Possible malfunction in widely used methane sampler deserves attention but poses limited implications for supply chain emission estimates

Estimates of methane emissions from natural gas production sites in the United States based on recent studies have been questioned due to possible malfunction of the Bacharach Hi Flow® Sampler (BHFS), the primary measurement instrument used for two out of five source types examined in those studies (equipment leaks and chemical injection pumps). Without assessing whether the BHFS malfunction occurred in those studies, we constrain the possible underestimation of emissions associated with the BHFS-based results by excluding potentially affected measurements. Assuming leak emission rates are similar for sites with low and high methane content, U.S. methane emissions from equipment leaks and chemical injection pumps in recent studies could be underestimated by up to 40–80% due to a malfunctioning BHFS. We discuss uncertainties associated with this estimate. While a 40–80% underestimation is important when characterizing individual source categories, the potential implications are attenuated when aggregating emissions across the five sources examined in the recent studies (<12–24%), across all sources in the natural gas production segment (<7–14%), or across the entire supply chain (<2–5%). Therefore, potential errors caused by BHFS malfunction in recent studies would not substantially alter estimates of methane emissions from the U.S. natural gas supply chain. The possible malfunction of such a widely-used instrument deserves further attention to ensure that its use in quantifying emissions from individual supply chain components is not compromised.

[1]  Eben D Thoma,et al.  Assessment of methane emissions from oil and gas production pads using mobile measurements. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  James Thomas,et al.  Measurements of methane emissions at natural gas production sites in the United States , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Matt Harrison,et al.  Response to comment on "Methane emissions from process equipment at natural gas production sites in the United States: pneumatic controllers". , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  S. Hamburg,et al.  Super-emitters in natural gas infrastructure are caused by abnormal process conditions , 2017, Nature Communications.

[5]  Daniel Zavala-Araiza,et al.  Toward a Functional Definition of Methane Super-Emitters: Application to Natural Gas Production Sites. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  Touché Howard,et al.  Comment on "Methane emissions from process equipment at natural gas production sites in the United States: pneumatic controllers". , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  Xin Lan,et al.  Characterizing Fugitive Methane Emissions in the Barnett Shale Area Using a Mobile Laboratory. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  Barbara Zielinska,et al.  Air impacts of increased natural gas acquisition, processing, and use: a critical review. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  Anthony J. Marchese,et al.  Measurements of methane emissions from natural gas gathering facilities and processing plants: measurement methods , 2014 .

[10]  Tracy R Tsai,et al.  Measuring emissions from oil and natural gas well pads using the mobile flux plane technique. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  Allen L Robinson,et al.  Methane Emissions from Conventional and Unconventional Natural Gas Production Sites in the Marcellus Shale Basin. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  M. R. Harrison,et al.  Estimate of methane emissions from the U.S. natural gas industry. , 1997, Chemosphere.

[13]  Matthew P Fraser,et al.  Methane emissions from process equipment at natural gas production sites in the United States: liquid unloadings. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  Matthew P Fraser,et al.  Methane emissions from process equipment at natural gas production sites in the United States: pneumatic controllers. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  Eben D Thoma,et al.  Assessment of volatile organic compound and hazardous air pollutant emissions from oil and natural gas well pads using mobile remote and on-site direct measurements , 2015, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[16]  Anthony J. Marchese,et al.  Reconciling divergent estimates of oil and gas methane emissions , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Adam R. Brandt,et al.  Aerial Surveys of Elevated Hydrocarbon Emissions from Oil and Gas Production Sites. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  E. Kort,et al.  Methane Leaks from North American Natural Gas Systems , 2014, Science.

[19]  Touché Howard,et al.  University of Texas study underestimates national methane emissions at natural gas production sites due to instrument sensor failure , 2015 .

[20]  Daniel Zimmerle,et al.  Measurements of methane emissions from natural gas gathering facilities and processing plants: measurement methods , 2014 .

[21]  Don W. Green,et al.  Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook , 2007 .

[22]  Mark S. Zahniser,et al.  Mobile Laboratory Observations of Methane Emissions in the Barnett Shale Region. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  Daniel Zimmerle,et al.  Methane emissions from natural gas compressor stations in the transmission and storage sector: measurements and comparisons with the EPA greenhouse gas reporting program protocol. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.