Checklist for the evaluation of research articles.

Critical reviews of biomedical and health research literature indicate that a substantial proportion of articles contain sufficient statistical and/or methodological mistakes to cast doubts on the stated conclusions. A checklist was developed to assist physicians and other health care professionals in posing appropriate questions when reading or reviewing research articles. The checklist covers four study designs, experimental or quasi-experimental designs, survey or cross-sectional studies, retrospective medical record reviews and case control studies.

[1]  S. Schor,et al.  Statistical evaluation of medical journal manuscripts. , 1966, JAMA.

[2]  S M Gore,et al.  Misuse of statistical methods: critical assessment of articles in BMJ from January to March 1976. , 1977, British medical journal.

[3]  S. B. Friedman,et al.  What's the difference? Pediatric residents and their inaccurate concepts regarding statistics. , 1981, Pediatrics.

[4]  J. D. Emerson,et al.  Use of statistical analysis in the New England Journal of Medicine. , 1983, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  R. Badgley,et al.  An assessment of research methods reported in 103 scientific articles from two Canadian medical journals. , 1961, Canadian Medical Association journal.

[6]  A. Herxheimer,et al.  Assessing Reports of Therapeutic Trials , 1970, British journal of pharmacology.

[7]  G. W. Brown,et al.  A classification of original articles. AJDC 1983 and 1984. , 1986, American journal of diseases of children.

[8]  R. Durant How do we improve the quality of research in adolescent health? A program for reviewing new investigators' research proposals. , 1991, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[9]  O B ROSS,et al.  Use of controls in medical research. , 1951, Journal of the American Medical Association.

[10]  H. Schoolman,et al.  Statistics in medical research: principles versus practices. , 1968, The Journal of laboratory and clinical medicine.

[11]  R. Fletcher,et al.  Clinical research in general medical journals: a 30-year perspective. , 1979, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  S. Glantz Biostatistics: how to detect, correct and prevent errors in the medical literature. , 1980, Circulation.