Developing a research framework for complex multi–team coordination in emergency management

This conceptual paper addresses previous calls for the development of new theoretical frameworks to better account for the multi–agency emergency management coordination required in complex events. It uses, as a departure point, a teamwork model that includes four phases: situation assessment; plan formulation, plan execution and team learning. The thesis put forward here is that we need to move the focus of analysis beyond the team to one of multi–layered multiple team and multiple organisation systems. To further develop this research framework indicators from multi–organisational literature are added to those found in the individual and teamwork literature to develop a more comprehensive account of multi–team multi–organisational coordination. The paper identifies key anchor points for future use in data collection.

[1]  Ove Njå,et al.  A discussion of decision making applied in incident command , 2009 .

[2]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams , 2006, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[3]  D. Paton,et al.  Developing disaster management capability: an assessment centre approach , 2002 .

[4]  E. Salas,et al.  Markers for enhancing team cognition in complex environments: the power of team performance diagnosis. , 2007, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[5]  Tammy L. Rapp,et al.  Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the Future , 2008 .

[6]  C. Wise,et al.  Organizing for Homeland Security after Katrina: Is Adaptive Management What’s Missing? , 2006 .

[7]  M. Lindell,et al.  Emergency Planning , 2006 .

[8]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  Hierarchical task analysis vs. cognitive work analysis: comparison of theory, methodology and contribution to system design , 2010 .

[9]  J. Dawson,et al.  Boundary spanners' identification, intergroup contact, and effective intergroup relations , 2006 .

[10]  C R Paris,et al.  Teamwork in multi-person systems: a review and analysis , 2000, Ergonomics.

[11]  D. Paton Disaster relief work: An assessment of training effectiveness , 1994 .

[12]  Heather A. Priest,et al.  Errors in the Heat of Battle: Taking a Closer Look at Shared Cognition Breakdowns Through Teamwork , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[13]  Jody Hoffer Gittell,et al.  Relationships and Resilience , 2008 .

[14]  Anne E. Black,et al.  Career stages in wildland firefighting: implications for voice in risky situations , 2011 .

[15]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  What really is going on? Review of situation awareness models for individuals and teams , 2008 .

[16]  J. Porac,et al.  Cognition and Communication at Work , 1999 .

[17]  Richard D. Gilson Special Issue Preface , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[18]  Kathleen M. Sutcliffe,et al.  The impact of safety organizing, trusted leadership, and care pathways on reported medication errors in hospital nursing units. , 2007, Medical care.

[19]  Jeanne-Marie Guise,et al.  Teamwork in obstetric critical care. , 2008, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[20]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. , 2000, Ergonomics.

[21]  Karlene H. Roberts,et al.  The Incident Command System : High Reliability Organizing for Complex and Volatile Task , 2007 .

[22]  C. Folke,et al.  Navigating social–ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change: Fikret Berkes, Johan Colding and Carl Folke (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, 2003. xxi + 393 pages. ISBN 0-521-81592-4 (hardback), £65 , 2004 .

[23]  Leslie A. DeChurch,et al.  Perspectives: Teams Won’t Solve This Problem , 2010, Hum. Factors.

[24]  M. Cole,et al.  Mind, culture, and activity : seminal papers from the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition , 1997 .

[25]  William E. Blanton,et al.  The Fifth Dimension: Application of Cultural-Historical Activity Theory, Inquiry-Based Learning, Computers, and Telecommunications to Change Prospective Teachers' Preconceptions , 2001 .

[26]  Leslie D. Lutz,et al.  Incident Command System as a Response Model within Emergency Operation Centers During Hurricane Rita , 2008 .

[27]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .

[28]  Ingrid M. Nembhard,et al.  Making It Safe: The Effects of Leader Inclusiveness and Professional Status on Psychological Safety and Improvement Efforts in Health Care Teams , 2006 .

[29]  Yrjö Engeström,et al.  Expansive Visibilization of Work: An Activity-Theoretical Perspective , 1999, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[30]  Kon Shing Kenneth Chung,et al.  Measuring Performance of Knowledge-Intensive Workgroups through Social Networks , 2009 .

[31]  Jane V. Wheeler,et al.  Managing from the boundary: The effective leadership of self-managing work teams , 2003 .

[32]  Eric Anthony Day,et al.  Relationships among team ability composition, team mental models, and team performance. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[33]  J. Mathieu,et al.  The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[34]  Ambre Brizon,et al.  The life cycle of weak signals related to safety , 2009 .

[35]  K. Weick,et al.  Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. , 1993 .

[36]  L. Weingart,et al.  Representational gaps, information processing, and conflict in functionally diverse teams , 2007 .

[37]  Susan Pascoe,et al.  The 2009 Victorian Bushfires Royal Commission final report , 2010 .

[38]  Susannah B. F. Paletz,et al.  The Breakdown of Coordinated Decision Making in Distributed Systems , 2010, Hum. Factors.

[39]  Andrew Hamilton,et al.  A review of emergency organisations - The need for a theoretical framework , 2010 .

[40]  Gail Wrogemann Intergroup relations in organisations , 2002 .