Consistency conditions and linear reconstruction methods in diffraction tomography

Because an image can be reconstructed from knowledge of its Radon transform (RT), the task of reconstructing an image is tantamount to that of estimating its RT. Based upon the Fourier diffraction projection (FDP) theorem, from the statistical perspective of unbiased reduction of image variance, the author previously proposed an infinite family of estimation methods for obtaining the RT from the scattered data in diffraction tomography (DT). In this work, using the FDP theorem, the authors define the diffraction Radon transform (DRT), which can be treated as the data function in DT. Subsequently, using strategies similar to those that analyze the consistency conditions on the exponential Radon transform in two-dimensional (2-D) single-photon emission computed tomography with uniform attenuation, the author studied the consistency condition on the DRT and the author shows that there is a hierarchy of estimation methods that actually project the noisy data function onto its consistency space in different ways. In terms of a weighted inner product of the consistency and inconsistency parts of a noisy data function, the author further demonstrates that a subset of the family of estimation methods can be interpreted as orthogonal projections onto the consistency space of the DRT. In particular, the statistically suboptimal estimation method in the family corresponds to an orthogonal projection associated with an ordinary inner product of the consistency and inconsistency parts of a noisy data function.

[1]  M. Kaveh,et al.  Reconstructive tomography and applications to ultrasonics , 1979, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[2]  A. Devaney A filtered backpropagation algorithm for diffraction tomography. , 1982, Ultrasonic imaging.

[3]  A. Kak,et al.  A computational study of reconstruction algorithms for diffraction tomography: Interpolation versus filtered-backpropagation , 1983 .

[4]  Malcolm Slaney,et al.  Diffraction Tomography , 1983, Other Conferences.

[5]  A. Devaney Geophysical Diffraction Tomography , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[6]  F. Natterer The Mathematics of Computerized Tomography , 1986 .

[7]  D. Rouseff,et al.  Diffraction tomography and the stochastic inverse scattering problem , 1991 .

[8]  Anthony J. Devaney,et al.  Stochastic diffraction tomography: Theory and computer simulation , 1993, Signal Process..

[9]  Michael P. Andre,et al.  A New Consideration of Diffraction Computed Tomography for Breast Imaging: Studies in Phantoms and Patients , 1995 .

[10]  Xiaochuan Pan,et al.  A unified analysis of exact methods of inverting the 2-D exponential radon transform, with implications for noise control in SPECT , 1995, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[11]  E. Wolf,et al.  Theory of diffraction tomography for quasi-homogeneous random objects , 1997 .

[12]  X. Pan,et al.  Unified reconstruction theory for diffraction tomography, with consideration of noise control. , 1998, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[13]  E. Clarkson Projections onto the range of the exponential Radon transform and reconstruction algorithms , 1999 .