Agonist and antagonist EMG activation during isometric torque development at the elbow in spastic hemiparesis.

Voluntary isometric step contractions of the elbow flexor and extensor muscles were studied in a group of patients with paresis arising as the result of unilateral cerebral lesion and in a control group of normal subjects. For each subject the maximum isometric torque in flexion and extension was obtained, along with a series of graduated torque steps up to this maximum, in order to perform a regression analysis between torque developed and the associated agonist and antagonist EMG. This relationship proved to be linear in all normal subjects and in all but the most paretic spastic patients. If the patients were grouped according to their ability to make discrete large angle flexion and extension movements at the elbow, a clear correspondence was seen between increasing movement disability and the degree of paresis. No significant differences were found in the torque/EMG relationship of spastic patients when either elbow extensors or flexors were acting as the agonist in a contraction. Similarly, no evidence of exaggerated antagonist co-activation was found. It is concluded that, in the upper arm muscles, hemiparesis following stroke cannot, under isometric conditions, be attributed to hyperactivity of antagonist muscles.

[1]  R. Angel,et al.  Impairment of voluntary movement by spasticity , 1979, Annals of neurology.

[2]  D Bourbonnais,et al.  Abnormal spatial patterns of elbow muscle activation in hemiparetic human subjects. , 1989, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  M. Flanders,et al.  Arm muscle activation for static forces in three-dimensional space. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  G. Gottlieb,et al.  Organizing principles for single-joint movements. IV. Implications for isometric contractions. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  M. Flanders,et al.  Quantification of peripherally induced reciprocal activation during voluntary muscle contraction. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  D. Corcos,et al.  Movement deficits caused by hyperexcitable stretch reflexes in spastic humans. , 1986, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  S. Gandevia,et al.  The distribution of muscular weakness in upper motor neuron lesions affecting the arm. , 1989, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  C. Gielen,et al.  Coordination and inhomogeneous activation of human arm muscles during isometric torques. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  J R Jenner,et al.  Recovery of elbow function in voluntary positioning of the hand following hemiplegia due to stroke. , 1990, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[10]  L. Lange,et al.  A Physiological Approach to Clinical Neurology , 1982 .

[11]  S. Sahrmann,et al.  The relationship of voluntary movement of spasticity in the upper motor neuron syndrome , 1977, Transactions of the American Neurological Association.

[12]  V. Dietz,et al.  Normal and impaired regulation of muscle stiffness in gait: A new hypothesis about muscle hypertonia , 1983, Experimental Neurology.

[13]  D. Wade,et al.  Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. , 1992, Current opinion in neurology and neurosurgery.

[14]  Norton Bj,et al.  The relationship of voluntary movement to spasticity in the upper motor neuron syndrome. , 1977 .

[15]  W Z Rymer,et al.  Abnormal force--EMG relations in paretic limbs of hemiparetic human subjects. , 1981, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[16]  G. Gottlieb,et al.  Strategies for the control of voluntary movements with one mechanical degree of freedom , 1989, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.