Detection of coronary artery stenoses by low-dose, prospectively ECG-triggered, high-pitch spiral coronary CT angiography.

OBJECTIVES We sought to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a new prospectively electrocardiogram (ECG)-triggered high-pitch scan mode for coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA), which allows an effective dose of less than 1 mSv. BACKGROUND Coronary CTA provides increasingly reliable image quality, but the associated radiation exposure can be high. METHODS Seventy-five patients with suspected coronary artery disease and in sinus rhythm were screened for participation. After exclusion of 25 patients for body weight >100 kg or failure to lower heart rate to ≤ 60 beats/min, 50 patients were studied by prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral computed tomography (CT). Coronary CTA was performed using a dual-source CT system with 2 × 128 × 0.6-mm collimation, 0.28-s rotation time, a pitch of 3.4, 100-kVp tube voltage, and current of 320 mA. Data acquisition was prospectively triggered at 60% of the R-R interval and completed within 1 cardiac cycle. Diagnostic accuracy for detection of coronary artery stenoses ≥ 50% diameter stenosis was determined by comparison to invasive coronary angiography. Per-patient diagnostic performance was the primary form of analysis. RESULTS In all 50 patients (34 males, 59 ± 12 years of age), imaging was successful. For the detection of 16 patients with at least 1 coronary artery stenosis, CT demonstrated a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 79% to 100%) and specificity of 82% (95% CI: 65% to 93%). The positive predictive value was 72% (95% CI: 49% to 89%) and the negative predictive value was 100% (95% CI: 87% to 100%). Sensitivity was 100% (95% CI: 88% to 100%) and specificity was 94% (95% CI: 89% to 97%) on a per-vessel basis. Per-segment sensitivity was 92% (95% CI: 80% to 97%), and specificity was 98% (95% CI: 96% to 98%). Mean dose-length product for coronary CTA was 54 ± 6 mGy · cm, the effective dose was 0.76 ± 0.08 mSv (0.64 to 0.95 mSv). CONCLUSIONS In nonobese patients with a low and stable heart rate, prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral coronary CTA provides high diagnostic accuracy for the detection of coronary artery stenoses.

[1]  B. Hamm,et al.  Noninvasive Coronary Angiography by 320-Row Computed Tomography With Lower Radiation Exposure and Maintained Diagnostic Accuracy: Comparison of Results With Cardiac Catheterization in a Head-to-Head Pilot Investigation , 2009, Circulation.

[2]  Jörg Hausleiter,et al.  Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. , 2009, JAMA.

[3]  Dirk Ertel,et al.  Cardiac spiral dual-source CT with high pitch: a feasibility study , 2009, European Radiology.

[4]  Peter Wilde,et al.  Comparison of radiation doses from multislice computed tomography coronary angiography and conventional diagnostic angiography. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  J. Hausleiter,et al.  Tips to minimize radiation exposure. , 2008, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[6]  J. Paul,et al.  Strategies for reduction of radiation dose in cardiac multislice CT , 2007, European Radiology.

[7]  K. Kofoed,et al.  Prognostic value of absence or presence of coronary artery disease determined by 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2011, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[8]  Werner Bautz,et al.  Randomized comparison of 64-slice single- and dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography for the detection of coronary artery disease. , 2008, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[9]  L Desbiolles,et al.  Low-dose CT coronary angiography in the step-and-shoot mode: diagnostic performance , 2008, Heart.

[10]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition. , 2010, European heart journal.

[11]  Dieter Ropers,et al.  Image quality in a low radiation exposure protocol for retrospectively ECG-gated coronary CT angiography. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  Fuminari Tatsugami,et al.  Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. , 2007, European heart journal.

[13]  Thomas Flohr,et al.  High-pitch spiral acquisition: a new scan mode for coronary CT angiography. , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[14]  Radiation exposure from cardiac computed tomography. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[15]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in the non-invasive evaluation of significant coronary artery disease. , 2010, European heart journal.

[16]  Bernhard Bischoff,et al.  Feasibility of dual-source cardiac CT angiography with high-pitch scan protocols. , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[17]  Jiang Hsieh,et al.  Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose. , 2008, Radiology.

[18]  B. Chow,et al.  Prognostic value of 64-slice cardiac computed tomography severity of coronary artery disease, coronary atherosclerosis, and left ventricular ejection fraction. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  Matthew J. Walker,et al.  Prospectively gated axial CT coronary angiography: preliminary experiences with a novel low-dose technique , 2009, European Radiology.

[20]  K. Stierstorfer,et al.  First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system , 2006, European Radiology.

[21]  G. Feuchtner,et al.  Low-dose, 128-slice, dual-source CT coronary angiography: accuracy and radiation dose of the high-pitch and the step-and-shoot mode , 2010, Heart.

[22]  Jörg Hausleiter,et al.  Prognostic value of coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of cardiac events in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[23]  S. Abbara.  ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography , 2011 .

[24]  Kelley R Branch,et al.  Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 64-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose. , 2008, Radiology.

[25]  R. Gibbons.  ACC/AHA guideline for management of patients with chronic stable angina , 2003 .

[26]  K. Stierstorfer,et al.  Technical principles of dual source CT. , 2008, European journal of radiology.

[27]  R. Morin,et al.  Ionizing Radiation in Cardiac Imaging: A Science Advisory From the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiac Imaging of the Council on Clinical Cardiology and Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention , 2009, Circulation.

[28]  P. Boesiger,et al.  Low-dose CT and cardiac MR for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: accuracy of single and combined approaches , 2010, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[29]  Sankey V. Williams,et al.  ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with chronic stable angina--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina). , 2003, Circulation.

[30]  R. Fattori,et al.  Incremental Prognostic Value of Coronary CT Angiography in Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease , 2010, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[31]  J. Min,et al.  The prognostic value of multidetector coronary CT angiography for the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events: a multicenter observational cohort study , 2010, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[32]  G. Feuchtner,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of high-pitch dual-source CT for the assessment of coronary stenoses: first experience , 2009, European Radiology.

[33]  A. Einstein,et al.  Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. , 2007, JAMA.

[34]  V. Treyer,et al.  First head-to-head comparison of effective radiation dose from low-dose 64-slice CT with prospective ECG-triggering versus invasive coronary angiography , 2009, Heart.

[35]  Masanori Takada,et al.  Radiation dose reduction and coronary assessability of prospective electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography coronary angiography: comparison with retrospective electrocardiogram-gated helical scan. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[36]  G. Hillis,et al.  64-Slice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2008, Heart.

[37]  Fuminari Tatsugami,et al.  Accuracy of low-dose computed tomography coronary angiography using prospective electrocardiogram-triggering: first clinical experience. , 2008, European heart journal.

[38]  Arik Wolak,et al.  Algorithm for radiation dose reduction with helical dual source coronary computed tomography angiography in clinical practice. , 2008, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[39]  J. Min,et al.  ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American , 2010, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[40]  Willi A Kalender,et al.  Application- and patient size-dependent optimization of x-ray spectra for CT. , 2009, Medical physics.

[41]  Masao Kiguchi,et al.  Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality, stenosis, and radiation dose. , 2008, Radiology.

[42]  G. Feuchtner,et al.  Prospective and retrospective ECG-gating for CT coronary angiography perform similarly accurate at low heart rates. , 2011, European journal of radiology.