Perpetual Asphalt Pavement Response Analysis on under Heavy Loads in Northeast Area of China

Severe rutting, cracks and moisture damage are presented on conventional semi-rigid base asphalt pavements not long after completed in China. This phenomenon indicates that conventional philosophy on pavement design could not meet more and more frequent and heavy vehicle. With high structural capacity for high traffic volume and heavy loads, the Perpetual Asphalt Pavements (PAPs) solve those problems well. Meanwhile they need minimal or no major structural rehabilitation and/or reconstruction exercises in their life, which ensures low user-delay.Three PAPs, including semi-rigid base asphalt pavement, flexible base asphalt pavement, and combined base asphalt pavement, are put forward for the northeast area in China considering its climate, traffic characteristic. Finite element method is utilized to analyze response of PAPs under heavy loads. Two key factors, i.e. tensile horizontal strains at the bottom of asphalt layers and compressive vertical strains are investigated. Also the capacities of the structures on bearing overloading are estimated. Four types of wheel and axle, including single axle and single tire, single axle and dual tires, dual axles and dual tires, and tri axles and dual tires are adopted in finite element models. The shapes of tire-pavement contact area are either circular or rectangular to simulate standard load or overloading respectively. When rectangular shapes are adopted, the contact area sizes and the distribution of pressure are varied. Conventional asphalt concrete and high modulus asphalt concrete are adopted. Simulations are done. The competences of the three pavement structures on fulfilling long lives are evaluated.

[1]  C. L. Monismith,et al.  Overlay Design for Cracked and Seated Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) Pavement—Interstate Route 710 , 1999 .

[2]  M Buncher,et al.  Determination of threshold strain level for fatigue endurance limit in asphalt mixtures , 2004 .

[3]  A Loulizi,et al.  Inability of the elastic-layered theory to predict pavement vertical stresses , 2004 .

[4]  James A. Sherwood,et al.  Component Dowel-Bar Model for Load-Transfer Systems in PCC Pavements , 1995 .

[5]  S H Carpenter,et al.  Design principles for long lasting HMA pavements , 2004 .

[6]  Swati Roy Maitra,et al.  Load Transfer Characteristics of Dowel Bar System in Jointed Concrete Pavement , 2009 .

[7]  D H Timm,et al.  The effects of load spectra and variability on perpetual pavement design , 2004 .

[8]  Carl L Monismith,et al.  Modern Pavement Design Technology Including Dynamic Load Conditions , 1988 .

[9]  M De Beer,et al.  DETERMINATION OF PNEUMATIC TYRE/PAVEMENT INTERFACE CONTACT STRESSES UNDER MOVING LOADS AND SOME EFFECTS ON PAVEMENTS WITH THIN ASPHALT SURFACING LAYERS , 1997 .

[10]  Samir N. Shoukry,et al.  3D Finite Element Analysis of Temperature‐Induced Stresses in Dowel Jointed Concrete Pavements , 2001 .

[11]  G. Thenoux,et al.  THREE-DIMENSIONAL FINITE ELEMENT MODEL FOR FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT ANALYSES BASED ON FIELD MODULUS MEASUREMENTS , 2008 .

[12]  George Turkiyyah,et al.  Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Jointed Plain Concrete Pavement with EverFE2.2 , 2003 .

[13]  Imad L. Al-Qadi,et al.  In-situ validation of mechanistic pavement finite element modeling , 2004 .

[14]  Imad L. Al-Qadi,et al.  Effect of Surface Tangential Contact Stresses on Flexible Pavement Response (With Discussion) , 2007 .

[15]  Ernest J. Barenberg,et al.  FINITE-ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF JOINTED OR CRACKED CONCRETE PAVEMENTS , 1978 .

[16]  John T. Tielking,et al.  TIRE CONTACT PRESSURE AND ITS EFFECT ON PAVEMENT STRAIN , 1987 .