Operational Characterization of Divisibility of Dynamical Maps.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. Bae,et al. No-signaling principle can determine optimal quantum state discrimination. , 2011, Physical review letters.
[2] Feller William,et al. An Introduction To Probability Theory And Its Applications , 1950 .
[3] A. Rajagopal,et al. Kraus representation of quantum evolution and fidelity as manifestations of Markovian and non-Markovian forms , 2010, 1007.4498.
[4] J. Kofler,et al. No Fine Theorem for Macrorealism: Limitations of the Leggett-Garg Inequality. , 2015, Physical review letters.
[5] C. P. Sun,et al. Quantum Fisher information flow and non-Markovian processes of open systems , 2009, 0912.0587.
[6] Bernhard H. Haak,et al. Open Quantum Systems , 2019, Tutorials, Schools, and Workshops in the Mathematical Sciences.
[7] G. Lindblad. On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups , 1976 .
[8] Thierry Paul,et al. Quantum computation and quantum information , 2007, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science.
[9] D. Chruściński,et al. Witnessing non-Markovianity of quantum evolution , 2012, 1210.8079.
[10] Sabrina Maniscalco,et al. Non-Markovianity as a Resource for Quantum Technologies , 2013, 1301.2585.
[11] Gerardo Adesso,et al. Characterizing non-Markovianity via quantum interferometric power , 2015, 1501.02335.
[12] T. Cubitt,et al. The complexity of divisibility , 2014, Linear algebra and its applications.
[13] S. Luo,et al. Quantifying non-Markovianity via correlations , 2012 .
[14] C. H. Oh,et al. Alternative non-Markovianity measure by divisibility of dynamical maps , 2011, 1102.4659.
[15] S. Luo,et al. Comparing quantum Markovianities: Distinguishability versus correlations , 2013 .
[16] J. Watrous,et al. All entangled states are useful for channel discrimination. , 2009, Physical Review Letters.
[17] M. Wilde. Quantum Information Theory: Noisy Quantum Shannon Theory , 2013 .
[18] E. Sudarshan,et al. Completely Positive Dynamical Semigroups of N Level Systems , 1976 .
[19] Elsi-Mari Laine,et al. Colloquium: Non-Markovian dynamics in open quantum systems , 2015, 1505.01385.
[20] A. Kitaev. Quantum computations: algorithms and error correction , 1997 .
[21] Robert König,et al. The Operational Meaning of Min- and Max-Entropy , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.
[22] D. Chruściński,et al. Degree of non-Markovianity of quantum evolution. , 2013, Physical review letters.
[23] S. Maniscalco,et al. Non-Markovianity and reservoir memory of quantum channels: a quantum information theory perspective , 2014, Scientific Reports.
[24] M. Paternostro,et al. Geometrical characterization of non-Markovianity , 2013, 1302.6673.
[25] Michael M. Wolf,et al. Quantum Subdivision Capacities and Continuous-Time Quantum Coding , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.
[26] Susana F Huelga,et al. Entanglement and non-markovianity of quantum evolutions. , 2009, Physical review letters.
[27] Elsi-Mari Laine,et al. Markovianity and non-Markovianity in quantum and classical systems , 2011, 1106.0138.
[28] Jyrki Piilo,et al. Measure for the degree of non-markovian behavior of quantum processes in open systems. , 2009, Physical review letters.
[29] H. Yuen. Quantum detection and estimation theory , 1978, Proceedings of the IEEE.
[30] Garg,et al. Quantum mechanics versus macroscopic realism: Is the flux there when nobody looks? , 1985, Physical review letters.
[31] S. Huelga,et al. Quantum non-Markovianity: characterization, quantification and detection , 2014, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.
[32] U. Weiss. Quantum Dissipative Systems , 1993 .
[33] Loss of coherence and memory effects in quantum dynamics , 2012 .
[34] D. Sherrington. Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry , 1983 .
[35] J. Cirac,et al. Dividing Quantum Channels , 2006, math-ph/0611057.
[36] J. Bell. On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox , 1964 .
[37] Franco Nori,et al. Quantifying Non-Markovianity with Temporal Steering. , 2015, Physical review letters.
[38] J Eisert,et al. Assessing non-Markovian quantum dynamics. , 2007, Physical review letters.
[39] G M D'Ariano,et al. Using entanglement improves the precision of quantum measurements. , 2001, Physical review letters.