Tolerance analysis of overconstrained and flexible assemblies by polytopes and finite element computations: application to a flange

In industrial contexts, overconstrained assemblies are often used to ensure sufficient stiffness and accuracy of assembly. Such architectures are quite usual, however, analysis and synthesis of the tolerance are not easy to define and quantify. In these cases, the compliance of the assembly is not automatic and deformations may often occur, requiring a particular and difficult analysis of the assembly from scientific and computing points of view.The present work addresses such overconstrained mechanisms through a general and a sequential approach. Based on this, it is possible to determine the final assembly condition (with or without interference) as a function of part defects. First, the assembly procedure is performed based on polytope computations, assuming a rigid part behavior. From this, a stochastic simulation is performed and some non-compliant assemblies (assemblies with interferences) are identified. For these assemblies, the rigid behavior of parts is then overcome by means of finite element simulations and a typical procedure is set up to introduce part defects. We then deduce whether the assembly can be made from the load needed to assemble the parts. This procedure is applied to a flange composed of five pin/hole pairs, as this is a highly overconstrained mechanism.

[1]  Pier Paolo Valentini,et al.  Investigation on pin-hole connection in flexible assembly , 2005 .

[2]  Joseph K. Davidson,et al.  Using Tolerance-Maps to Generate Frequency Distributions of Clearance and Allocate Tolerances for Pin-Hole Assemblies , 2007, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[3]  Sven Sch.  Quadratic Programming in Geometric Optimization: Theory, Implementation, and Applications , 2002 .

[4]  Denis Teissandier,et al.  Tolerance Analysis With Polytopes in HV-Description , 2016, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[5]  R. Arrieux,et al.  Clearance Space in Volumic Dimensioning , 1992 .

[6]  Chevassus Nicolas,et al.  A New Approach for Best Fit Assembly Based on the Behaviour of Components , 2006 .

[7]  Denis Teissandier,et al.  Operations on polytopes: application to tolerance analysis , 2011, ArXiv.

[8]  Joseph K. Davidson,et al.  A New Mathematical Model for Geometric Tolerances as Applied to Round Faces , 2002 .

[9]  Jean-Yves Dantan,et al.  Worst-case and statistical tolerance analysis based on quantified constraint satisfaction problems and Monte Carlo simulation , 2009, Comput. Aided Des..

[10]  Serge Samper,et al.  Simultaneous analysis method for tolerancing flexible mechanisms , 2003 .

[11]  Max Giordano,et al.  A Generic Method for the Worst Case and Statistical Tridimensional Tolerancing Analysis , 2013 .

[12]  Jaime A. Camelio,et al.  Modeling and Control of Compliant Assembly Systems , 2006 .

[13]  Bernard Anselmetti.  CLIC: A Method for Geometrical Specification of Products , 2013 .

[14]  Joseph K. Davidson,et al.  Navigating the Tolerance Analysis Maze , 2007 .

[15]  Doriane Gouyou,et al.  Tolerance Analysis by Polytopes: Application to Assembly Interferences Diagnosis , 2016 .

[16]  François Thiébaut,et al.  Assembly Simulation of Flexible Parts through the fitting of Linkage Devices , 2007 .

[17]  Denis Teissandier,et al.  Tolerance analysis of a product coupling geometric and architectural specifications in a probabilistic approach , 2013 .

[18]  Byeng D. Youn,et al.  Variation Propagation Analysis on Compliant Assemblies Considering Contact Interaction , 2007 .

[19]  Rikard Söderberg,et al.  Computer-aided robustness analysis for compliant assemblies , 2006 .

[20]  Pierre Vacher,et al.  Contribution of heterogeneous strain field measurements and boundary conditions modelling in inverse identification of material parameters , 2011 .

[21]  Joshua U. Turner,et al.  Review of statistical approaches to tolerance analysis , 1995, Comput. Aided Des..

[22]  Daniel W. Apley,et al.  Tolerance allocation for compliant beam structure assemblies , 2003 .

[23]  John Tyson,et al.  Biomechanics deformation and strain measurements with 3D image correlation photogrammetry , 2002 .

[24]  François Thiébaut,et al.  Integrating the flexibility of components in the assembly of aeronautics hydraulic systems , 2007 .

[25]  Alan Fleming,et al.  Geometric Relationships Between Toleranced Features , 1988, Artif. Intell..

[26]  Joseph K. Davidson,et al.  Representing stresses that arise in parallel assemblies that contain imperfect geometry allowed by tolerances , 2012, DAC 2012.

[27]  Pierre Bourdet,et al.  A Study of Optimal-Criteria Identification Based on the Small-Displacement Screw Model , 1988 .

[28]  Pierre Bourdet,et al.  Geometrical Study of Assembly Behaviour, Taking into Accounts Rigid Components’ Deviations, Actual Geometric Variations and Deformations , 2007 .

[29]  Nicolas Gayton,et al.  Statistical tolerance analysis of over-constrained mechanisms with gaps using system reliability methods , 2013, Comput. Aided Des..

[30]  Joseph K. Davidson,et al.  Tolerance analysis of parallel assemblies using Tolerance-Maps® and a functional Map derived from induced deformations , 2013, DAC 2013.

[31]  J. U. Turner.  A Feasibility Space Approach for Automated Tolerancing , 1993 .

[32]  Joseph K. Davidson,et al.  Comparison of Two Similar Mathematical Models for Tolerance Analysis: T-Map and Deviation Domain , 2013 .

[33]  Jean-Pierre Nadeau,et al.  Variational tolerancing analysis taking thermomechanical strains into account: Application to a high pressure turbine , 2014 .

[34]  Gaurav Ameta,et al.  Comparison of Spatial Math Models for Tolerance Analysis: Tolerance-Maps, Deviation Domain, and TTRS , 2011, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..