Creative patterns and stimulation in conceptual design

Abstract Conceptual design is a creative process. Designers create functions to satisfy customer needs and behaviors and forms to fulfill their functions. Although cognitive processes are at the center in developing new ideas, they are rarely taken into account in research and development of design support methods and systems. It is conceivable that if one understands how cognitive processes are stimulated to generate design ideas, then more effective methods and tools can be developed to support conceptual design. In this article, a cognitive model of conceptual design is developed to capture the relationships among design entities, design operations, and cognitive processes. A protocol analysis is performed to evaluate the model, and a cognitive experiment carried out to study the creative patterns and stimulating relationships. The results show that designers exhibit patterns of creative design behavior, and that these patterns can be captured and instilled into the design process to promote creativity.

[1]  Douglas B. Lenat,et al.  Automated Theory Formation in Mathematics , 1977, IJCAI.

[2]  R. Dreistadt,et al.  The Use of Analogies and Incubation in Obtaining Insights in Creative Problem Solving , 1969 .

[3]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[4]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  The creative cognition approach. , 1995 .

[5]  Maarten van Someren,et al.  The Think Aloud Method: A Practical Guide to Modelling Cognitive Processes , 1994 .

[6]  Shinji Tanaka,et al.  INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING DESIGN , 2005 .

[7]  L. H. Shu,et al.  Biomimetic design through natural language analysis to facilitate cross-domain information retrieval , 2007, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[8]  David H. Helman,et al.  Analogical Reasoning: Perspectives of Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Science, and Philosophy , 2009 .

[9]  John S. Gero,et al.  Artificial Intelligence in Design ’94 , 1994, Springer Netherlands.

[10]  N. Cross Designerly Ways of Knowing: Design Discipline Versus Design Science , 2001, Design Issues.

[11]  K. Wood,et al.  QUANTITATIVE MEASURES FOR DESIGN BY ANALOGY , 2000 .

[12]  Brian Falkenhainer,et al.  The Structure-Mapping Engine: Algorithm and Examples , 1989, Artif. Intell..

[13]  Sang Won Lee,et al.  Design Activities and Personal Creativity Characteristics: A Case Study of Dual Protocol Analysis Using Design Information and Process , 2006 .

[14]  Yan Jin,et al.  Study of mental iteration in different design situations , 2006 .

[15]  Masaki Suwa,et al.  Macroscopic analysis of design processes based on a scheme for coding designers' cognitive actions , 1998 .

[16]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Creative Cognition: Theory, Research, and Applications , 1996 .

[17]  Yu-Tung Liu Encoding Explicit and Implicit Emergent Subshapes Based on Empirical Findings About Human Vision , 1994 .

[18]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Studies of visual synthesis: integration of fragments into forms. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  John S. Gero,et al.  An approach to the analysis of design protocols , 1998 .

[20]  John S. Gero,et al.  Modeling Creativity and Knowledge-Based Creative Design , 1993 .

[21]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Expertise in engineering design , 1998 .

[22]  John S. Gero,et al.  Understanding conceptual electronic design using protocol analysis , 1998 .

[23]  Pat Langley,et al.  Rediscovering Physics with BACON.3 , 1979, IJCAI.

[24]  G. Goldschmidt The dialectics of sketching , 1991 .

[25]  H. Simon,et al.  The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.) , 1996 .

[26]  T. Purcell,et al.  Mental synthesis and creativity in design: an experimental examination , 2000 .

[27]  Maria C. Yang,et al.  Observations on concept generation and sketching in engineering design , 2009 .

[28]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing , 1992 .

[29]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  A functional representation for aiding biomimetic and artificial inspiration of new ideas , 2005, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[30]  John S. Gero,et al.  A function–behavior–structure ontology of processes , 2007, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[31]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Creative cognition in design: processes of exceptional designers , 2002, Creativity & Cognition.

[32]  M Beveridge,et al.  Visual representation in analogical problem solving , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[33]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness , 2003 .

[34]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  The Backtalk of Self-Generated Sketches , 2003, Design Issues.

[35]  Thomas B Ward,et al.  Creative cognition as a window on creativity. , 2007, Methods.

[36]  Mark D. Gross,et al.  Constraints: Knowledge representation in design , 1988 .

[37]  M. Peterson Chapter 6 The Ambiguity of Mental Images: Insights Regarding the Structure of Shape Memory and Its Function in Creativity , 1993 .

[38]  W. Gordon Synectics: The Development of Creative Capacity , 1961 .

[39]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  Expertise and the use of visual analogy: implications for design education , 1999 .

[40]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Structure-Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy , 1983, Cogn. Sci..

[41]  D. Gentner,et al.  The analogical mind : perspectives from cognitive science , 2001 .

[42]  J. Shah,et al.  Collaborative Sketching (C-Sketch)--An Idea Generation Technique for Engineering Design. , 2001 .

[43]  Altshuller Creativity As an Exact Science , 1984 .

[44]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[45]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Schema induction and analogical transfer , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[46]  J. I The Design of Experiments , 1936, Nature.

[47]  Cees van Leeuwen,et al.  Book reviewImagery, creativity and discovery: A cognitive approach: B. Roskos-Ewoldsen, M. Intons-Peterson and R. Anderson (eds.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1993 , 1995 .

[48]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  INCREASING INNOVATION: PRESENTATION AND EVALUATION OF THE WORDTREE DESIGN- BY-ANALOGY METHOD , 2008 .

[49]  Keith J. Holyoak,et al.  The Pragmatics of Analogical Transfer , 1985 .

[50]  Jami J. Shah,et al.  Evaluation of idea generation methods for conceptual design: Effectiveness metrics and design of experiments , 2000 .

[51]  Douglas Hofstadter,et al.  A Review of Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought , 1995, AI Mag..

[52]  M. Scheerer,et al.  Problem Solving , 1967, Nature.

[53]  D. Gentner,et al.  Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. , 1997 .

[54]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .

[55]  K. Holyoak,et al.  The analogical mind. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[56]  Paul Thagard,et al.  Analogical Mapping by Constraint Satisfaction , 1989, Cogn. Sci..

[57]  John S. Gero,et al.  An ontology of situated design teams , 2007, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[58]  David J. Chalmers,et al.  High-level perception, representation, and analogy: a critique of artificial intelligence methodology , 1992, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[59]  S. Boulanger,et al.  Multi-strategy workspace navigation for design education , 2001 .

[60]  John S. Gero,et al.  Creativity, emergence and evolution in design , 1996, Knowl. Based Syst..

[61]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  Variances in the impact of visual stimuli on design problem solving performance , 2006 .

[62]  Masaki Suwa,et al.  Unexpected discoveries and S-invention of design requirements , 2000 .

[63]  Kamran Baig An act of creation , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[64]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Analogical problem solving , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[65]  Yan Jin,et al.  Impact of Mental Iteration on Concept Generation , 2006 .