Neural Substrates of Contextual Interference during Motor Learning Support a Model of Active Preparation

When individuals acquire new skills, initial performance is typically better and tasks are judged to be easier when the tasks are segregated and practiced by block, compared to when different tasks are randomly intermixed in practice. However, subsequent skill retention is better for a randomly practiced group, an effect known as contextual interference (CI). The present study examined the neural substrates of CI using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Individuals learned a set of three 4-element sequences with the left hand according to a block or random practice schedule. Behavioral retest for skill retention confirmed the presence of a typical CI effect with the random group outperforming the block group. Using a go/no-go fMRI paradigm, sequence preparation during the premovement study period was separated from movement execution. Imaging data for the two groups were compared for the first 1/3 and final 1/3 of training trials. Toward the end of training, behavioral performance between the two groups was similar, although the random group would later display a performance advantage on retention testing. During study time, the random group showed greater activity in sensorimotor and premotor regions compared to the block group. These areas are associated with motor preparation, sequencing, and response selection. This pattern of recruitment is consistent with the hypothesis that CI benefits in a sequencing task are due to improved capacity to actively prepare motor responses.

[1]  Shigeru Muraki,et al.  Cortical activity in multiple motor areas during sequential finger movements: An application of independent component analysis , 2005, NeuroImage.

[2]  J. Ashe,et al.  Anticipatory Activity in Primary Motor Cortex Codes Memorized Movement Sequences , 2005, Neuron.

[3]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Abstract and Effector-Specific Representations of Motor Sequences Identified with PET , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Motor sequence learning with the nondominant left hand , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  M. Walton,et al.  Action sets and decisions in the medial frontal cortex , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  R. Passingham,et al.  Specialisation within the prefrontal cortex: the ventral prefrontal cortex and associative learning , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  P J Smith,et al.  Applying contextual interference to the Pawlata roll. , 1995, Journal of sports sciences.

[9]  Yufeng Zang,et al.  Functional organization of the primary motor cortex characterized by event-related fMRI during movement preparation and execution , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[10]  Peter Praamstra,et al.  Frontoparietal control of spatial attention and motor intention in human EEG. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  R. Magill,et al.  A REVIEW OF THE CONTEXTUAL INTERFERENCE EFFECT IN MOTOR SKILL ACQUISITION , 1990 .

[12]  Chris Button,et al.  The influence of professional expertise and task complexity upon the potency of the contextual interference effect. , 2005, Acta psychologica.

[13]  David L Wright,et al.  Long-Term Motor Programming Improvements Occur Via Concatenation of Movement Sequences During Random But Not During Blocked Practice , 2004, Journal of motor behavior.

[14]  Kae Nakamura,et al.  Neuronal activity in medial frontal cortex during learning of sequential procedures. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  D. Wright,et al.  An Assessment of the Attention Demands during Random- and Blocked-Practice Schedules , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[16]  R. Magill,et al.  American Psychological Association, Inc. The Locus of Contextual Interference in Motor-Skill Acquisition i , 2022 .

[18]  P. Strick,et al.  Skill representation in the primary motor cortex after long-term practice. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .

[20]  David L. Wright,et al.  Contextual Interference: A Response Planning Account , 1998 .

[21]  R. C. Oldfield THE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HANDEDNESS , 1971 .

[22]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Goal-selection and movement-related conflict during bimanual reaching movements. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[23]  Fred Paas,et al.  High versus low contextual interference in simulation-based training of troubleshooting skills: effects on transfer performance and invested mental effort , 1998 .

[24]  M. Rushworth,et al.  Organization of action sequences and the role of the pre-SMA. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  M. Hallett,et al.  Early consolidation in human primary motor cortex , 2002, Nature.

[26]  Paul Cisek,et al.  Neural activity in primary motor and dorsal premotor cortex in reaching tasks with the contralateral versus ipsilateral arm. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  M. Rushworth,et al.  The left parietal and premotor cortices: motor attention and selection , 2003, NeuroImage.

[28]  Kristina M. Visscher,et al.  A Core System for the Implementation of Task Sets , 2006, Neuron.

[29]  S. Iversen Motor control , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[30]  K. Kurata,et al.  Premotor cortex of monkeys: set- and movement-related activity reflecting amplitude and direction of wrist movements. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Neural Substrates of Response-based Sequence Learning using fMRI , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  A distributed left hemisphere network active during planning of everyday tool use skills. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[33]  J. Kalaska,et al.  Deciding not to GO: neuronal correlates of response selection in a GO/NOGO task in primate premotor and parietal cortex. , 1995, Cerebral cortex.

[34]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of Perception and Human Performance. Volume 2. Cognitive Processes and Performance , 1994 .

[35]  T. D. Lee,et al.  Influence of practice schedule on testing schema theory predictions in adults. , 1985, Journal of motor behavior.

[36]  Matthew F. S. Rushworth,et al.  Components of Switching Intentional Set , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[37]  J. Shea,et al.  Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. , 1979 .

[38]  Alice F. Healy,et al.  The Effects of Contextual Interference on the Acquisition and Retention of Logical Rules , 1995 .

[39]  K. A. Hadland,et al.  Role of the human medial frontal cortex in task switching: a combined fMRI and TMS study. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[40]  M. Hallett,et al.  Dynamic cortical involvement in implicit and explicit motor sequence learning. A PET study. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[41]  A C Nobre,et al.  Components of attentional set-switching. , 2005, Experimental psychology.

[42]  R. Passingham,et al.  Learning Arbitrary Visuomotor Associations: Temporal Dynamic of Brain Activity , 2001, NeuroImage.

[43]  H. Gemba,et al.  Preparative activities in posterior parietal cortex for self-paced movement in monkeys , 2004, Neuroscience Letters.

[44]  K. Petersson,et al.  Towards an explicit account of implicit learning , 2005, Current opinion in neurology.

[45]  J. Dawes Creating Open Agility Drills , 2008 .

[46]  M. Inase,et al.  Neuronal activity in the primate premotor, supplementary, and precentral motor cortex during visually guided and internally determined sequential movements. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[47]  E. G. Jones Cerebral Cortex , 1987, Cerebral Cortex.

[48]  G E Alexander,et al.  Neural representations of the target (goal) of visually guided arm movements in three motor areas of the monkey. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[49]  Yoram Ben-Shaul,et al.  Neuronal activity in motor cortical areas reflects the sequential context of movement. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[50]  R. E Passingham,et al.  Cerebral dominance for action in the human brain: the selection of actions , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[51]  Dirk Kerzel,et al.  Immediate spatial distortions of pointing movements induced by visual landmarks , 2004 .

[52]  Investigation of the Contextual Interference Effect in the Manipulation of the Motor Parameter of Over-All Force , 1996, Perceptual and motor skills.

[53]  Peter J K Smith Applying Contextual Interference to Snowboarding Skills , 2002, Perceptual and motor skills.

[54]  F. Brady Contextual Interference and Teaching Golf Skills , 1997, Perceptual and motor skills.

[55]  M. Erb,et al.  Sensorimotor mapping of the human cerebellum: fMRI evidence of somatotopic organization , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[56]  A. Georgopoulos,et al.  Cognitive neurophysiology of the motor cortex. , 1993, Science.

[57]  Alexandra T Basford,et al.  Cortical control of motor sequences , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[58]  Howard N. Zelaznik,et al.  Advances in Motor Learning and Control , 1996 .

[59]  D. Brooks,et al.  Motor sequence learning: a study with positron emission tomography , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[60]  M. Honda,et al.  Both primary motor cortex and supplementary motor area play an important role in complex finger movement. , 1993, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[61]  R. Passingham,et al.  Neural correlates of visuomotor associations. Spatial rules compared with arbitrary rules. , 2001, Experimental brain research.

[62]  Alternating versus Blocked Practice in Learning a Cartwheel , 2003, Perceptual and motor skills.

[63]  A. Georgopoulos,et al.  Sequential activity in human motor areas during a delayed cued finger movement task studied by time‐resolved fMRI , 1997, Neuroreport.

[64]  R. Turner,et al.  Event-Related fMRI: Characterizing Differential Responses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[65]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Off-Line Learning and the Primary Motor Cortex , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[66]  K. Zilles,et al.  Differential Involvement of Parietal and Precentral Regions in Movement Preparation and Motor Intention , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.