Impact of interface state trap density on the performance characteristics of different III-V MOSFET architectures

Abstract The effect of interface state trap density, D it , on the current–voltage characteristics of four recently proposed III–V MOSFET architectures: a surface channel device, a flat-band implant-free HEMT-like device with δ -doping below the channel, a buried channel design with δ -doping, and implant-free quantum-well HEMT-like structure with no δ -doping, has been investigated using TCAD simulation tools. We have developed a methodology to include arbitrary energy distributions of interface states into the input simulation decks and analysed their impact on subthreshold characteristics and drive current. The distributions of interface states having high density tails that extend to the conduction band can significantly impact the subthreshold performance in both the surface channel design and the implant-free quantum-well HEMT-like structure with no δ -doping. Furthermore, the same distributions have little or no impact on the performance of both flat-band implant-free and buried channel architectures which operate around the midgap.

[1]  A. Asenov,et al.  Benchmarking of Scaled InGaAs Implant-Free NanoMOSFETs , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[2]  Asen Asenov,et al.  Effect of interface state trap density on the characteristics of n-type, enhancement-mode, implant-free In0.3Ga0.7As MOSFETs , 2009 .

[3]  R. Chau Benchmarking nanotechnology for high-performance and low-power logic transistor applications , 2004 .

[4]  Matthias Passlack,et al.  Development methodology for high-κ gate dielectrics on III–V semiconductors: GdxGa0.4−xO0.6∕Ga2O3 dielectric stacks on GaAs , 2005 .

[5]  Marc Heyns,et al.  Electrical study of sulfur passivated In0.53Ga0.47As MOS capacitor and transistor with ALD Al2O3 as gate insulator , 2009 .

[6]  Geert Hellings,et al.  Scalability of quantum well devices for digital logic applications , 2009 .

[7]  D. Nguyen,et al.  High mobility NMOSFET structure with high-/spl kappa/ dielectric , 2005, IEEE Electron Device Letters.

[8]  David J. Webb,et al.  In-situ MBE Si as passivating interlayer on GaAs for HfO2 MOSCAP's: effect of GaAs surface reconstruction , 2007 .

[9]  A. Asenov,et al.  Monte Carlo Simulations of High-Performance Implant Free In$_{0.3}$Ga $_{0.7}$As Nano-MOSFETs for Low-Power CMOS Applications , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology.

[10]  M. Passlack Methodology for Development of High-κ Stacked Gate Dielectrics on III–V Semiconductors , 2005 .

[11]  Alexander A. Demkov,et al.  Materials Fundamentals of Gate Dielectrics , 2005 .

[12]  M. Passlack,et al.  Implant-free high-mobility flatband MOSFET: principles of operation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[13]  P. Fejes,et al.  Electrical Properties of $\hbox{Ga}_{2}\hbox{O}_{3}/ \hbox{GaAs}$ Interfaces and GdGaO Dielectrics in GaAs-Based MOSFETs , 2009, IEEE Electron Device Letters.

[14]  A. Asenov,et al.  Enhancement-Mode GaAs MOSFETs With an $\hbox{In}_{0.3} \hbox{Ga}_{0.7}\hbox{As}$ Channel, a Mobility of Over 5000 $ \hbox{cm}^{2}/\hbox{V} \cdot \hbox{s}$, and Transconductance of Over 475 $\mu\hbox{S}/\mu\hbox{m}$ , 2007, IEEE Electron Device Letters.