Otoacoustic emission latency, cochlear tuning, and hearing functionality in neonates.

Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions of a large population of neonates (466 ears) are analyzed, with the aim of establishing if a significant latency difference can be observed between "pass" (333) and "fail" (133) ears, discriminated with a screening protocol based on band and global reproducibility. The ears that did not pass the test in at least one frequency band are named "fail," for simplicity, but they should be more appropriately defined as "partial pass." In a previous study, significantly different average latencies had been observed in adult subjects, comparing normal hearing and hearing impaired ears [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111, 297-308 (2002)], but no similar study has been conducted on neonates yet. An improved wavelet technique was applied to transient evoked otoacoustic emission data, to get accurate experimental measurements of the otoacoustic emission latency. The results show statistically significant differences between the latency distributions of the "pass" and "fail" populations, with the "fail" latencies longer. However, non-Gaussianity of the distributions and systematic errors associated with low reproducibility levels suggested using a conservative approach in the data analysis and interpretation. New otoacoustic estimates of cochlear tuning in neonates are also provided.

[1]  Piotr J Durka,et al.  Identification of otoacoustic emissions components by means of adaptive approximations. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Gabriella Tognola,et al.  Time-frequency distributions of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions , 1997, Hearing Research.

[3]  C. Talmadge,et al.  Ear canal reflectance in the presence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. I. Limit-cycle oscillator model. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  C. Abdala DPOAE suppression tuning: cochlear immaturity in premature neonates or auditory aging in normal-hearing adults? , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  R. Schoonhoven,et al.  Group delays of distortion product otoacoustic emissions: relating delays measured with f1- and f2-sweep paradigms. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Miriam Furst,et al.  Noise‐Induced Otoacoustic Emission Loss With or Without Hearing Loss , 1995, Ear and hearing.

[7]  S Kowalska,et al.  Measurements of click-evoked otoacoustic emission in industrial workers with noise-induced hearing loss. , 1997, International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health.

[8]  M P Gorga,et al.  Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions in Patients with Normal Hearing and in Patients with Hearing Loss , 1998, Ear and hearing.

[9]  G. Donaldson,et al.  Derived band auditory brain-stem response estimates of traveling wave velocity in humans. I: Normal-hearing subjects. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  G. Zweig,et al.  The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissions. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  R. Sisto,et al.  Modeling otoacoustic emissions by active nonlinear oscillators. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Christopher A Shera,et al.  Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  G. Long,et al.  Modeling otoacoustic emission and hearing threshold fine structures. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  C. Talmadge,et al.  Interrelations among distortion-product phase-gradient delays: their connection to scaling symmetry and its breaking. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  T. Janssen,et al.  Suppression tuning characteristics of the 2 f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in humans. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  A Theory for Multiresolution Signal Decomposition: The Wavelet Representation , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[17]  G. Tognola,et al.  Wavelet analysis of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  Andrew J. Oxenham,et al.  Estimates of Human Cochlear Tuning at Low Levels Using Forward and Simultaneous Masking , 2003, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[19]  D. D. Greenwood A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  F Grandori,et al.  Frequency-specific information from click evoked otoacoustic emissions in noise-induced hearing loss. , 1999, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[21]  Paul Avan,et al.  Wavelet analysis of real ear and synthesized click evoked otoacoustic emissions , 1994, Hearing Research.

[22]  Arturo Moleti,et al.  Objective estimates of cochlear tuning by otoacoustic emission analysis. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  R Probst,et al.  A review of otoacoustic emissions. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  Christopher A Shera,et al.  Stimulus-frequency-emission group delay: a test of coherent reflection filtering and a window on cochlear tuning. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  P Bray,et al.  An advanced cochlear echo technique suitable for infant screening. , 1987, British journal of audiology.

[26]  B. Vohr,et al.  Screening infants for hearing impairment. , 1996, The Journal of pediatrics.

[27]  M. Lutman,et al.  Methods for early identification of noise-induced hearing loss. , 1999, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[28]  R. Schoonhoven,et al.  DPOAE group delays versus electrophysiological measures of cochlear delay in normal human ears. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  R Sisto,et al.  On the frequency dependence of the otoacoustic emission latency in hypoacoustic and normal ears. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  R Sisto,et al.  On the detection of early cochlear damage by otoacoustic emission analysis. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  P. A. Dorn,et al.  Distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired human ears. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.