Quantification of model-form and predictive uncertainty for multi-physics simulation

Traditional uncertainty quantification in multi-physics design problems involves the propagation of parametric uncertainties in input variables such as structural or aerodynamic properties through a single, or series of models constructed to represent the given physical scenario. These models are inherently imprecise, and thus introduce additional sources of error to the design problem. In addition, there often exists multiple models to represent the given situation, and complete confidence in selecting the most accurate model among the model set considered is beyond the capability of the user. Thus, quantification of the errors introduced by this modeling process is a necessary step in the complete quantification of the uncertainties in multi-physics design problems. In this work, a modeling uncertainty quantification framework was developed to quantify to quantify both the model-form and predictive uncertainty in a design problem through the use of existing methods as well as newly developed modifications to existing methods in the literature. The applicability of this framework to a problem involving full-scale simulation was then demonstrated using the AGARD 445.6 Weakened Wing and three different aeroelastic simulation packages to quantify the flutter conditions of the wing.

[1]  Chris L. Pettit,et al.  Uncertainty Quantification in Aeroelasticity: Recent Results and Research Challenges , 2004 .

[2]  Helmut J. Pradlwarter,et al.  Realistic and efficient reliability estimation for aerospace structures , 2005 .

[3]  C. Guedes Soares Quantification of Model Uncertainty in Structural Reliability , 1997 .

[4]  Her Mann Tsai,et al.  Calculation of Wing Flutter by a Coupled Fluid-Structure Method , 2001 .

[5]  J. Lawrence,et al.  Application of the ENS3DAE Euler/Navier-Stokes Aeroelastic Method , 1997 .

[6]  Mohammad H. Kurdi,et al.  Uncertainty Quantification of the Goland+ Wing's Flutter Boundary , 2007 .

[7]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  Model uncertainty and Bayesian updating in reliability-based inspection , 2000 .

[8]  George E. Apostolakis,et al.  Including model uncertainty in risk-informed decision making , 2006 .

[9]  Enrique López Droguett,et al.  Bayesian Methodology for Model Uncertainty Using Model Performance Data , 2008, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[10]  Ramana V. Grandhi,et al.  Using random set theory to calculate reliability bounds for a wing structure , 2006 .

[11]  C. Guedes Soares Probabilistic methods for structural design , 1997 .

[12]  John T. Batina,et al.  Wing flutter boundary prediction using unsteady Euler aerodynamic method , 1993 .

[13]  Lincoln E. Moses,et al.  Elementary Decision Theory , 1959 .

[14]  Ali Mosleh,et al.  The Assessment of Probability Distributions from Expert Opinions with an Application to Seismic Fragility Curves , 1986 .

[15]  Edward E. Leamer,et al.  Specification Searches: Ad Hoc Inference with Nonexperimental Data , 1980 .

[16]  Russ D. Rausch,et al.  Three-dimensional time-marching aeroelastic analyses using an unstructured-grid Euler method , 1992 .

[17]  M. Elisabeth Paté-Cornell,et al.  Uncertainties in risk analysis: Six levels of treatment , 1996 .

[18]  T. Fine,et al.  The Emergence of Probability , 1976 .

[19]  G. A. Barnard,et al.  New Methods of Quality Control , 1963 .

[20]  Sylvia Richardson,et al.  Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice , 1997 .

[21]  Ramana V. Grandhi,et al.  Optimization of a wing structure for gust response and aileron effectiveness , 2003 .

[22]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Two methods for the structured assessment of model uncertainty by experts in performance assessments of radioactive waste repositories , 1996 .

[23]  Vladik Kreinovich,et al.  Propagating uncertainty through a quadratic response surface model , 2008 .