Muscarinic Receptors as Model Targets and Antitargets for Structure-Based Ligand Discovery

G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) regulate virtually all aspects of human physiology and represent an important class of therapeutic drug targets. Many GPCR-targeted drugs resemble endogenous agonists, often resulting in poor selectivity among receptor subtypes and restricted pharmacologic profiles. The muscarinic acetylcholine receptor family exemplifies these problems; thousands of ligands are known, but few are receptor subtype–selective and nearly all are cationic in nature. Using structure-based docking against the M2 and M3 muscarinic receptors, we screened 3.1 million molecules for ligands with new physical properties, chemotypes, and receptor subtype selectivities. Of 19 docking-prioritized molecules tested against the M2 subtype, 11 had substantial activity and 8 represented new chemotypes. Intriguingly, two were uncharged ligands with low micromolar to high nanomolar Ki values, an observation with few precedents among aminergic GPCRs. To exploit a single amino-acid substitution among the binding pockets between the M2 and M3 receptors, we selected molecules predicted by docking to bind to the M3 and but not the M2 receptor. Of 16 molecules tested, 8 bound to the M3 receptor. Whereas selectivity remained modest for most of these, one was a partial agonist at the M3 receptor without measurable M2 agonism. Consistent with this activity, this compound stimulated insulin release from a mouse β-cell line. These results support the ability of structure-based discovery to identify new ligands with unexplored chemotypes and physical properties, leading to new biologic functions, even in an area as heavily explored as muscarinic pharmacology.

[1]  J. Wess,et al.  Functional role in ligand binding and receptor activation of an asparagine residue present in the sixth transmembrane domain of all muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[2]  C. Lindsley,et al.  Discovery and Characterization of Novel Allosteric Potentiators of M1 Muscarinic Receptors Reveals Multiple Modes of Activity , 2009, Molecular Pharmacology.

[3]  B. Shoichet,et al.  Hierarchical docking of databases of multiple ligand conformations. , 2005, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[4]  J. Wess,et al.  Beneficial metabolic effects caused by persistent activation of beta-cell M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in transgenic mice. , 2010, Endocrinology.

[5]  Albert C. Pan,et al.  Structure and Dynamics of the M3 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor , 2012, Nature.

[6]  J. Wess,et al.  RGS4 is a negative regulator of insulin release from pancreatic β-cells in vitro and in vivo , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Arthur Christopoulos,et al.  Allosteric modulators of GPCRs: a novel approach for the treatment of CNS disorders , 2009, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[8]  A. IJzerman,et al.  Allosteric modulation of G protein-coupled receptors. , 2001, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.

[9]  Avner Schlessinger,et al.  Ligand Discovery from a Dopamine D3 Receptor Homology Model and Crystal Structure , 2011, Nature chemical biology.

[10]  Bo Li,et al.  Rapid identification of functionally critical amino acids in a G protein–coupled receptor , 2007, Nature Methods.

[11]  G. Klebe,et al.  Successful virtual screening for a submicromolar antagonist of the neurokinin-1 receptor based on a ligand-supported homology model. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[12]  Brian K. Shoichet,et al.  Rapid Context-Dependent Ligand Desolvation in Molecular Docking , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[13]  J. Ballesteros,et al.  [19] Integrated methods for the construction of three-dimensional models and computational probing of structure-function relations in G protein-coupled receptors , 1995 .

[14]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  Structure-based discovery of novel chemotypes for adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonists. , 2010, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[15]  J. Irwin,et al.  ZINC ? A Free Database of Commercially Available Compounds for Virtual Screening. , 2005 .

[16]  Ryan G. Coleman,et al.  ZINC: A Free Tool to Discover Chemistry for Biology , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[17]  Sid Topiol,et al.  Use of the X-ray structure of the Beta2-adrenergic receptor for drug discovery. , 2008, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters.

[18]  P. Willett,et al.  Comparison of topological descriptors for similarity-based virtual screening using multiple bioactive reference structures. , 2004, Organic & biomolecular chemistry.

[19]  Matthias Rarey,et al.  Protein Flexibility in Structure‐Based Virtual Screening: From Models to Algorithms , 2011 .

[20]  Peter Kolb,et al.  Limits of Ligand Selectivity from Docking to Models: In Silico Screening for A1 Adenosine Receptor Antagonists , 2012, PloS one.

[21]  J. Miyazaki,et al.  Pancreatic beta cell line MIN6 exhibits characteristics of glucose metabolism and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion similar to those of normal islets , 1993, Diabetologia.

[22]  F. LaFerla,et al.  M1 agonists as a potential disease-modifying therapy for Alzheimer's disease. , 2009, Current Alzheimer research.

[23]  A. Kruse,et al.  Structure of the human M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor bound to an antagonist , 2011, Nature.

[24]  Arthur Christopoulos,et al.  Orthosteric and Allosteric Modes of Interaction of Novel Selective Agonists of the M1 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor , 2010, Molecular Pharmacology.

[25]  John P. Overington,et al.  ChEMBL: a large-scale bioactivity database for drug discovery , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[26]  R. Stevens,et al.  Crystal structure-based virtual screening for fragment-like ligands of the human histamine H(1) receptor. , 2011, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[27]  Michael M. Mysinger,et al.  Automated Docking Screens: A Feasibility Study , 2009, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[28]  Arthur Christopoulos,et al.  Identification of Orthosteric and Allosteric Site Mutations in M2 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptors That Contribute to Ligand-selective Signaling Bias* , 2010, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[29]  W. Messer The utility of muscarinic agonists in the treatment of alzheimer’s disease , 2002, Journal of Molecular Neuroscience.

[30]  C. Guenet,et al.  Site-directed mutagenesis of the putative human muscarinic M2 receptor binding site. , 1999, European journal of pharmacology.

[31]  Yvonne C. Martin,et al.  Application of Belief Theory to Similarity Data Fusion for Use in Analog Searching and Lead Hopping , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[32]  Jonathan A. Javitch,et al.  Discovery of a Novel Selective Kappa-Opioid Receptor Agonist Using Crystal Structure-Based Virtual Screening , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[33]  C. Lindsley,et al.  Subtype-selective allosteric modulators of muscarinic receptors for the treatment of CNS disorders. , 2009, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[34]  A. Christopoulos,et al.  Allosteric modulation of the muscarinic M4 receptor as an approach to treating schizophrenia , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Richard M. Eglen,et al.  Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors: mutant mice provide new insights for drug development , 2007, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[36]  Maria F. Sassano,et al.  Conformation Guides Molecular Efficacy in Docking Screens of Activated β-2 Adrenergic G Protein Coupled Receptor , 2013, ACS chemical biology.

[37]  K. Jacobson,et al.  Virtual screening leads to the discovery of novel non-nucleotide P2Y₁ receptor antagonists. , 2012, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.

[38]  Michael M. Mysinger,et al.  Structure-based ligand discovery for the protein–protein interface of chemokine receptor CXCR4 , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  Peter Kolb,et al.  Structure-based discovery of β2-adrenergic receptor ligands , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  Nathan Robertson,et al.  Article pubs.acs.org/jmc Identification of Novel Adenosine A 2A Receptor Antagonists by Virtual Screening , 2022 .

[41]  U. Holzgrabe,et al.  Rational design of dualsteric GPCR ligands: quests and promise , 2010, British journal of pharmacology.

[42]  J. Wess,et al.  Structural basis of receptor/G protein coupling selectivity studied with muscarinic receptors as model systems. , 1997, Life sciences.

[43]  Kenneth Jones,et al.  Use of the X-ray structure of the beta2-adrenergic receptor for drug discovery. Part 2: Identification of active compounds. , 2008, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters.

[44]  Brian K. Shoichet,et al.  Structure-Based Discovery of A2A Adenosine Receptor Ligands , 2010, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[45]  Jacob D. Durrant,et al.  Computer-aided drug-discovery techniques that account for receptor flexibility. , 2010, Current opinion in pharmacology.

[46]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Flexible ligand docking to multiple receptor conformations: a practical alternative. , 2008, Current opinion in structural biology.

[47]  Tong Liu,et al.  Structural Basis of M3 Muscarinic Receptor Dimer/Oligomer Formation* , 2011, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[48]  Brian K Shoichet,et al.  Testing a flexible-receptor docking algorithm in a model binding site. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.