Environmental assessment of multi-functional building elements constructed with digital fabrication techniques

PurposeDigital fabrication is revolutionizing architecture, enabling the construction of complex and multi-functional building elements. Multi-functionality is often achieved through material reduction strategies such as functional or material hybridization. However, these design strategies may increase environmental impacts over the life cycle. The integration of functions may hinder the maintenance and shorten the service life. Moreover, once a building element has reached the end of life, hybrid materials may influence negatively its recycling capacity. Consequently, the aim of this paper is to analyze the influence of multi-functionality in the environmental performance of two digitally fabricated architectural elements: The Sequential Roof and Concrete-Sandstone Composite Slab and to compare them with existing standard elements.MethodsA method based on the life-cycle assessment (LCA) framework is applied for the evaluation of the environmental implications of multi-functionality in digital fabrication. The evaluation consists of the comparison of embodied impacts between a multi-functional building element constructed with digital fabrication techniques and a conventional one, both with the same building functions. Specifically, the method considers the lifetime uncertainty caused by multi-functionality by considering two alternative service life scenarios during the evaluation of the digitally fabricated building element. The study is extended with a sensitivity analysis to evaluate the additional environmental implications during end-of-life processing derived from the use of hybrid materials to achieve multi-functionality in architecture.Results and discussionThe evaluation of two case studies of digitally fabricated architecture indicates that their environmental impacts are very sensitive to the duration of their service life. Considering production and life span phases, multi-functional building elements should have a minimum service life of 30 years to bring environmental benefits over conventional construction. Furthermore, the case study of Concrete-Sandstone Composite Slab shows that using hybrid materials to achieve multi-functionality carries important environmental consequences at the end of life, such as the emission of air pollutants during recycling.ConclusionsThe results from the case studies allow the identification of key environmental criteria to consider during the design of digitally fabricated building elements. Multi-functionality provides material efficiency during production, but design adaptability must be a priority to avoid a decrease in their environmental performance. Moreover, the high environmental impacts caused by end-of-life processing should be compensated during design.

[1]  Rolf Frischknecht,et al.  LCI modelling approaches applied on recycling of materials in view of environmental sustainability, risk perception and eco-efficiency , 2010 .

[2]  Andrei Jipa,et al.  THE SMART TAKES FROM THE STRONG:: 3D PRINTING STAY-IN-PLACE FORMWORK FOR CONCRETE SLAB CONSTRUCTION , 2017 .

[3]  Stephen Pickering,et al.  Recycling technologies for thermoset composite materials—current status , 2006 .

[4]  Geert De Schutter,et al.  Vision of 3D printing with concrete — Technical, economic and environmental potentials , 2018, Cement and Concrete Research.

[5]  Isolda Agustí-Juan,et al.  Environmental design guidelines for digital fabrication , 2017 .

[6]  Rob Boom,et al.  Recycling of composite materials , 2012 .

[7]  Niels De Temmerman,et al.  Transformable structures: Materialising design for change , 2017 .

[8]  Jeong Tai Kim,et al.  Energy efficiencies of linear-shaped multi-residential apartment buildings built with hybrid structural systems , 2012 .

[9]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[10]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[11]  Clément Gosselin,et al.  Large-scale 3D printing of ultra-high performance concrete – a new processing route for architects and builders , 2016 .

[12]  Fabio Gramazio,et al.  Robotic timber construction — Expanding additive fabrication to new dimensions , 2016 .

[13]  Guillaume Habert,et al.  End-of-life consideration for hybrid material systems , 2017 .

[14]  Jorge de Brito,et al.  Application of the factor method to the estimation of the service life of natural stone cladding , 2014 .

[15]  Neri Oxman MATERIAL COMPUTATION , 2019, Toward a Living Architecture?.

[16]  Jorge de Brito,et al.  Methodologies for Service Life Prediction of Buildings , 2016 .

[17]  Endrit Hoxha,et al.  Method to analyse the contribution of material's sensitivity in buildings' environmental impact , 2014 .

[18]  Andrei Jipa,et al.  The Smart Takes from the Strong , 2017 .

[19]  Melissa M. Bilec,et al.  Service life prediction of residential interior finishes for life cycle assessment , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[20]  Luisa F. Cabeza,et al.  Service life of the dwelling stock in Spain , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[21]  Yujue Wang,et al.  Characterization of hydrocarbon emissions from green sand foundry core binders by analytical pyrolysis. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  Nathalie Labonnote,et al.  Additive construction: State-of-the-art, challenges and opportunities , 2016 .

[23]  Norbert Lechner,et al.  Heating, Cooling, Lighting: Sustainable Design Methods for Architects , 2008 .

[24]  T. Nemecek,et al.  Overview and methodology: Data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3 , 2013 .

[25]  Jorge de Brito,et al.  Methodologies for Service Life Prediction of Buildings: With a Focus on Faade Claddings , 2016 .

[26]  U. Lahl Recycling of waste foundry sands , 1992 .

[27]  Eric Williams,et al.  Energy analysis of end-of-life options for personal computers: resell, upgrade, recycle , 2003, IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, 2003..

[28]  Florian Müller,et al.  Potential benefits of digital fabrication for complex structures: Environmental assessment of a robotically fabricated concrete wall , 2017 .

[29]  Andrei Jipa,et al.  3D-Printed Stay-in-Place Formwork for Topologically Optimized Concrete Slabs , 2016 .

[30]  Philippe Block,et al.  NEST HiLo: Investigating lightweight construction and adaptive energy systems , 2017 .

[31]  Neri Oxman,et al.  Material-based Design Computation An Inquiry into Digital Simulation of Physical Material Properties as Design Generators , 2007 .

[32]  Amanda Conroy,et al.  Composite recycling in the construction industry , 2006 .

[33]  Stewart Brand,et al.  How Buildings Learn: What Happens After They're Built , 1997 .