In this paper we evaluate the impact of two state- of-the-art offline signature verification systems which are based on local and global features, respectively. It is important to take into account the real world needs of Forensic Handwriting Examiners (FHEs). In forensic scenarios, the FHEs have to make decisions not only about forged and genuine signatures but also about disguised signatures, i.e., signatures where the authentic author deliberately tries to hide his/her identity with the purpose of denial at a later stage. The disguised signatures play an important role in real forensic cases but are usually neglected in recent literaure. This is the novelty of our study and the topic of this paper, i.e., investigating the performance of automated systems on disguised signatures. Two robust offline signature verification systems are slightly improved and evaluated on publicly available data sets from previous signature verification competitions. The ICDAR 2009 offline signature verification competition dataset and the ICFHR 2010 4NSigComp signatures dataset. In our experiments we observed that global features are capable of providing good results if only a detection of genuine and forged signatures is needed. Local features, however, are much better suited to solve the forensic signature verification cases when disguised signatures are also involved. Noteworthy, the system based on local features could outperform all other participants at the ICFHR 4NSigComp 2010. Keywords-signature verification, mixture models, forgeries, disguised signatures, forensic handwriting analysis
[1]
Marcus Liwicki,et al.
A writer identification system for on-line whiteboard data
,
2008,
Pattern Recognit..
[2]
Sargur N. Srihari,et al.
On-Line and Off-Line Handwriting Recognition: A Comprehensive Survey
,
2000,
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..
[3]
Samy Bengio,et al.
A comparative study of adaptation methods for speaker verification
,
2002,
INTERSPEECH.
[4]
Horst Bunke,et al.
Using a Statistical Language Model to Improve the Performance of an HMM-Based Cursive Handwriting Recognition System
,
2001,
Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell..
[5]
Marcus Liwicki,et al.
Forensic Signature Verification Competition 4NSigComp2010 - Detection of Simulated and Disguised Signatures
,
2010,
2010 12th International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition.
[6]
Luc Van Gool,et al.
Speeded-Up Robust Features (SURF)
,
2008,
Comput. Vis. Image Underst..
[7]
Réjean Plamondon,et al.
Automatic signature verification and writer identification - the state of the art
,
1989,
Pattern Recognit..
[8]
Giuseppe Pirlo,et al.
Automatic Signature Verification: The State of the Art
,
2008,
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).
[9]
DR. DARAMOLA SAMUEL,et al.
Novel Feature ExtractionTechnique For Off-LineSignature Verification System
,
2010
.
[10]
V. L. Blankers,et al.
ICDAR 2009 Signature Verification Competition
,
2009,
ICDAR.