PULSED DETONATION ENGINE PROCESSES: EXPERIMENTS AND SIMULATIONS

Computational and experimental investigations of a pulsed detonation engine (PDE) operating in a cycle using ethylene/air mixtures are reported. Simulations are performed for two geometry configurations, namely, an ideal tube PDE with a smooth wall fueled with premixed C2H4/O2 and a benchmark tube PDE with internal geometry and a valveless air supply fueled with C2H4. Performance estimates of fuel-specific impulse (Ispf) of an ideal tube PDE, obtained using a two-step reduced mechanism for a C2H4/O2 mixture, are in good agreement with existing test measurements from the literature. Realistic simulations of all processes of the PDE cycle (fill, deflagration-to-detonation transition (DDT), detonation propagation, blowdown, and purge) of a benchmark tube PDE yielded important insights into continuous cycle operation. Experimental measurements include DDT visualizations and dynamic pressure measurements. Comparisons of experimental and computational visualizations show good agreement in cycle process timescales. However, run-up distance is underpredicted, indicating a need to improve the flame propagation mechanism. The predicted decrease in the fuel-specific impulse (Ispf) for the benchmark tube when compared to the I spf of an ideal tube may be attributed to nonuniformities in the mixture composition, the pressure drop resulting from internal geometry, and backflow in the benchmark tube due to a compression wave propagating into the upstream geometry.

[1]  Kailas Kailasanath,et al.  Recent Developments in the Research on Pulse Detonation Engines , 2002 .

[2]  Joseph E. Shepherd,et al.  AN ANALYTICAL MODEL FOR THE IMPULSE OF A SINGLE-CYCLE PULSE DETONATION ENGINE , 2001 .

[3]  Forman A. Williams,et al.  Two-step chemical-kinetic descriptions for hydrocarbon–oxygen-diluent ignition and detonation applications , 2005 .

[4]  E. M. Bulewicz Combustion , 1964, Nature.

[5]  John H. S. Lee,et al.  On The Transition from Deflagration to Detonation , 1992 .

[6]  Joseph E. Shepherd,et al.  Direct Experimental Impulse Measurements for Detonations and Deflagrations , 2001 .

[7]  K. Kailasanath,et al.  The flowfield and performance of pulse detonation engines , 2002 .

[8]  Sukumar Chakravarthy,et al.  Some Recent Progress in Practical Computational Fluid Dynamics , 2001 .

[9]  Shmuel Eidelman,et al.  Pulsed detonation engine experimental and theoretical review , 1992 .

[10]  Gregory I. Sivashinsky,et al.  The transition from deflagration to detonation in thin channels , 2003 .

[11]  Christopher Brophy,et al.  Detonation studies of JP-10 with oxygen and air for pulse detonation engine development , 1998 .

[12]  Louis A. Povinelli,et al.  Real Gas Effects on the Performance of Hydrocarbon-fueled Pulse Detonation Engines , 2003 .

[13]  Vigor Yang,et al.  NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF DETONATION WITH DETAILED CHEMICAL KINETICS USING THE SPACE-TIME METHOD , 2000 .

[14]  D. Stewart,et al.  The transition from deflagration to detonation , 1981 .

[15]  Charles L. Merkle,et al.  Modeling of Pulse Detonation Engine Operation , 2001 .

[16]  Elaine S. Oran,et al.  Deflagrations, hot spots, and the transition to detonation , 1999, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[17]  Elaine S. Oran,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Deflagration-to-Detonation Transition: The Role of Shock-Flame Interactions in Turbulent Flames , 1999 .

[18]  John H. S. Lee CHAPTER 17 – Detonation Waves in Gaseous Explosives , 2001 .

[19]  F. Williams,et al.  Ethylene Ignition and Detonation Chemistry, Part 2: Ignition Histories and Reduced Mechanisms , 2002 .

[20]  K. Kailasanath Recent developments in the research on pulse detonation engines , 2002 .