Hill-Robertson interference is a minor determinant of variations in codon bias across Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans genomes.

According to population genetics models, genomic regions with lower crossing-over rates are expected to experience less effective selection because of Hill-Robertson interference (HRi). The effect of genetic linkage is thought to be particularly important for a selection of weak intensity such as selection affecting codon usage. Consistent with this model, codon bias correlates positively with recombination rate in Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans. However, in these species, the G+C content of both noncoding DNA and synonymous sites correlates positively with recombination, which suggests that mutation patterns and recombination are associated. To remove this effect of mutation patterns on codon bias, we used the synonymous sites of lowly expressed genes that are expected to be effectively neutral sites. We measured the differences between codon biases of highly expressed genes and their lowly expressed neighbors. In D. melanogaster we find that HRi weakly reduces selection on codon usage of genes located in regions of very low recombination; but these genes only comprise 4% of the total. In C. elegans we do not find any evidence for the effect of recombination on selection for codon bias. Computer simulations indicate that HRi poorly enhances codon bias if the local recombination rate is greater than the mutation rate. This prediction of the model is consistent with our data and with the current estimate of the mutation rate in D. melanogaster. The case of C. elegans, which is highly self-fertilizing, is discussed. Our results suggest that HRi is a minor determinant of variations in codon bias across the genome.

[1]  M. Nordborg.  Linkage disequilibrium, gene trees and selfing: an ancestral recombination graph with partial self-fertilization. , 2000, Genetics.

[2]  J. Hey,et al.  Interactions between natural selection, recombination and gene density in the genes of Drosophila. , 2002, Genetics.

[3]  D C Shields,et al.  Evidence that mutation patterns vary among Drosophila transposable elements. , 1989, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  L. Duret,et al.  Does recombination improve selection on codon usage? Lessons from nematode and fly complete genomes , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  P. Keightley,et al.  Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sex. , 2000, Science.

[6]  Paul M. Sharp,et al.  Codon usage in Caenorhabditis elegans: delineation of translational selection and mutational biases , 1994, Nucleic Acids Res..

[7]  Alan Ashworth,et al.  Evolutionary rate of a gene affected by chromosomal position , 1999, Current Biology.

[8]  Adam Eyre-Walker,et al.  Mutation pressure, natural selection, and the evolution of base composition in Drosophila , 2004, Genetica.

[9]  J. Powell,et al.  Evolution of codon usage bias in Drosophila. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  E. Haag,et al.  Regulatory elements required for development of caenorhabditis elegans hermaphrodites are conserved in the tra-2 homologue of C. remanei, a male/female sister species. , 2000, Genetics.

[11]  Adam Eyre-Walker,et al.  Recombination and mammalian genome evolution , 1993, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  M. Aguadé,et al.  Natural selection on synonymous sites is correlated with gene length and recombination in Drosophila. , 1999, Genetics.

[13]  L. Duret,et al.  Expression pattern and, surprisingly, gene length shape codon usage in Caenorhabditis, Drosophila, and Arabidopsis. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  B. Tourancheau,et al.  Multiplicative versus additive selection in relation to genome evolution: a simulation study. , 2001, Genetical research.

[15]  L. Duret,et al.  GC-content evolution in mammalian genomes: the biased gene conversion hypothesis. , 2001, Genetics.

[16]  J. Berg.  Genome sequence of the nematode C. elegans: a platform for investigating biology. , 1998, Science.

[17]  J. Hey,et al.  The effects of mutation and natural selection on codon bias in the genes of Drosophila. , 1994, Genetics.

[18]  A. Nicolas,et al.  Clustering of meiotic double-strand breaks on yeast chromosome III. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  P. Bucher,et al.  Searching for regulatory elements in human noncoding sequences. , 1997, Current opinion in structural biology.

[20]  P. Sharp,et al.  Codon usage: mutational bias, translational selection, or both? , 1993, Biochemical Society transactions.

[21]  A. Clark,et al.  Local rates of recombination are positively correlated with GC content in the human genome. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[22]  L. Duret,et al.  tRNA gene number and codon usage in the C. elegans genome are co-adapted for optimal translation of highly expressed genes. , 2000, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[23]  W. G. Hill,et al.  The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection. , 1966, Genetical research.

[24]  G. McVean,et al.  The effects of Hill-Robertson interference between weakly selected mutations on patterns of molecular evolution and variation. , 2000, Genetics.

[25]  M. Bulmer.  The selection-mutation-drift theory of synonymous codon usage. , 1991, Genetics.

[26]  The organization of Drosophila genes. , 1994, DNA sequence : the journal of DNA sequencing and mapping.

[27]  J. Drake,et al.  Rates of spontaneous mutation. , 1998, Genetics.

[28]  J. Nickoloff,et al.  Efficient repair of all types of single-base mismatches in recombination intermediates in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Competition between long-patch and G-T glycosylase-mediated repair of G-T mismatches. , 1998, Genetics.

[29]  Etsuko N. Moriyama,et al.  Codon Usage Bias and tRNA Abundance in Drosophila , 1997, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[30]  Laurent Duret,et al.  Synonymous Codon Usage, Accuracy of Translation, and Gene Length in Caenorhabditis elegans , 2001, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[31]  Stephen M. Mount,et al.  The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. , 2000, Science.

[32]  W Krone,et al.  An isochore transition in the NF1 gene region coincides with a switch in the extent of linkage disequilibrium. , 2000, American journal of human genetics.

[33]  Emmanuelle Lerat,et al.  Codon Usage by Transposable Elements and Their Host Genes in Five Species , 2002, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[34]  Etsuko N. Moriyama,et al.  Gene length and codon usage bias in Drosophila melanogaster, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Escherichia coli , 1998, Nucleic Acids Res..

[35]  D C Shields,et al.  "Silent" sites in Drosophila genes are not neutral: evidence of selection among synonymous codons. , 1988, Molecular biology and evolution.

[36]  A. Nicolas,et al.  Recombination at work for meiosis. , 1998, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[37]  D. Hartl,et al.  Selection intensity for codon bias. , 1994, Genetics.

[38]  T. Takano-Shimizu.  Local changes in GC/AT substitution biases and in crossover frequencies on Drosophila chromosomes. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[39]  J. Hey,et al.  Reduced natural selection associated with low recombination in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1993, Molecular biology and evolution.

[40]  Andrew Smith.  Genome sequence of the nematode C-elegans: A platform for investigating biology , 1998 .

[41]  Stephen M. Mount,et al.  Splicing signals in Drosophila: intron size, information content, and consensus sequences. , 1992, Nucleic acids research.

[42]  H. Akashi,et al.  Inferring weak selection from patterns of polymorphism and divergence at "silent" sites in Drosophila DNA. , 1995, Genetics.

[43]  A. Coulson,et al.  Meiotic recombination, noncoding DNA and genomic organization in Caenorhabditis elegans. , 1995, Genetics.

[44]  P. Deloukas,et al.  Comparison of human genetic and sequence-based physical maps , 2001, Nature.

[45]  J. Felsenstein.  The evolutionary advantage of recombination. , 1974, Genetics.

[46]  M. A. van der Horst,et al.  Single nucleotide polymorphisms in wild isolates of Caenorhabditis elegans. , 2000, Genome research.

[47]  P. Brown,et al.  Global mapping of meiotic recombination hotspots and coldspots in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  F. Lisacek,et al.  Codon usage and gene function are related in sequences of Arabidopsis thaliana. , 1998, Gene.

[49]  P. Andolfatto.  Contrasting patterns of X-linked and autosomal nucleotide variation in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[50]  Z. Yang,et al.  Substitution rates in Drosophila nuclear genes: implications for translational selection. , 2001, Genetics.

[51]  C. Biémont,et al.  Codon usage and the origin of P elements. , 2000, Molecular biology and evolution.

[52]  L. Hurst,et al.  The elevated GC content at exonic third sites is not evidence against neutralist models of isochore evolution. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[53]  P. Andolfatto,et al.  A genome-wide departure from the standard neutral model in natural populations of Drosophila. , 2000, Genetics.

[54]  J. Jiricny,et al.  Different base/base mispairs are corrected with different efficiencies and specificities in monkey kidney cells , 1988, Cell.

[55]  C. Fields,et al.  Information content of Caenorhabditis elegans splice site sequences varies with intron length. , 1990, Nucleic acids research.