Use of reminders to increase compliance with tetanus booster vaccination.

OBJECTIVE To assess the effect of three computerized reminder systems on compliance with tetanus vaccination. DESIGN Prospective randomized controlled trial. SETTING Ottawa Civic Hospital Family Medicine Centre. PARTICIPANTS Of 8069 patients 20 years of age or more who were not in a hospital or institution 5589 were randomly assigned, by family, to a control group, a physician reminder group, a telephone reminder group or a letter reminder group. The remaining 2480 patients were not included in the randomized portion of the study but were monitored. Results are presented for the 5242 randomized patients and the 2369 nonrandomized patients for whom there was no up-to-date record of tetanus vaccination at the start of the trial. INTERVENTIONS For the patients in the physician reminder group the physician was reminded at an office visit to assess the patient's tetanus vaccination status and to recommend vaccination; those in the other two reminder groups received a telephone call or letter enquiring about their tetanus vaccination status and recommending a booster dose. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Proportion of patients who received tetanus toxoid during the study year or who had a claim of vaccination in the previous 10 years. MAIN RESULTS The rate of recorded tetanus vaccination in the randomized control group was 3.2%. The difference between that rate and those for the three reminder groups was 19.6% in the physician reminder group (95% confidence interval [CI] 17.1% to 22.2%, p less than 0.00001), 20.8% in the telephone reminder group (95% CI 18.3% to 23.5%, p less than 0.00001) and 27.4% in the letter reminder group (95% CI 24.8% to 30.2%, p less than 0.00001)). The letter reminders were more effective than either the telephone reminders (p = 0.00013) or the physician reminders (p less than 0.00001) in improving compliance. The cost to the practice per additional vaccination recorded was 43 for the physician reminders, $5.43 for the telephone reminders and $6.05 for the letter reminders. CONCLUSIONS Although all three reminder systems increased the rate of recorded tetanus vaccination they fell far short of achieving complete population coverage. More intensive interventions would be required to approach that goal. However, such interventions do not appear to be justified given the rarity of tetanus.

[1]  I McDowell,et al.  Computerized reminders to encourage cervical screening in family practice. , 1989, The Journal of family practice.

[2]  W. Manning,et al.  Preventive care: do we practice what we preach? , 1987, American journal of public health.

[3]  A. Dixon,et al.  Tetanus immunisation state in a general practice population. , 1988, BMJ.

[4]  L. Levine,et al.  Long-term immunity to diphtheria and tetanus: a mathematical model. , 1967, American journal of epidemiology.

[5]  H. Shannon,et al.  Effect of repeated annual reminder letters on influenza immunization among elderly patients. , 1991, The Journal of family practice.

[6]  K. J. Wagner Diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis: Guidelines for vaccine prophylaxis and other preventive measures , 1986 .

[7]  J. Mullooly Tetanus immunization of adult members of an HMO. , 1984, American journal of public health.

[8]  J. Feeley,et al.  Tetanus and diphtheria immunity in an elderly population in Los Angeles County. , 1983, American journal of public health.

[9]  W. Rosser,et al.  Use of reminders for preventive procedures in family medicine. , 1991, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[10]  G. Comstock,et al.  Validity of interview information in estimating community immunization levels. , 1973, Health services reports.

[11]  P. Fireman,et al.  Antitoxin responses in the elderly to tetanus-diphtheria (TD) immunization. , 1978, American journal of epidemiology.

[12]  L. Levine,et al.  Tetanus toxoid: what determines reaction proneness? , 1981, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[13]  K. Kjeldsen,et al.  IMMUNITY AGAINST TETANUS AND EFFECT OF REVACCINATION 25-30 YEARS AFTER PRIMARY VACCINATION , 1984, The Lancet.

[14]  D L Sackett,et al.  An assessment of clinically useful measures of the consequences of treatment. , 1988, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  S. Rubbo New approaches to tetanus prophylaxis. , 1966, Lancet.

[16]  L. Levine,et al.  Excessive use of tetanus toxoid boosters. , 1967, JAMA.

[17]  T. Muckle Cost-effectiveness of primary tetanus vaccination among elderly Canadians. , 1989, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[18]  W W Rosser,et al.  Software for family practice: a decade of development. , 1984, Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien.

[19]  M. W. Bentzon,et al.  Duration of immunity to diphtheria and tetanus after active immunization, with mention of non-conformity between haemagglutinating and neutralizing diphtheria antitoxin titers in some human sera. , 2009 .

[20]  K. Crossley,et al.  Tetanus and diphtheria immunity in urban Minnesota adults. , 1979, JAMA.

[21]  R. Sherwin,et al.  A serologic survey of tetanus and diphtheria immunity in New York City. , 1967, Archives of environmental health.

[22]  L. Levine,et al.  Tetanus-toxoid emergency boosters: a reappraisal. , 1969, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  L. Collier,et al.  REACTIONS AND ANTIBODY RESPONSES TO REINFORCING DOSES OF ADSORBED AND PLAIN TETANUS VACCINES , 1979, The Lancet.

[24]  G. Edsall Immunization of adults against diphtheria and tetanus. , 1952, American journal of public health and the nation's health.