Determinants of noise annoyance in teachers from schools with diffrent classroom reverberation times

Abstract A high proportion of school teachers report that they are disturbed by noise during teaching. The aim of the study was therefore to identify determinants of self-reported noise exposure and disturbance attributed to noise among secondary school teachers ( n  = 419) in 10 schools in Copenhagen, Denmark. The schools were selected to show contrasts in classroom reverberation times (RT), and were classified as “Short RT” (3 schools, mean RT 0.41–0.45 s), “Medium RT” (3 schools, mean RT 0.51–0.55 s) and “Long RT” (4 schools, mean RT 0.62–0.73 s). Significant determinants of self-reported noise exposure were a high number of children in the class, young age of the children, and low teacher seniority. “Long RT” classification was of borderline significance. Significant determinants of disturbance attributed to noise from children in the class were teacher seniority and “Long RT” acoustic classification of the school. The associations between work characteristics and noise disturbance measures were attenuated by low self-rated work capacity, suggesting that the consequences of noise and poor acoustics may not be limited to disturbance attributed to noise, but may have a wide negative impact on the perceived working environment.

[1]  A Kjellberg,et al.  Subjective, behavioral and psychophysiological effects of noise. , 1990, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[2]  J. S. Bradley,et al.  The intelligibility of speech in elementary school classrooms. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  H. Kraemer,et al.  How do risk factors work together? Mediators, moderators, and independent, overlapping, and proxy risk factors. , 2001, The American journal of psychiatry.

[4]  Anders Kjellberg,et al.  Recall of words heard in noise , 2008 .

[5]  Eva Boman,et al.  Noise annoyance responses of middle school pupils and teachers , 2004 .

[6]  John S. Bradley,et al.  Revisiting Speech Interference in Classrooms:Revisando la interferencia en el habla dentro del salón de clases , 2001 .

[7]  S Greenland,et al.  Re: "The impact of confounder selection criteria on effect estimation. , 1989, American journal of epidemiology.

[8]  A. Kjellberg Effects of reverberation time on the cognitive load in speech communication: theoretical considerations. , 2004, Noise & health.

[9]  R. Guski Personal and social variables as co-determinants of noise annoyance. , 1999, Noise & health.

[10]  Anders Kjellberg,et al.  Exposure levels, tonal components, and noise annoyance in working environments , 1995 .

[11]  L. L. Elliott Performance of children aged 9 to 17 years on a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence material with controlled word predictability. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  V Viljanen,et al.  Acoustic conditions for speech communication in classrooms. , 1991, Scandinavian audiology.

[13]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Indispensable benefits and unavoidable costs of unattended sound for cognitive functioning. , 2003, Noise & health.

[14]  A. Kjellberg,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF NONPHYSICAL NOISE CHARACTERISTICS, ONGOING TASK AND NOISE SENSITIVITY ON ANNOYANCE AND DISTRACTION DUE TO NOISE AT WORK , 1996 .

[15]  J. S. Bradley,et al.  Effects of room acoustics on the intelligibility of speech in classrooms for young children. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  A. Wikman,et al.  Reliability, Validity and True Values in Surveys , 2006 .

[17]  Carol Flexer,et al.  The Impact of Classroom Acoustics: Listening, Learning, and Literacy , 2004 .

[18]  A. Williamson Using self-report measures in neurobehavioural toxicology: can they be trusted? , 2007, Neurotoxicology.

[19]  J. Seidel,et al.  Effects of Classroom Acoustics on Performance and Well-Being in Elementary School Children: A Field Study , 2010 .

[20]  L L Elliott,et al.  Children's understanding of monosyllabic nouns in quiet and in noise. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  R. Ulrich,et al.  Acoustics and psychosocial environment in intensive coronary care , 2005, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[23]  Konca Saher,et al.  Effect of room absorption on human vocal output in multitalker situations. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  Julie E Dockrell,et al.  External and internal noise surveys of London primary schools. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  Anders Kjellberg,et al.  Long Reverberation Time Decreases Recall of Spoken Information , 2009 .

[26]  J. S. Bradley,et al.  Revisiting speech interference in classrooms. , 2001, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[27]  Anders Kjellberg,et al.  Poor Listening Conditions Impair Memory for Intelligible Lectures: Implications for Acoustic Classroom Standards , 2009 .

[28]  S P Banbury,et al.  Office noise and employee concentration: Identifying causes of disruption and potential improvements , 2005, Ergonomics.

[29]  E. Smith,et al.  Frequency of voice problems among teachers and other occupations. , 1998, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[30]  A. Schick,et al.  Contributions to psychological acoustics : results of the ... Oldenburg Symposium on Psychological Acoustics , 1986 .