Patient-Specific Anatomy: The New Area of Anatomy Based on 3D Modelling

3D anatomical medical imaging (CT-scan or MRI) can provide a vision of patient anatomy and pathology. But for any human, even experts, these images have two drawbacks: each voxel density is visualized in grey levels, which are totally inadequate for human eye cones’ perception, and the volume is cut in slices, making any 3D mental representation of the real 3D anatomy of the patient highly complex. Usually, the limits of human perception are overcome by human knowledge. In anatomy, this knowledge is a mix between the average anatomy definition and anatomical variations. But how to understand an anatomical variation from slices in grey levels? In routine, such a difficulty can sometimes be so important that it creates errors. Fortunately, these mistakes can be overcome through 3D patient-specific surgical anatomy. New computer-based medical image analysis and associated 3D modelling provide a highly efficient solution by allowing a patient-specific virtual copy of their anatomic reconstruction. Some articles reporting clinical studies show that up to one-third of initial planning is modified using 3D modelling, and that this modification is always validated efficiently intraoperatively. They also demonstrate that major errors can thus be avoided. In this chapter, we propose to illustrate the 3D modelling process and the associated benefit on a set of patient clinical cases in three main domains: liver surgery, thoracic surgery, and kidney surgery. In each case, we will present the limits of usual medical image analysis due to an average anatomical definition and limited human perception. 3D modelling is provided by the Visible Patient online service and the surgeon then plans his/her surgery on a simple PC using the Visible Patient Planning software. We will then compare the result obtained from a normal anatomical analysis with the result obtained from the 3D modelling and associated preoperative planning. These examples illustrate the great benefit of using patient-specific 3D modelling and preoperative virtual planning in comparison with the usual anatomical definition using only medical image slices. These examples also confirm that this new patient-specific anatomy corrects many mistakes created by the current standard definition, increased by physician interpretation that can vary from one person to another.

[1]  Goldsmith Na,et al.  The surgical anatomy pertaining to liver resection. , 1957 .

[2]  Werner Platzer,et al.  ZUR SEGMENTEINTEILUNG DER LEBER , 1966 .

[3]  R C Nelson,et al.  Preoperative localization of focal liver lesions to specific liver segments: utility of CT during arterial portography. , 1990, Radiology.

[4]  A Roche,et al.  Preoperative segmental localization of hepatic metastases: utility of three-dimensional CT during arterial portography. , 1991, Radiology.

[5]  D Selle,et al.  Segmental anatomy of the liver: poor correlation with CT. , 1998, Radiology.

[6]  K. Takasaki,et al.  Glissonean pedicle transection method for hepatic resection: a new concept of liver segmentation. , 1998, Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery.

[7]  C. Couinaud,et al.  Liver Anatomy: Portal (and Suprahepatic) or Biliary Segmentation , 2000, Digestive Surgery.

[8]  Manfred Thelen,et al.  Segmentanatomie der Leber in der Computertomographie: Lokalisieren wir die Läsionen richtig?* , 2000 .

[9]  N. Ayache,et al.  Fully Automatic Anatomical, Pathological, and Functional Segmentation from CT Scans for Hepatic Surgery , 2001 .

[10]  N. Ayache,et al.  Fully automatic anatomical, pathological, and functional segmentation from CT scans for hepatic surgery , 2001 .

[11]  Thomas Lehnert,et al.  Limits of Couinaud's Liver Segment Classification: A Quantitative Computer-Based Three-Dimensional Analysis , 2002, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[12]  C Couinaud,et al.  Erreur dans le diagnostic topographique des lésions hépatiques , 2002 .

[13]  G. Stuckmann,et al.  Limitations and pitfalls of Couinaud's segmentation of the liver in transaxial Imaging , 2003, European Radiology.

[14]  H. Bismuth,et al.  Surgical anatomy and anatomical surgery of the liver , 2005, World Journal of Surgery.

[15]  Jean H D Fasel,et al.  Portal Venous Territories Within the Human Liver: An Anatomical Reappraisal , 2008, Anatomical record.

[16]  L. Soler,et al.  3D virtual reality and selective vascular control for laparoscopic left hepatic lobectomy , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.

[17]  D Mutter,et al.  Recent advances in liver imaging , 2010, Expert review of gastroenterology & hepatology.

[18]  Luc Soler,et al.  Real-time 3D image reconstruction guidance in liver resection surgery. , 2014, Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition.

[19]  Luc Soler,et al.  Accuracy of preoperative automatic measurement of the liver volume by CT-scan combined to a 3D virtual surgical planning software (3DVSP) , 2014, Surgical Endoscopy.

[20]  Luc Soler,et al.  Patient specific anatomy: the new area of anatomy based on computer science illustrated on liver. , 2015, Journal of visualized surgery.

[21]  Jin-Ming Zhao,et al.  Application of 3D reconstruction for surgical treatment of hepatic alveolar echinococcosis. , 2015, World journal of gastroenterology.

[22]  Agathe Seguin-Givelet,et al.  Thoracoscopic anatomic segmentectomies for lung cancer: technical aspects. , 2016, Journal of visualized surgery.

[23]  Ning Zhang,et al.  Traditional surgical planning of liver surgery is modified by 3D interactive quantitative surgical planning approach: a single-center experience with 305 patients. , 2017, Hepatobiliary & pancreatic diseases international : HBPD INT.

[24]  Luc Soler,et al.  Augmented Reality in Minimally Invasive Digestive Surgery , 2017 .

[25]  Franois Colcombet La drogue aujourdhui et demain , 2017 .

[26]  Jean-Nicolas Dacher,et al.  Three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction for operative planning in robotic segmentectomy: a pilot study. , 2018, Journal of thoracic disease.

[27]  Agathe Seguin-Givelet,et al.  Thoracoscopic right S9+10 segmentectomy , 2018, Journal of Visualized Surgery.

[28]  Agathe Seguin-Givelet,et al.  Anatomical variations and pitfalls to know during thoracoscopic segmentectomies. , 2018, Journal of thoracic disease.

[29]  R. M. Santiago,et al.  VATS biopsy of an adult with pulmonary langerhans cell histiocytosis: case report , 2020 .