Simulation-Based Assessment of Managerial Competence: Reliability and Validity.

Prior work based on complexity theory has attempted, with some success, to predict general and managerial performance in complex, uncertain, and fluid task settings. The present paper evaluates a quasi-experimental simulation technique that was specifically designed to measure the impact of individual differences in a number of managerial styles (including a style reflecting cognitive complexity) on executive performance. Twenty simulation-based measures were tested for reliability and validity. On the basis of the data obtained from two separate samples, it was concluded that this quasi-experimental simulation technology may be useful for assessing a number of managerial styles that are not currently tapped by other measurement methods. Research results reported in this paper, as well as results obtained in other concurrent efforts, are summarized.

[1]  S. Streufert,et al.  Training for Cognitive Complexity , 1987 .

[2]  Robert W. Swezey,et al.  Data Collection via a Quasi-Experimental Simulation Technology. III. Factor Structure and Validity , 1986 .

[3]  R. S. Corteen,et al.  The Role of Integrative Complexity in Military Leadership: Robert E. Lee and His Opponents1 , 1986 .

[4]  Robert W. Swezey,et al.  Complexity, managers, and organizations , 1986 .

[5]  P. Herriot,et al.  Group decision making in an assessment centre , 1985 .

[6]  B. Gunter,et al.  Patterns of television viewing and of perceptions of hazards to life , 1985 .

[7]  C. Russell.  Individual Decision Processes in an Assessment Center , 1985 .

[8]  M. Niehoff.  Assessment Centers: , 1983 .

[9]  Robert W. Swezey,et al.  Simulation and Related Research Methods in Environmental Psychology , 1982 .

[10]  C. Hale.  Cognitive complexity‐simplicity as a determinant of communication effectiveness , 1980 .

[11]  E. E. Jones,et al.  Polarized appraisals of out-group members. , 1980 .

[12]  Hal W. Hendrick,et al.  Differences in group problem-solving behavior and effectiveness as a function of abstractness. , 1979 .

[13]  W. A. Scott,et al.  Cognitive Structure, Theory and Measurement of Individual Differences , 1979 .

[14]  R. Mizerski.  Causal Complexity: A Measure of Consumer Causal Attribution , 1978 .

[15]  S. Streufert,et al.  Behavior in the complex environment. , 1978 .

[16]  Peter Suedfeld,et al.  Integrative Complexity of Communications in International Crises , 1977 .

[17]  P. Suedfeld,et al.  Revolutionary leaders: Long-term success as a function of changes in conceptual complexity. , 1976 .

[18]  Elliott Jaques,et al.  A General Theory of Bureaucracy , 1976 .

[19]  S. Streufert.  Complexity and complex decision making: Convergences between differentiation and intergration approaches to the prediction of task performance ☆ , 1970 .

[20]  S. Streufert,et al.  THE EFFECT OF CONCEPTUAL STRUCTURE, FAILURE, AND SUCCESS ON ATTRIBUTION OF CAUSALITY AND INTERPERSONAL ATTITUDES. , 1969 .

[21]  M. Driver,et al.  Impression Formation As A Measure of The Complexity of Conceptual Structure1 , 1967 .

[22]  H. Lamm,et al.  Information search as a function of conceptual structure in a complex problem-solving task. , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  Conceptual structure, communicator importance, and interpersonal attitudes toward conforming and deviant group members. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  P. Suedfeld,et al.  Conceptual structure, information search, and information utilization. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  M. Driver,et al.  Conceptual structure, information load and perceptual complexity , 1965 .

[26]  P. Suedfeld.  Conceptual Structure and Subjective Stress in Sensory Deprivation , 1964, Perceptual and motor skills.

[27]  P. Suedfeld.  ATTITUDE MANIPULATION IN RESTRICTED ENVIRONMENTS. I. CONCEPTUAL STRUCTURE AND RESPONSE TO PROPAGANDA. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[28]  P. Suedfeld,et al.  ATTITUDE MANIPULATION IN RESTRICTED ENVIRONMENTS , 1964 .