Theoretical basis of the Beavis effect.

The core of statistical inference is based on both hypothesis testing and estimation. The use of inferential statistics for QTL identification thus includes estimation of genetic effects and statistical tests. Typically, QTL are reported only when the test statistics reach a predetermined critical value. Therefore, the estimated effects of detected QTL are actually sampled from a truncated distribution. As a result, the expectations of detected QTL effects are biased upward. In a simulation study, William D. Beavis showed that the average estimates of phenotypic variances associated with correctly identified QTL were greatly overestimated if only 100 progeny were evaluated, slightly overestimated if 500 progeny were evaluated, and fairly close to the actual magnitude when 1000 progeny were evaluated. This phenomenon has subsequently been called the Beavis effect. Understanding the theoretical basis of the Beavis effect will help interpret QTL mapping results and improve success of marker-assisted selection. This study provides a statistical explanation for the Beavis effect. The theoretical prediction agrees well with the observations reported in Beavis's original simulation study. Application of the theory to meta-analysis of QTL mapping is discussed.

[1]  C. Haley,et al.  A simple regression method for mapping quantitative trait loci in line crosses using flanking markers , 1992, Heredity.

[2]  J. Xu,et al.  A genetic map of Gibberella fujikuroi mating population A (Fusarium moniliforme). , 1996, Genetics.

[3]  R. Lande,et al.  Efficiency of marker-assisted selection in the improvement of quantitative traits. , 1990, Genetics.

[4]  Z. Zeng,et al.  Correcting the bias of Wright's estimates of the number of genes affecting a quantitative character: a further improved method. , 1992, Genetics.

[5]  M. Sillanpää,et al.  Bayesian mapping of multiple quantitative trait loci from incomplete inbred line cross data. , 1998, Genetics.

[6]  Z. Zeng Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci. , 1994, Genetics.

[7]  Ahmed Rebai,et al.  Power of tests for QTL detection using replicated progenies derived from a diallel cross , 1993, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[8]  Shizhong Xu,et al.  Correcting the Bias in Estimation of Genetic Variances Contributed by Individual QTL , 2003, Genetica.

[9]  Corbin D. Jones,et al.  Detecting the undetected: estimating the total number of loci underlying a quantitative trait. , 2000, Genetics.

[10]  M. Lynch,et al.  Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits , 1996 .

[11]  R. Jansen,et al.  Interval mapping of multiple quantitative trait loci. , 1993, Genetics.

[12]  M. Goddard,et al.  The distribution of the effects of genes affecting quantitative traits in livestock , 2001, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[13]  Shizhong Xu Estimating polygenic effects using markers of the entire genome. , 2003, Genetics.

[14]  R. Lande The minimum number of genes contributing to quantitative variation between and within populations. , 1981, Genetics.

[15]  A. Cohen Truncated and Censored Samples , 1991 .