论文信息 - Optimal phase difference reconstruction: comparison of two methods.

Optimal phase difference reconstruction: comparison of two methods.

The present study compares the performance of the weighted mean (WM) and sensitivity encoding (SENSE) methods for reconstructing phase difference images over a large range of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). It is found that the WM algorithm is suboptimal, compared to the SENSE method at low SNR. Numerical simulations, phantom and in vivo results are presented.

Mark Bydder | Thomas T Liu | Kun Lu

[1] P. Boesiger,et al. SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2] Mark W. Woolrich,et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL , 2004, NeuroImage.

[3] P. Roemer,et al. The NMR phased array , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4] N J Pelc,et al. Reconstructions of phase contrast, phased array multicoil data , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5] D. Larkman,et al. Combination of signals from array coils using image‐based estimation of coil sensitivity profiles , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6] C. Craig. On the Frequency Function of $xy$ , 1936 .

[7] T E Conturo,et al. Signal‐to‐noise in phase angle reconstruction: Dynamic range extension using phase reference offsets , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8] Matts Karlsson,et al. Comparison of different methods for combining phase-contrast images obtained with multiple coils. , 2005, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[9] D. O. Walsh,et al. Adaptive reconstruction of phased array MR imagery , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.