Fostering Green Communities Through Civic Engagement: Community-Based Environmental Stewardship in the Portland Area

Problem: Urban development can fragment natural habitats, alter hydrologic systems, and modify energy flows and nutrient cycles. The literature on mitigating ecological impacts of urban development contains extensive support for engineered infrastructure, but few studies have characterized the factors that foster effective involvement of community members in urban ecological restoration. Purpose: This article aims to explain why one community-initiated environmental stewardship program has been successful, and offers lessons on how to use community resources to establish similar programs elsewhere. We ask: (1) How can citizens become more involved in the stewardship of their local watershed? (2) What is the optimal mix of local technical expertise and community capacity? and (3) What innovations and accommodations must public agencies make to improve community involvement in environmental stewardship? Methods: We draw on data from surveys, interviews, and participant reports from 12 years of Portland's Community Watershed Stewardship Program (CWSP) to characterize the prerequisites to developing an effective community-based environmental management program. Results and conclusions: We conclude that programs encouraging the public to participate in environmental planning and stewardship need flexibility to allow innovation and accommodation in the planning process. We observe that community partners have great success completing projects they themselves initiate, and that are physically located nearby. We also find that developing a partnership with a local university was an important component of this effective environmental stewardship program. Takeaway for practice: Community-based watershed stewardship programs, if designed correctly, have the potential to increase citizen trust in government, improve the biophysical environment, and foster participants' ecological understanding. Involving the community in urban watershed management programs fills gaps between what public institutions can achieve and what the community needs. This coproduction provides opportunities for citizens to develop ownership of the local landscape, which may in turn increase the number of community groups involved, and the overall geographic reach of restoration projects. Research support: None

[1]  M. Lubell,et al.  Do Watershed Partnerships Enhance Beliefs Conducive to Collective Action ? , 2022 .

[2]  T. Lauber,et al.  FAIRNESS IN MOOSE MANAGEMENT DECISION-MAKING : THE CITIZENS' PERSPECTIVE , 1997 .

[3]  J. Wondolleck.  Public Lands Conflict and Resolution , 1988, Environment, Development, and Public Policy.

[4]  Geneva Perry.  Guess Who's Coming to Dinner , 1999 .

[5]  Alexander Conley,et al.  Evaluating Collaborative Natural ResourceManagement , 2003 .

[6]  Steven L. Yaffee,et al.  Ecosystem Management in the United States: An Assessment Of Current Experience , 1996 .

[7]  David M. Konisky,et al.  Innovations in Public Participation and Environmental Decision Making: Examples from the Great Lakes Region , 2001 .

[8]  J. Meyer,et al.  Stream ecosystem function in urbanizing landscapes , 2005, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[9]  Douglas S. Kenney,et al.  The New Watershed Source Book: A Directory and Review of Watershed Initiatives in the Western United States , 2000 .

[10]  Seanna M. Kerrigan,et al.  The Heart of the Matter: Aligning Curriculum, Pedagogy and Engagement in Higher Education , 2006 .

[11]  L. Duram,et al.  Insights and Applications Assessing Public Participation in U.S. Watershed Planning Initiatives , 1999 .

[12]  C. Chess.  Evaluating Environmental Public Participation: Methodological Questions , 2000 .

[13]  C. Raffensperger.  Guess Who's Coming For Dinner: The Scientist and the Public Making Good Environmental Decisions , 1998 .

[14]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[15]  Thomas Webler.  Organizing Public Participation: A Critical Review of Three Handbooks , 1997 .

[16]  Michael Fagence,et al.  Citizen Participation in Planning , 1977 .

[17]  Richard J. Borden,et al.  A River Runs Through It: A College-Community Collaboration for Watershed-based Regional Planning and Education 1,2 , 2007 .

[18]  Robert W. Adler,et al.  Addressing Barriers to Watershed Protection , 1995 .

[19]  Geoffrey J. Syme,et al.  Policy Review Evaluating Integrated Resource Management , 1999 .

[20]  Stephen Stec,et al.  Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters , 1999, International Legal Materials.

[21]  Stephen Mckenzie.  Social sustainability: towards some definitions , 2004 .

[22]  H. Fineberg,et al.  Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society , 1996 .

[23]  Steven Edward Cohrun.  Understanding and Enhancing Neighborhood Sense of Community , 1994 .

[24]  K. Backman,et al.  Coproduction of recreation services. , 1997 .

[25]  D. Day.  Citizen Participation in the Planning Process: An Essentially Contested Concept? , 1997 .

[26]  Michael W. Mullen,et al.  STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT AND SOCIAL CAPITAL: KEYS TO WATERSHED MANAGEMENT SUCCESS IN ALABAMA 1 , 1999 .

[27]  L. Sax,et al.  How Undergraduates Are Affected by Service Participation. , 1998 .

[28]  Andrew Parker,et al.  Knowing What We Know: Supporting Knowledge Creation and Sharing in Social Networks , 2001 .

[29]  R. Chaskin.  Building Community Capacity , 2001 .

[30]  L. G. Smith,et al.  FORUM: The Converging Dynamics of Interest Representation in Resources Management , 1997, Environmental management.

[31]  E. Ostrom.  Institutional Rational Choice , 2019, Theories of the Policy Process.

[32]  E. Etzioni-Halevy.  Bureaucracy and democracy: A political dilemma , 1983 .

[33]  W. Zipperer,et al.  Ecosystem processes along an urban-to-rural gradient , 2005, Urban Ecosystems.

[34]  N. Grimm,et al.  Global Change and the Ecology of Cities , 2008, Science.

[35]  Diana C. Parry,et al.  Building Relationships, Accessing Resources: Mobilizing Social Capital in Community Garden Contexts , 2005 .

[36]  R. J. Berry,et al.  Environmental stewardship , 1994, Nature.

[37]  Julia M. Wondolleck,et al.  The importance of process in resolving environmental disputes , 1985 .

[38]  L. Wagenet,et al.  Organizing Citizen Engagement for Democratic Environmental Planning , 2007 .

[39]  David Beetham.  Theorising Democracy and Local Government , 1996 .

[40]  C. Ryan,et al.  Collaborative Watershed Planning in Washington State: Implementing the Watershed Planning Act , 2005 .

[41]  W. Galston.  Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community , 2001 .

[42]  Timothy Beatley,et al.  The Ecology of Place: Planning for Environment, Economy, and Community , 1997 .

[43]  Arild Vatn,et al.  Institutions And The Environment , 2005 .

[44]  C. Stivers.  The Public Agency as Polis , 1990 .

[45]  S. Lurie,et al.  Some community socio-economic benefits of watershed councils: A case study from Oregon , 2006 .

[46]  M. E. Patterson,et al.  Barriers to Effective Natural Resource Planning in a "Messy" World , 2003 .

[47]  S. Moore.  The role of trust in social networks: formation, function and fragility , 1995 .

[48]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[49]  D. Roush.  Making collaboration work : lessons from innovation in natural resource management , 2002 .

[50]  Ross Prizzia.  Community Involvement in Protecting the Environment: The Role of Restoration Advisory Boards (RABs) , 2005 .

[51]  Michael Woolcock,et al.  Using Social Capital to Help Integrate Planning Theory, Research, and Practice: Preface , 2004 .

[52]  John Bessant,et al.  Effective Innovation Policy: A New Approach , 1997 .

[53]  V. Shandas.  An Empirical Study of Streamside Landowners' Interest in Riparian Conservation , 2007 .

[54]  P. Sabatier.  Swimming upstream : collaborative approaches to watershed management , 2005 .