Asymmetry Degree as a Tool for Comparing Interestingness Measures in Decision Making: The Case of Bayesian Confirmation Measures

Bayesian Confirmation Measures are used to assess the degree to which an evidence E supports or contradicts a conclusion H, making use of prior probability P(H), posterior probability P(H|E) and of probability of evidence P(E). Many confirmation measures have been defined till now, their use being motivated in different ways depending on the framework. Comparisons of those measures have already been made but there is an increasing interest for a deeper investigation of relationships, differences and properties. Here we focus on symmetry properties of confirmation measures which are partly inspired by classical geometric symmetries. Measures which do not satisfy a specific symmetry condition may present a different level of asymmetry: we define an asymmetry measure, some examples of its evaluation providing a practical way to appraise the asymmetry degree for Bayesian Confirmation Measures that allows to uncover some of their features, similarities and differences.

[1]  Vincenzo Crupi,et al.  On Bayesian Measures of Evidential Support: Theoretical and Empirical Issues* , 2007, Philosophy of Science.

[2]  Branden Fitelson The Plurality of Bayesian Measures of Confirmation and the Problem of Measure Sensitivity , 1999, Philosophy of Science.

[3]  Roberto Festa,et al.  Towards a Grammar of Bayesian Confirmation , 2009 .

[4]  Karl Friedrich Siburg,et al.  Symmetry of functions and exchangeability of random variables , 2011 .

[5]  Andrea Ellero,et al.  Monotonicity and Symmetry of IFPD Bayesian Confirmation Measures , 2016, MDAI.

[6]  David H. Glass,et al.  Entailment and symmetry in confirmation measures of interestingness , 2014, Inf. Sci..

[7]  E. Eells,et al.  Symmetries and Asymmetries in Evidential Support , 2002 .

[8]  N. Rescher A Theory of Evidence , 1958, Philosophy of Science.

[9]  Radko Mesiar,et al.  How non-symmetric can a copula be? , 2006 .

[10]  L. Stein,et al.  Probability and the Weighing of Evidence , 1950 .

[11]  Rudolf Carnap,et al.  Logical foundations of probability , 1951 .

[12]  Robert Susmaga,et al.  Can interestingness measures be usefully visualized? , 2015, Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci..

[13]  Howard J. Hamilton,et al.  Interestingness measures for data mining: A survey , 2006, CSUR.

[14]  Emilio Celotto,et al.  Visualizing the behavior and some symmetry properties of Bayesian confirmation measures , 2017, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.

[15]  Robert Susmaga,et al.  The Property of $\chi^2_{01}$ -Concordance for Bayesian Confirmation Measures , 2013, MDAI.

[16]  Branden Fitelson,et al.  Likelihoodism, Bayesianism, and relational confirmation , 2007, Synthese.

[17]  Salvatore Greco,et al.  Properties of rule interestingness measures and alternative approaches to normalization of measures , 2012, Inf. Sci..

[18]  Halina Mortimer,et al.  The logic of induction , 1988 .

[19]  Zdzisław Pawlak,et al.  Can Bayesian confirmation measures be useful for rough set decision rules? , 2004, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[20]  H. Finch,et al.  Confirming Power of Observations Metricized for Decisions among Hypotheses , 1960, Philosophy of Science.

[21]  J. Kemeny,et al.  Degree of Factual Support , 1952, Philosophy of Science.

[22]  Gregor N. F. Weiß,et al.  An Order of Asymmetry in Copulas, and Implications for Risk Management , 2016 .

[23]  Tobias Bjerregaard,et al.  A survey of research and practices of Network-on-chip , 2006, CSUR.