Are preschoolers sensitive to configural information in faces?

Several researchers have proposed that developmental improvements in children's face recognition abilities might reflect an increasing reliance on configural information (i.e. spatial relations between features) in faces (Carey & Diamond, 1994; Mondloch, Le Grand & Maurer, 2002). We investigated 4- and 5-year-olds' use of configural information for upright and inverted faces using Tanaka and Sengco's (1997) configural change paradigm. Participants saw a photograph of a child's face (e.g. Luke). Memory for features (e.g. Luke's mouth) was then tested in a face with the same configuration as the study face (e.g. Luke's face), in a face with a novel spatial configuration (e.g. Luke's face with the eyes shifted further apart), and presented on their own (e.g. Luke's mouth alone). We found that preschoolers and adults recognized target features from upright faces better when tested in the context of a face with the same configuration as the study face, than when they were embedded in a face with a new spatial configuration or when they were presented in isolation. This effect was lost when faces were inverted. The results suggest that adult-like styles of face processing are present from 4 years of age.

[1]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[2]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Holistic Processing of Faces in Preschool Children and Adults , 2003, Psychological science.

[3]  S. de Schonen,et al.  Effect of visual experience on face processing: a developmental study of inversion and non-native effects. , 2004, Developmental science.

[4]  Gillian Rhodes,et al.  What's lost in inverted faces? , 1993, Cognition.

[5]  R. Joseph,et al.  Holistic and part-based face recognition in children with autism. , 2003, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[6]  D. Maurer,et al.  Configural Face Processing Develops more Slowly than Featural Face Processing , 2002, Perception.

[7]  David K. A. Barnes,et al.  correction: Early visual experience and face processing , 2001, Nature.

[8]  Leslie B. Cohen,et al.  Do 7-month-old infants process independent features or facial configurations? , 2001 .

[9]  D. Maurer,et al.  The many faces of configural processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  J. Stigler,et al.  Does recognition memory improve with age , 1981 .

[11]  Gillian Rhodes,et al.  Expert face coding: Configural and component coding of own-race and other-race faces , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[12]  V. Bruce,et al.  Testing face processing skills in children , 2000 .

[13]  G. Schwarzer Processing of facial and non-facial visual stimuli in 2–5-year-old children , 2002 .

[14]  A. Freire,et al.  Face recognition in 4- to 7-year-olds: processing of configural, featural, and paraphernalia information. , 2001, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[15]  Chiara Turati,et al.  Evidence of the Face Inversion Effect in 4-Month-Old Infants. , 2004, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[16]  Michael L. Peterson,et al.  Perception of Faces, Objects, and Scenes: Analytic and Holistic Processes (335-355) , 2006 .

[17]  E. McKone,et al.  Early maturity of face processing in children: Local and relational distinctiveness effects in 7-year-olds , 2003 .

[18]  S. Carey Becoming a face expert. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[19]  O. Pascalis,et al.  Recognition of faces of different species: a developmental study between 5 and 8 years of age , 2001 .

[20]  L. Thompson,et al.  Infants attend to second-order relational properties of faces , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[21]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  The development of face expertise , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[22]  J. Tanaka,et al.  Features and their configuration in face recognition , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[23]  Y. Lacasse,et al.  From the authors , 2005, European Respiratory Journal.

[24]  G. Pike,et al.  Developmental Changes in the Effect of Inversion: Using a Picture Book to Investigate Face Recognition , 2001, Perception.

[25]  Hervé Abdi,et al.  What Are the Routes to Face Recognition , 2003 .

[26]  James W. Tanaka,et al.  Face recognition in young children : When the whole is greater than the sum of its parts , 1998 .

[27]  D. Maurer,et al.  Neuroperception: Early visual experience and face processing , 2001, Nature.

[28]  D. Maurer,et al.  Why 8-year-olds cannot tell the difference between Steve Martin and Paul Newman: factors contributing to the slow development of sensitivity to the spacing of facial features. , 2004, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[29]  S. Carey,et al.  From piecemeal to configurational representation of faces. , 1977, Science.

[30]  S. Carey,et al.  Are faces perceived as configurations more by adults than by children , 1994 .

[31]  V. Bruce,et al.  Local and Relational Aspects of Face Distinctiveness , 1998, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.