On Latent Fingerprint Image Quality

Latent fingerprints which are lifted from surfaces of objects at crime scenes play a very important role in identifying suspects in the crime scene investigations. Due to poor quality of latent fingerprints, automatic processing of latents can be extremely challenging. For this reason, latent examiners need to be involved in latent identification. To expedite the latent identification and alleviate subjectivity and inconsistency in latent examiners’ feature markups and decisions, there is a need to develop latent fingerprint identification systems that can operate in the “lights-out” mode. One of the most important steps in “lights-out” systems is to determine the quality of a given latent to predict the probability that the latent can be identified in a fully automatic manner. In this paper, we (i) propose a definition of latent value determination as a way of establishing the quality of latents based on a specific matcher’s identification performance, (ii) define a set of features based on ridge clarity and minutiae and evaluate them based on their capability to determine if a latent is of value for individualization or not, and (iii) propose a latent fingerprint image quality (LFIQ) that can be useful to reject the latents which cannot be successfully identified in the “lights-out” mode. Experimental results show that the most salient latent features include the average ridge clarity and the number of minutiae. The proposed latent quality measure improves the rank-100 identification rate from 69 % to 86 % by rejecting 50 % of latents deemed as poor quality. In addition, the rank-100 identification is 80 % when rejecting 80 % of the latents in the databases assessed as ‘NFIQ = 5’; however, the same identification rate can be achieved by rejecting only 21 % of the latents with low LFIQ.

[1]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Handbook of Fingerprint Recognition, Second Edition , 2009 .

[2]  Craig I. Watson,et al.  Fingerprint Vendor Technology Evaluation 2003: Summary of Results and Analysis Report , 2004 .

[3]  Document # 10 Standards for Examining Friction Ridge Impressions and Resulting Conclusions ( Latent / Tenprint , 2011 .

[4]  David R. Ashbaugh,et al.  Quantitative-Qualitative Friction Ridge Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Ridgeology , 1999 .

[5]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Latent Fingerprint Matching Using Descriptor-Based Hough Transform , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[6]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Latent Palmprint Matching , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[7]  R. A. Hicklin,et al.  Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  LFIQ: Latent fingerprint image quality , 2013, 2013 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS).

[9]  Wei-Yin Loh,et al.  Classification and regression trees , 2011, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..

[10]  V. N. Dvornychenko Evaluation of fusion methods for latent fingerprint matchers , 2012, 2012 5th IAPR International Conference on Biometrics (ICB).

[11]  Josef Bigün,et al.  Local Features for Enhancement and Minutiae Extraction in Fingerprints , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[12]  Elham Tabassi,et al.  Fingerprint Image Quality , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[13]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Latent Fingerprint Matching , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[14]  Law. Policy Executive Summary of the National Academies of Science Reports, Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward , 2009 .

[15]  Michael D. Garris,et al.  NIST Special Database 27 Fingerprint Minutiae From Latent and Matching Tenprint Images , 2000 .

[16]  R. A. Hicklin,et al.  ELFT-EFS Evaluation of Latent Fingerprint Technologies: Extended Feature Sets [Evaluation #2] , 2011 .

[17]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Handbook of Fingerprint Recognition , 2005, Springer Professional Computing.

[18]  尚弘 島影 National Institute of Standards and Technologyにおける超伝導研究及び生活 , 2001 .

[19]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Latent Fingerprint Matching Using Descriptor-Based Hough Transform , 2013, IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur..

[20]  C. Barden,et al.  Proficiency Testing Trends Following the 2009 National Academy of Sciences Report, “Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward” , 2016 .

[21]  R. A. Hicklin,et al.  Repeatability and Reproducibility of Decisions by Latent Fingerprint Examiners , 2012, PloS one.

[22]  George W. Quinn,et al.  ELFT phase II :: an evaluation of automated latent fingerprint identification technologies , 2009 .