Incremental Processing of Coreference and Binding in Japanese , 2009 .