Morphological and developmental macroevolution: a paleontological perspective.

Evidence of the morphological evolution of metazoans has been preserved, in varying degrees of completeness, in the fossil record of the last 600 million years. Although extinction has been incessant at lower taxonomic levels, genomic comparisons among surviving members of higher taxa suggest that much of the developmental systems that pattern their bodyplans has been conserved from early in their history. Comparisons between the origin of morphological disparity in the record and patterns of genomic disparity among living taxa promise to be interesting. For example, Hox cluster composition varies among major taxa, and the fossil record suggests that many of the changes in Hox clusters may have been associated with late Neoproterozoic evolution among minute benthic vermiform clades, from which crown bilaterian phyla arose just before or during the Cambrian explosion. Study of genomic differences among crown classes and orders whosetiming and mode of origin can be inferred from morphological data inthefossil record should throw further light on the timing and mode of origin of genomic disparities.

[1]  C. Kenyon,et al.  A cluster of Antennapedia-class homeobox genes in a nonsegmented animal. , 1991, Science.

[2]  R. Krumlauf Hox Genes in Vertebrate Development Review , 1994 .

[3]  Daniel W. McShea,et al.  Detecting changes in morphospace occupation patterns in the fossil record: characterization and analysis of measures of disparity , 2001, Paleobiology.

[4]  Y L Wang,et al.  Zebrafish hox clusters and vertebrate genome evolution. , 1998, Science.

[5]  P. Wagner Testing evolutionary constraint hypotheses with early Paleozoic gastropods , 1995, Paleobiology.

[6]  K. Roy,et al.  Morphological approaches to measuring biodiversity. , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[7]  C. Kenyon,et al.  A homeotic gene cluster patterns the anteroposterior body axis of C. elegans , 1993, Cell.

[8]  Michael Foote,et al.  Morphological diversity in the evolutionary radiation of Paleozoic and post-Paleozoic crinoids , 1999, Paleobiology.

[9]  Sean B. Carroll,et al.  Hox genes in brachiopods and priapulids and protostome evolution , 1999, Nature.

[10]  J. Sepkoski,et al.  Rates of speciation in the fossil record. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[11]  David M. Raup On the early origins of major biologic groups , 1983 .

[12]  N. Patel,et al.  Crustacean appendage evolution associated with changes in Hox gene expression , 1997, Nature.

[13]  D. Jablonski Extinctions in the fossil record , 1994 .

[14]  M. Foote,et al.  Paleozoic record of morphologica diversity in blastozoan echinoderms. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Alwyn Williams,et al.  A Supra-Ordinal Classification of the Brachiopoda , 1996 .

[16]  M. Wills,et al.  Disparity as an evolutionary index: a comparison of Cambrian and Recent arthropods , 1994, Paleobiology.

[17]  U. Technau Brachyury, the blastopore and the evolution of the mesoderm , 2001, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[18]  James W. Valentine,et al.  PRELUDE TO THE CAMBRIAN EXPLOSION , 2002 .

[19]  M. Mckinney Extinction Vulnerability and Selectivity: Combining Ecological and Paleontological Views , 1997 .

[20]  A. Abzhanov,et al.  Chelicerate Hox genes and the homology of arthropod segments , 1999, Evolution & development.

[21]  R. Raff,et al.  Direct‐developing sea urchins and the evolutionary reorganization of early development , 1992, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[22]  A. Knoll,et al.  Three-dimensional preservation of algae and animal embryos in a Neoproterozoic phosphorite , 1998, Nature.

[23]  E. Herniou,et al.  Acoel flatworms: earliest extant bilaterian Metazoans, not members of Platyhelminthes. , 1999, Science.

[24]  J. Sepkoski,et al.  A factor analytic description of the Phanerozoic marine fossil record , 1981, Paleobiology.

[25]  M. Foote THE EVOLUTION OF MORPHOLOGICAL DIVERSITY , 1997 .

[26]  W. McGinnis,et al.  Shaping animal body plans in development and evolution by modulation of Hox expression patterns , 1998, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[27]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  Nonrandom extinction and the loss of evolutionary history. , 2000, Science.

[28]  A. Knoll,et al.  New Lu–Hf and Pb–Pb age constraints on the earliest animal fossils , 2002 .

[29]  S. Jensen,et al.  Trace fossils and substrates of the terminal Proterozoic–Cambrian transition: Implications for the record of early bilaterians and sediment mixing , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  I. Ruiz-Trillo,et al.  A phylogenetic analysis of myosin heavy chain type II sequences corroborates that Acoela and Nemertodermatida are basal bilaterians , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  M. Wills,et al.  Evolutionary correlates of arthropod tagmosis: scrambled legs , 1998 .

[32]  Christopher J. Lowe,et al.  Radical alterations in the roles of homeobox genes during echinoderm evolution , 1997, Nature.

[33]  P. Holland,et al.  The amphioxus Hox cluster: deuterostome posterior flexibility and Hox14 , 2000, Evolution & development.

[34]  I. Ruiz-Trillo,et al.  The Nemertodermatida are basal bilaterians and not members of the Platyhelminthes , 2002 .

[35]  Chen,et al.  Precambrian sponges with cellular structures , 1998, Science.

[36]  L. Ramsköld,et al.  New early Cambrian animal and onychophoran affinities of enigmatic metazoans , 1991, Nature.

[37]  D. Raup,et al.  Selectivity of end-Cretaceous marine bivalve extinctions. , 1995, Science.

[38]  J. W. Valentine,et al.  Fossils, molecules and embryos: new perspectives on the Cambrian explosion. , 1999, Development.

[39]  S. Jensen,et al.  A critical reappraisal of the fossil record of the bilaterian phyla , 2000, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[40]  P. Wagner,et al.  Patterns of morphologic diversification among the Rostroconchia , 1997, Paleobiology.

[41]  M. Wills Morphological Disparity: A Primer , 2001 .

[42]  D. Jablonski,et al.  Comparative ecology of bryozoan radiations; origin of novelties in cyclostomes and cheilostomes , 1997 .

[43]  S. Carroll,et al.  Early animal evolution: emerging views from comparative biology and geology. , 1999, Science.

[44]  E. Davidson,et al.  A comparative molecular approach to mesodermal patterning in basal deuterostomes: the expression pattern of Brachyury in the enteropneust hemichordate Ptychodera flava. , 1999, Development.

[45]  David Jablonski,et al.  Micro- and macroevolution: scale and hierarchy in evolutionary biology and paleobiology , 2000, Paleobiology.

[46]  S. Aparício,et al.  Vertebrate evolution: recent perspectives from fish. , 2000, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[47]  L. Issel-Tarver,et al.  Gene expression and larval evolution: changing roles of distal‐less and orthodenticle in echinoderm larvae , 2002, Evolution & development.

[48]  J. Gibert,et al.  Molecules and the body plan: the Hox genes of Cirripedes (Crustacea). , 1998, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[49]  D. Raup Biological extinction in earth history. , 1986, Science.

[50]  J. Sepkoski,et al.  Ten years in the library: new data confirm paleontological patterns , 1993, Paleobiology.

[51]  R M May,et al.  Extinction and the loss of evolutionary history. , 1997, Science.