Following up on treated stutterers: studies of perceptions of fluency and job status.

The present research aimed to investigate perceptions of fluency of persons treated with a fluency shaping technique called smooth speech. Four separate studies were conducted. The first showed that virtually all those treated were satisfied with their fluency following treatment. However, this satisfaction decreased to under half in the long term. The second study showed considerable opportunity in the long term for job promotion and upgrade in occupation for persons successfully completing a smooth-speech program. The third study compared employer perceptions of their employees' speech between a group who had received treatment for stuttering and a nontreatment control. The employers' perceptions of the treatment group were significantly enhanced, whereas no significant change occurred in employers' perceptions for the control group. The last study explored possible determinants of relapse in a population of treated stutterers. Results showed that most had experienced some degree of relapse, but had subsequently recovered. Few believed their relapse was associated with being embarrassed about using smooth speech. The majority believed their relapses were related to feeling pressured to speak faster. Investigating perceptions of fluency following treatment for stuttering seems an important goal for research in order to enhance treatment effectiveness. Directions for further research into this area are discussed.

[1]  R A Prosek,et al.  Temporal characteristics related to the discrimination of stutterers' and nonstutterers' speech samples. , 1982, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[2]  G. Andrews,et al.  Short- and long-term outcome in an intensive treatment program for adult stutterers. , 1981, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[3]  G. Andrews,et al.  Prediction of Outcome After Treatment for Stuttering , 1988, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[4]  G. Andrews,et al.  A scale to measure locus of control of behaviour. , 1984, The British journal of medical psychology.

[5]  G. Andrews,et al.  An overview of a behavioural treatment for stuttering , 1987 .

[6]  O. Bloodstein A handbook on stuttering , 1969 .

[7]  E. Cooper,et al.  Employer attitudes toward stuttering , 1983 .

[8]  G. Andrews,et al.  The Prediction and Prevention of Relapse in Stuttering , 1985, Behavior modification.

[9]  D. Metz,et al.  An acoustical analysis of stutterer's speech prior to and at the termination of speech therapy , 1979 .

[10]  G. Andrews,et al.  Regression to the mean in pretreatment measures of stuttering. , 1981, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[11]  R. Ingham,et al.  Speech quality measurement and the management of stuttering. , 1987, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[12]  G. Andrews,et al.  Stuttering: overt and covert measurement of the speech of treated subjects. , 1982, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[13]  W. Perkins Replacement of stuttering with normal speech. II. Clinical procedures. , 1973, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[14]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[15]  B. Murdoch,et al.  Stuttering : A Perceptual Analysis of Speech following Treatment , 1986 .