Genotype by environment model predictive ability in Miscanthus

Miscanthus is a genus of perennial grasses native to East Asia that shows promise as a biofuel energy source. Breeding efforts for increasing biofuel capability in this genus have focused on two species, namely M. sinensis (Msi) and M. sacchariflorus (Msa). For these efforts to succeed, it is critical that both Msi and Msa, as well as their interspecific crosses, can be grown at a wide range of latitudes. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate how well existing data from Msi and Msa trials grown at locations throughout the northern hemisphere can train state‐of‐the‐art genomic selection (GS) models to predict genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) of dry yield for untested Msi and Msa accessions in untested environments. We found that accounting for genotype by environment interaction in the GS model did not notably improve predictive ability. Additionally, we observed that locations at lower latitudes showed higher predictive ability relative to locations at higher latitudes. These results suggest that it is crucial to increase the number of trial locations at higher latitude locations to investigate the source of this correlation. This will make it possible to train GS models using data from environments that are similar to growing conditions at the locations targeted by Msi and Msa breeders. Such an increase of trial locations in target environments could pave the way toward advancing breeding efforts for overwintering ability in Msi and Msa, and ultimately support the potential of Miscanthus as a biofuel crop.

[1]  A. Lipka,et al.  Genome‐wide association and genomic prediction for yield and component traits of Miscanthus sacchariflorus , 2023, GCB Bioenergy.

[2]  S. Long,et al.  Biomass yield in a genetically diverse Miscanthus sacchariflorus germplasm panel phenotyped at five locations in Asia, North America, and Europe , 2023, GCB Bioenergy.

[3]  G. Graef,et al.  An Assessment of the Factors Influencing the Prediction Accuracy of Genomic Prediction Models Across Multiple Environments , 2021, Frontiers in Genetics.

[4]  A. Bentley,et al.  The Modern Plant Breeding Triangle: Optimizing the Use of Genomics, Phenomics, and Enviromics Data , 2021, Frontiers in Plant Science.

[5]  James C. Schnable,et al.  Utility of Climatic Information via Combining Ability Models to Improve Genomic Prediction for Yield Within the Genomes to Fields Maize Project , 2021, Frontiers in Genetics.

[6]  S. Long,et al.  Managing flowering time in Miscanthus and sugarcane to facilitate intra- and intergeneric crosses , 2020, bioRxiv.

[7]  S. Long,et al.  Training Population Optimization for Genomic Selection in Miscanthus , 2020, G3.

[8]  S. Long,et al.  Biomass yield in a genetically diverse Miscanthus sinensis germplasm panel evaluated at five locations revealed individuals with exceptional potential , 2019, GCB Bioenergy.

[9]  S. Long,et al.  Genome‐wide association and genomic prediction for biomass yield in a genetically diverse Miscanthus sinensis germplasm panel phenotyped at five locations in Asia and North America , 2019, GCB Bioenergy.

[10]  S. Long,et al.  Winter hardiness of Miscanthus (III): Genome‐wide association and genomic prediction for overwintering ability in Miscanthus sinensis , 2019, GCB Bioenergy.

[11]  I. Donnison,et al.  Genomic index selection provides a pragmatic framework for setting and refining multi-objective breeding targets in Miscanthus , 2018, Annals of botany.

[12]  Roger A. Moraga,et al.  Predictive ability of genomic selection models in a multi-population perennial ryegrass training set using genotyping-by-sequencing , 2017, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[13]  C. Müller,et al.  Temperature increase reduces global yields of major crops in four independent estimates , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  J. Poland,et al.  Increasing Genomic‐Enabled Prediction Accuracy by Modeling Genotype × Environment Interactions in Kansas Wheat , 2017, The plant genome.

[15]  Samuel Asumadu-Sarkodie,et al.  A review of renewable energy sources, sustainability issues and climate change mitigation , 2016 .

[16]  Junhua Peng,et al.  Genetic variation in Miscanthus × giganteus and the importance of estimating genetic distance thresholds for differentiating clones , 2015 .

[17]  Junhua Peng,et al.  Genetic structure of Miscanthus sinensis and Miscanthus sacchariflorus in Japan indicates a gradient of bidirectional but asymmetric introgression , 2015, Journal of experimental botany.

[18]  S. Long,et al.  A footprint of past climate change on the diversity and population structure of Miscanthus sinensis. , 2014, Annals of botany.

[19]  D. Akdemir,et al.  Integrating environmental covariates and crop modeling into the genomic selection framework to predict genotype by environment interactions , 2014, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[20]  M. Calus,et al.  A reaction norm model for genomic selection using high-dimensional genomic and environmental data , 2013, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[21]  Kerrie Farrar,et al.  Genome-wide association studies and prediction of 17 traits related to phenology, biomass and cell wall composition in the energy grass Miscanthus sinensis , 2013, The New phytologist.

[22]  A. Hastings,et al.  The development of MISCANFOR, a new Miscanthus crop growth model: towards more robust yield predictions under different climatic and soil conditions , 2009 .

[23]  Stephen P. Long,et al.  Meeting US biofuel goals with less land: the potential of Miscanthus , 2008 .

[24]  A. Faaij,et al.  Potential of biomass energy out to 2100, for four IPCC SRES land-use scenarios , 2005 .

[25]  R. Finger,et al.  Economic evaluation of Miscanthus production - a review. , 2016 .

[26]  J. Juvik,et al.  The Gene Pool of Miscanthus Species and Its Improvement , 2013 .