Perception of Face Parts and Face Configurations: An fMRI Study

fMRI studies have reported three regions in human ventral visual cortex that respond selectively to faces: the occipital face area (OFA), the fusiform face area (FFA), and a face-selective region in the superior temporal sulcus (fSTS). Here, we asked whether these areas respond to two first-order aspects of the face argued to be important for face perception, face parts (eyes, nose, and mouth), and the T-shaped spatial configuration of these parts. Specifically, we measured the magnitude of response in these areas to stimuli that (i) either contained real face parts, or did not, and (ii) either had veridical face configurations, or did not. The OFA and the fSTS were sensitive only to the presence of real face parts, not to the correct configuration of those parts, whereas the FFA was sensitive to both face parts and face configuration. Further, only in the FFA was the response to configuration and part information correlated across voxels, suggesting that the FFA contains a unified representation that includes both kinds of information. In combination with prior results from fMRI, TMS, MEG, and patient studies, our data illuminate the functional division of labor in the OFA, FFA, and fSTS.

[1]  Chris I Baker,et al.  Differential contributions of occipitotemporal regions to person perception , 2011, Cognitive neuroscience.

[2]  R. Goebel,et al.  Individual faces elicit distinct response patterns in human anterior temporal cortex , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Hemispheric Asymmetries for Whole-Based and Part-Based Face Processing in the Human Fusiform Gyrus , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  T. Hendler,et al.  A hierarchical axis of object processing stages in the human visual cortex. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[5]  Ying Choon Wu,et al.  Are depictive gestures like pictures? Commonalities and differences in semantic processing , 2011, Brain and Language.

[6]  P. Vuilleumier,et al.  Faces call for attention: evidence from patients with visual extinction , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  Simon Baron-Cohen,et al.  The Development of Differential Use of Inner and Outer Face Features in Familiar Face Identification. , 1995 .

[8]  J. Keenan,et al.  Lesions of the fusiform face area impair perception of facial configuration in prosopagnosia , 2002, Neurology.

[9]  D. Pitcher,et al.  The role of the occipital face area in the cortical face perception network , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  G. Yovel,et al.  TMS Evidence for the Involvement of the Right Occipital Face Area in Early Face Processing , 2007, Current Biology.

[11]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The Effect of Face Inversion on Activity in Human Neural Systems for Face and Object Perception , 1999, Neuron.

[12]  G. Rees,et al.  Neuroimaging: Decoding mental states from brain activity in humans , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[13]  Iroise Dumontheil,et al.  Taking perspective into account in a communicative task , 2010, NeuroImage.

[14]  R. Hari,et al.  Face recognition and cortical responses show similar sensitivity to noise spatial frequency. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[15]  Amanda Ellison,et al.  Event-related Repetitive TMS Reveals Distinct, Critical Roles for Right OFA and Bilateral Posterior STS in Judging the Sex and Trustworthiness of Faces , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Faces are represented holistically in the human occipito-temporal cortex , 2006, NeuroImage.

[17]  A. Treves,et al.  Morphing Marilyn into Maggie dissociates physical and identity face representations in the brain , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  John T. Clark,et al.  Contextually Evoked Object-Specific Responses in Human Visual Cortex , 2004 .

[19]  M. Tarr,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area is Part of a Network that Processes Faces at the Individual Level , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  Peter Thier,et al.  Dissociable Roles of the Superior Temporal Sulcus and the Intraparietal Sulcus in Joint Attention: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding the recognition of facial identity and facial expression , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[22]  Q. Vuong,et al.  The Respective Role of Low and High Spatial Frequencies in Supporting Configural and Featural Processing of Faces , 2005, Perception.

[23]  Sidney J. Segalowitz,et al.  Telling one face from another: Electrocortical correlates of facial characteristics among individual female faces , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  J. Haxby,et al.  Distinct representations of eye gaze and identity in the distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  E. Halgren,et al.  Spatio-temporal stages in face and word processing. I. Depth-recorded potentials in the human occipital, temporal and parietal lobes [corrected]. , 1994, Journal of physiology, Paris.

[26]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  A Preference for Contralateral Stimuli in Human Object- and Face-Selective Cortex , 2007, PloS one.

[27]  R. Dolan,et al.  fMRI-adaptation reveals dissociable neural representations of identity and expression in face perception. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  Mark Blades,et al.  Recognizing people from the inner or outer parts of their faces , 2003 .

[29]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Neural Basis of the Behavioral Face-Inversion Effect , 2005, Current Biology.

[30]  H B Barlow,et al.  Single units and sensation: a neuron doctrine for perceptual psychology? , 1972, Perception.

[31]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. I: Potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex by face and non-face stimuli. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[32]  J. Riddoch,et al.  Are faces special? A case of pure prosopagnosia , 2008, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[33]  H. Kashima,et al.  A deficit in discriminating gaze direction in a case with right superior temporal gyrus lesion , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  J. Barton,et al.  The nature of upright and inverted face representations: An adaptation-transfer study of configuration , 2012, Cortex.

[35]  Alison Harris,et al.  The Representation of Parts and Wholes in Face-selective Cortex , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  Cornelia McCormick,et al.  Distinct patterns of functional and effective connectivity between perirhinal cortex and other cortical regions in recognition memory and perceptual discrimination. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[37]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The role of lateral occipital face and object areas in the face inversion effect , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[38]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Stages of processing in face perception: an MEG study , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[40]  R. Campbell,et al.  Recognition of Parts of Famous-Face Photographs by Children: An Experimental Note , 1995, Perception.

[41]  Sean M. Polyn,et al.  Beyond mind-reading: multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[42]  Marlene Behrmann,et al.  Probing the face-space of individuals with prosopagnosia , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[43]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The fusiform face area subserves face perception, not generic within-category identification , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[44]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  Theoretical, Statistical, and Practical Perspectives on Pattern-based Classification Approaches to the Analysis of Functional Neuroimaging Data , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[45]  T. Allison,et al.  Face-Specific Processing in the Human Fusiform Gyrus , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  T. Poggio,et al.  I think I know that face... , 1996, Nature.

[47]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Face perception: domain specific, not process specific. , 2004, Neuron.

[48]  E. Halgren,et al.  Cognitive response profile of the human fusiform face area as determined by MEG. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[49]  Galia Avidan,et al.  Structural imaging reveals anatomical alterations in inferotemporal cortex in congenital prosopagnosia. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[50]  Kenneth F. Valyear,et al.  The fusiform face area is not sufficient for face recognition: Evidence from a patient with dense prosopagnosia and no occipital face area , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[51]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  The representations of spacing and part-based information are associated for upright faces but dissociated for objects: Evidence from individual differences , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[52]  M. Seghier,et al.  A network of occipito-temporal face-sensitive areas besides the right middle fusiform gyrus is necessary for normal face processing. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[53]  Robert W. Kentridge,et al.  Separate channels for processing form, texture, and color: evidence from FMRI adaptation and visual object agnosia. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[54]  B. Rossion,et al.  Recovery from adaptation to facial identity is larger for upright than inverted faces in the human occipito-temporal cortex , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[55]  K. Nakayama,et al.  The effect of face inversion on the human fusiform face area , 1998, Cognition.

[56]  Paul E. Downing,et al.  Division of Labor between Lateral and Ventral Extrastriate Representations of Faces, Bodies, and Objects , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[57]  Zhe Wang,et al.  The other face of the other-race effect: An fMRI investigation of the other-race face categorization advantage , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[58]  Susanne Quadflieg,et al.  Stereotypes and stereotyping: What's the brain got to do with it? , 2011 .

[59]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Spatio temporal dynamics of face recognition. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[60]  T. Allison,et al.  Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[61]  Ralph Adolphs,et al.  The neuropsychology of face perception: beyond simple dissociations and functional selectivity , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[62]  T. Zeffiro,et al.  Enhanced visual functioning in autism: An ALE meta‐analysis , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[63]  T Yamamoto,et al.  Selective impairment of facial recognition due to a haematoma restricted to the right fusiform and lateral occipital region , 2001, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[64]  D. Maurer,et al.  Neural correlates of processing facial identity based on features versus their spacing , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[65]  E. Halgren,et al.  Spatio-temporal stages in face and word processing. 1. Depth recorded potentials in the human occipital and parietal lobes , 1994, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[66]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. , 1996, Annual review of neuroscience.

[67]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[68]  N. Haig Exploring Recognition with Interchanged Facial Features , 1986, Perception.

[69]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Stimulus inversion and the responses of face and object-sensitive cortical areas. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[70]  Dimitri Van De Ville,et al.  White-Matter Connectivity between Face-Responsive Regions in the Human Brain , 2012 .

[71]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[72]  Bo-Cheng Kuo,et al.  Chinese characters elicit face-like N170 inversion effects , 2011, Brain and Cognition.

[73]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  Implicit attitudes in prosopagnosia , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[74]  J. Atkinson,et al.  Development of human visual function , 2011, Vision Research.

[75]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. II: Response properties of face-specific potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[76]  Raymond J. Dolan,et al.  Role of Features and Second-order Spatial Relations in Face Discrimination, Face Recognition, and Individual Face Skills: Behavioral and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[77]  M. Tarr,et al.  Activation of the middle fusiform 'face area' increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[78]  H. Barlow,et al.  Single Units and Sensation: A Neuron Doctrine for Perceptual Psychology? , 1972, Perception.