The assessment of 3D printer technology for forensic comparative analysis

ABSTRACT Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology is a layer-by-layer building tool that uses a variety of engineering processes and materials. It has many applications in the automobile, medical, aerospace and fashion industries, as well as for the 3D-printing hobbyist. Currently, there are seven main types of 3D printers, which can be categorized according to the engineering process used. Cost reductions and the increased quality of personal 3D printers are making them more affordable and accessible to organizations and individuals for potential criminal purposes. This review is an assessment of 3D printer engineering features and the materials used. This is crucial in understanding the potential application and development of forensic techniques to identify a printer source, and in the comparison of printed materials that may have been used in alleged criminal activity.

[1]  M Nakamura,et al.  Biomatrices and biomaterials for future developments of bioprinting and biofabrication , 2010, Biofabrication.

[2]  Robert L. Bowerman,et al.  Introduction to the Additive Manufacturing Powder Metallurgy Supply Chain , 2015 .

[3]  Albert Folch,et al.  The upcoming 3D-printing revolution in microfluidics. , 2016, Lab on a chip.

[4]  Joshua M. Pearce,et al.  Mechanical properties of components fabricated with open-source 3-D printers under realistic environmental conditions , 2014 .

[5]  Seied Omid Keyhan,et al.  Three-Dimensional Printing: A Novel Technology for Use in Oral and Maxillofacial Operations , 2016 .

[6]  Michal Ackermann,et al.  CHEMICAL RESISTANCE OF MATERIALS USED IN ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING , 2016 .

[7]  Ming-Chuan Leu,et al.  Additive manufacturing: technology, applications and research needs , 2013, Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering.

[8]  Olaf Diegel,et al.  Wohlers Report 2018: 3D printing and additive manufacturing state of the industry: Annual Worldwide Progress Report , 2017 .

[9]  Paolo Colombo,et al.  Additive Manufacturing of Ceramics: Issues, Potentialities, and Opportunities , 2015 .

[10]  J C Middleton,et al.  Synthetic biodegradable polymers as orthopedic devices. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[11]  Julien Gardan,et al.  Additive manufacturing technologies: state of the art and trends , 2016 .

[12]  Xin Wang,et al.  3D printing of polymer matrix composites: A review and prospective , 2017 .

[13]  A. Södergård,et al.  Industrial Production of High Molecular Weight Poly(Lactic Acid) , 2010 .

[14]  Elsa Reichmanis,et al.  Photopolymer Materials and Processes for Advanced Technologies , 2014 .

[15]  A. Bandyopadhyay,et al.  Bone tissue engineering using 3D printing , 2013 .

[16]  Hamideh Gholizadeh,et al.  Application of Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) Method of 3D Printing in Drug Delivery. , 2016, Current pharmaceutical design.

[17]  Barry Berman,et al.  3D printing: the new industrial revolution , 2012, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[18]  Jeffrey W Stansbury,et al.  3D printing with polymers: Challenges among expanding options and opportunities. , 2016, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[19]  Vladimir Mironov,et al.  Review: bioprinting: a beginning. , 2006, Tissue engineering.

[20]  Aaron M. Forster,et al.  Materials Testing Standards for Additive Manufacturing of Polymer Materials: State of the Art and Standards Applicability , 2015 .

[21]  Robert Bogue,et al.  3D printing: the dawn of a new era in manufacturing? , 2013 .