Intra- and interexaminer reliability of anthropometric measurements of term infants.

BACKGROUND The reliability of anthropometric measurements of term infants has not been studied sufficiently to determine if these measurements are reliable enough to be used in clinical practice and research. This study described the intra- and interexaminer reliability of the following anthropometric measurements: weight (WT), head circumference (HC), chest circumference (CC), abdominal circumference (AC), mid-arm circumference (MAC), and length. METHODS A convenience sample of 50 clinically stable term infants was studied. Two examiners obtained the six measurements twice using blank tape measures. The order of examiners was randomized and the examiners were masked to their own and the other examiners' measurements. RESULTS The intraexaminer mean absolute differences were as follows: WT = 1.88, 3.28 g; HC = 0.29, 0.29 cm; CC = 0.50, 0.78 cm; AC = 0.71, 0.77 cm; MAC = 0.36, 0.39 cm; length = 0.92, 1.18 cm. The interexaminer mean absolute differences were as follows: WT = 1.94, 1.66 g; HC = 0.37, 0.36 cm; CC = 0.59, 0.72 cm; AC = 0.99, 0.77 cm; MAC = 0.41, 0.57 cm; length = 1.57, 1.47 cm. CONCLUSIONS These findings indicate that intraexaminer differences tended to be smaller than interexaminer differences for all measures except weight, which remained stable for intra- and interexaminer comparisons. These findings also suggest that weight and head circumference were the most reliable measures, whereas length and mid-arm circumference were the least reliable measures.

[1]  D. Davies,et al.  Neonatometer , 1972, Archives of disease in childhood.

[2]  J. Engstrom.  Assessment of the reliability of physical measures. , 1988, Research in nursing & health.

[3]  S. Bhargava,et al.  Mid-arm and chest circumferences at birth as predictors of low birth weight and neonatal mortality in the community. , 1985, British medical journal.

[4]  R. O. Davis,et al.  Anthropometric Assessment of Body Size Differences of Full-Term Male and Female Infants , 1993, Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[5]  O. P. Gray,et al.  Length measurement in small neonates. , 1985, Archives of disease in childhood.

[6]  P. Catalano,et al.  Evaluation of Fetal Growth by Estimation of Neonatal Body Composition , 1992, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  M Lampl,et al.  Saltation and stasis: a model of human growth. , 1992, Science.

[8]  R. O. Davis,et al.  Black-White Differences in Newborn Anthropometric Measurements , 1991, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  T. Cole,et al.  Head circumference/abdominal circumference ratio, ponderal index and fetal malnutrition. Should head circumference/abdominal circumference ratio be abandoned? , 1991, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[10]  Reliability of Head Circumference Measurements in the Newborn , 1976, Clinical pediatrics.

[11]  S. Bhargava,et al.  Neonatal thigh circumference as an alternative indicator of low birth weight. , 1986, The Indian journal of medical research.

[12]  J. Excler,et al.  Anthropometric assessment of nutritional status in newborn infants. Discriminative value of mid arm circumference and of skinfold thickness. , 1985, Early human development.

[13]  J. Ballard,et al.  A simplified score for assessment of fetal maturation of newly born infants. , 1979, The Journal of pediatrics.

[14]  J. N. Sharma,et al.  Standard curves for mid arm circumference and mid-arm/head circumference ratio in newborns , 1990, Indian journal of pediatrics.

[15]  P. Meier,et al.  Reliability of weighing procedures for preterm infants. , 1989, Nursing research.

[16]  B A Baldwin,et al.  Maternal vocalisations and other sounds in the fetal lamb's sound environment. , 1985, Early human development.

[17]  J. N. Sharma,et al.  Thigh circumference at birth as the best predictor of low birth weight babies. , 1989, Indian pediatrics.

[18]  N. Paneth,et al.  The reliability of neonatal head circumference measurement. , 1991, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[19]  F. McLean,et al.  Intrauterine growth of live-born Caucasian infants at sea level: standards obtained from measurements in 7 dimensions of infants born between 25 and 44 weeks of gestation. , 1969, The Journal of pediatrics.

[20]  H. C. Miller,et al.  Diagnosis of impaired fetal growth in newborn infants. , 1971, Pediatrics.

[21]  H. Hoffman,et al.  Maternal risk factors and their influence on fetal anthropometric measurements. , 1993, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[22]  D. Gozal,et al.  Anthropometric measurements in a newborn population in west Africa: a reliable and simple tool for the identification of infants at risk for early postnatal morbidity. , 1991, The Journal of pediatrics.

[23]  M. Georgieff,et al.  Mid-arm circumference and mid-arm/head circumference ratios: standard curves for anthropometric assessment of neonatal nutritional status. , 1986, The Journal of pediatrics.

[24]  C. Eregie.  Arm/head ratio in the nutritional evaluation of newborn infants: a report of an African population. , 1992, Annals of Tropical Paediatrics.

[25]  N. Bishop,et al.  Linear growth in the early neonatal period. , 1990, Archives of Disease in Childhood.