Community of Practice for Knowledge Sharing in Higher Education: Analysing Community of Practice through the Lens of Activity Theory

Knowledge sharing is fundamental to learning among students. Learning and innovation occur when students are collaborating and able to share knowledge. Therefore students must be encouraged and be willing to share knowledge with one another. Although there are many benefits to knowledge sharing among students, in practice it is not easy to achieve. Communities of practice (COP) are an ideal platform for students to collaborate and share knowledge as they learn. However, creating and implementing an effective COP is not trivial. This paper describes our experience of using COP to promote knowledge sharing among undergraduate students working in a multicultural setting, analyses COP using activity theory, and outlines a design proposal for a COP using social objects.

[1]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[2]  Jer Yuen. Ting.  Information and knowledge sharing among undergraduate students in Singapore. , 2005 .

[3]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Perspectives on activity theory: Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice , 1999 .

[4]  Jakob E. Bardram,et al.  “I love the system—I just don't use it!” , 1997, GROUP.

[5]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[6]  Andreas Riege,et al.  Three-dozen knowledge-sharing barriers managers must consider , 2005, J. Knowl. Manag..

[7]  Jessica Keyes,et al.  Identifying the Barriers to Knowledge Sharing in Knowledge Intensive Organizations , 2008 .

[8]  Mustafa Eid,et al.  Impact of learning culture and information technology use on knowledge sharing of Saudi students , 2011 .

[9]  B. Nardi.  Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction , 1995 .

[10]  Peter Y. T. Sun,et al.  An investigation of barriers to knowledge transfer , 2005, J. Knowl. Manag..

[11]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Perspectives on activity theory: Play, learning, and instruction , 1999 .

[12]  D. Jonassen,et al.  Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments , 1999 .

[13]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research , 2014 .

[14]  Victor Kaptelinin,et al.  Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design , 2006, First Monday.

[15]  Victor Kaptelinin,et al.  Methods & tools: The activity checklist: a tool for representing the “space” of context , 1999, INTR.

[16]  Mehdi Khosrowpour,et al.  Emerging Trends And Challenges in Information Technology Management , 2006 .

[17]  L. Vygotsky.  Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[18]  A. Orders.  Cultivating communities of practice , 2013 .

[19]  Y. Engeström.  Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. , 2001 .