Epidemiology of dependence on illicit substances, with a special focus on opioid dependence, in the State of Punjab, India: Results from two different yet complementary survey methods.

BACKGROUND We used two different yet complementary methods to capture the 'hidden population' of illicit substance users in the state of Punjab, India: Rapid Assessment Survey (RAS) and Punjab Drug Use Monitoring Survey (P-DUMS). METHODOLOGY For the RAS component, following a pilot study, Respondent Driven Sampling was used to recruit 6600 community-dwelling substance dependent persons aged 11-60 years from all the 22 districts of Punjab. Size was estimated using benchmark-multiplier method, and prevalence was calculated by projecting these data to the source population. For the P-DUMS component, data were collected on 7421 inpatients from 75 government de-addiction centres from 19 districts of Punjab. RESULTS Subjects In both RAS and P-DUMS were primarily opioid dependent (88% in RAS and 83% in P-DUMS). Heroin (inhaled/injected) emerged as the commonest opioid in both RAS (46%) and P-DUMS (52%), though 30.5% of the RAS sample also used the prescription opioid tramadol. Using the benchmark-multiplier method, 0.27 million (2.5% of the source population) were estimated to be opioid dependent, of which nearly 78,000 (0.7% of the source population) were injecting opioid users (IDUs), predominantly heroin (62%) but also buprenorphine (32.5%). High-risk behaviour was reported by nearly 60% of IDUs. Only 14% of the RAS sample had ever visited any de-addiction centre, and only 2.8% individuals had been admitted to a de-addiction centre in the past year. CONCLUSION There is a substantive problem of opioid dependence in this difficult-to-reach population of Punjab, with low treatment access. Misuse of prescription opioids along with IDU also raises concern.

[1]  R. Kumar,et al.  High Risk Behaviors of Injecting Drug Users (IDUs) in Chandigarh , 2015 .

[2]  D. Basu,et al.  Changing pattern of substance abuse in patients attending a de-addiction centre in north India (1978-2008) , 2012, The Indian journal of medical research.

[3]  Crime. Regional Office for South Asia The extent, pattern and trends of drug abuse in India : national survey , 2004 .

[4]  D. Heckathorn,et al.  Extensions of Respondent-Driven Sampling: A New Approach to the Study of Injection Drug Users Aged 18–25 , 2002, AIDS and Behavior.

[5]  Douglas D. Heckathorn,et al.  Implementation and Analysis of Respondent Driven Sampling: Lessons Learned from the Field , 2006, Journal of Urban Health.

[6]  B. Friedland,et al.  Characteristics of Female Sex Workers in Southern India Willing and Unwilling to Participate in a Placebo Gel Trial , 2013, AIDS and Behavior.

[7]  M. Rubio‐Stipec,et al.  The Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST): development, reliability and feasibility. , 2002, Addiction.

[8]  D. Basu,et al.  EPIDEMIOLOGY OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE IN INDIA : METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES , 1999, Indian journal of psychiatry.

[9]  J. Hargreaves,et al.  Sample Size Calculations for Population Size Estimation Studies Using Multiplier Methods With Respondent-Driven Sampling Surveys , 2017, JMIR public health and surveillance.

[10]  H. Whiteford,et al.  The Global Burden of Disease projects: what have we learned about illicit drug use and dependence and their contribution to the global burden of disease? , 2014, Drug and alcohol review.

[11]  Poonam Rani,et al.  Pattern and prevalence of substance use and dependence in the Union Territory of Chandigarh: Results of a rapid assessment survey , 2017, Indian journal of psychiatry.

[12]  N. Nebhinani,et al.  Tramadol Dependence: A Case Series from India , 2012, Indian journal of psychological medicine.

[13]  Douglas D. Heckathorn,et al.  Respondent-driven sampling : A new approach to the study of hidden populations , 1997 .

[14]  P. Reuter World drug report , 1998 .

[15]  Poonam Rani,et al.  Epidemiology of substance use and dependence in the state of Punjab, India: Results of a household survey on a statewide representative sample. , 2018, Asian journal of psychiatry.

[16]  Douglas D. Heckathorn,et al.  Comment: Snowball versus Respondent-Driven Sampling , 2011 .