Optimal Selection of Control Surfaces for Active Aeroelastic Control of Prescribed Modes

Efficient distribution of control through actuating control surfaces plays a critical role in designing the optimal active aeroelastic control. A wing planform may consist of multiple control surfaces which may be used to facilitate certain desired control objectives such as suppression of flutter instabilities, flutter boundary extension and gust load alleviation. This leads to the design of control surfaces for facilitating the desired control while still satisfying the sizing constraints of the control surfaces and other cost functions i.e. controller norms and actuator saturation. Wing configurations having multiple control surfaces also present an opportunity to select “an optimal combination of control surfaces” which can satisfy the control objective. Moreover, the aeroelastic structures have an inherently large number of modes, therefore it is desired to design a controller for some targeted modes without affecting any other aeroelastic modes. In this research, these two aspects of active aeroelastic control are considered. An investigation of the optimal placement of control surfaces is considered such that a prescribed flutter boundary extension is achieved for a given flight envelope by controlling only a few targeted modes. A multi-input state feedback controller based on the method of receptances is designed for controlling the targeted modes of interest. Several performance measures are developed for identifying the optimal placement of control surfaces which also satisfies the dynamic constraint of pole placement for a desired flutter boundary extension. Numerical examples involving multi-mode wing models having multiple control surfaces are presented to highlight the effectiveness of a controller with the optimal placement of control surfaces.

[1]  Edward Burnett,et al.  Conceptual Design of a Multi-utility Aeroelastic Demonstrator , 2010 .

[2]  G. Obinata,et al.  Optimal Sensor/actuator Placement for Active Vibration Control Using Explicit Solution of Algebraic Riccati Equation , 2000 .

[3]  S Buttrill Carey,et al.  Aeroservoelastic Simulation of an Active Flexible Wing Wind Tunnel Model , 1996 .

[4]  Kumar Vikram Singh,et al.  Optimization of Control Surface Parameters with Augmented Flutter Boundary Constraints , 2014 .

[5]  L H Yam,et al.  Optimal design of number and locations of actuators in active vibration control of a space truss , 2002 .

[6]  M. Tarokh Measures for controllability, observability and fixed modes , 1992 .

[7]  Jonathan E. Cooper,et al.  Active Aeroelastic Control Using the Receptance Method , 2010 .

[8]  Anoop K. Dhingra,et al.  OPTIMAL PLACEMENT OF ACTUATORS IN ACTIVELY CONTROLLED STRUCTURES , 1994 .

[9]  Raymond M. Kolonay,et al.  Receptance-Based Active Aeroelastic Control with Embedded Control Surfaces Having Actuator Dynamics , 2016 .

[10]  Jonathan E. Cooper,et al.  Introduction to Aircraft Aeroelasticity and Loads , 2007 .

[11]  A. Arbel Controllability measures and actuator placement in oscillatory systems , 1981 .

[12]  Eli Livne,et al.  Integrated Aeroservoelastic Optimization: Status and Direction , 1999 .

[13]  W. Gawronski,et al.  Balanced actuator and sensor placement for flexible structures , 1996 .

[14]  Peter J Seiler,et al.  Model Reduction for Aeroservoelastic Systems , 2014 .

[15]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  Multiple-input active vibration control by partial pole placement using the method of receptances , 2013 .

[16]  Kumar Vikram Singh,et al.  Optimal Sizing and Configurations of the Control Surfaces for Active Aeroelastic Control , 2015 .

[17]  Laura A. McDonough Receptance Based Control of Aeroelastic Systems for Flutter Suppression , 2012 .

[18]  Antonio De La Garza,et al.  GLA and Flutter Suppression for a SensorCraft Class Concept Using System Identification , 2008 .

[19]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  Receptance Method in Active Vibration Control , 2006 .

[20]  Wodek Gawronski Actuator and sensor placement for structural testing and control , 1997 .

[21]  M. Karpel Procedures and Models for Aeroservoelastic Analysis and Design , 2001 .

[22]  M. Athans,et al.  Optimal control-surface locations for flexible aircraft , 1971 .

[23]  Dong-Ho Lee,et al.  Multi-Objective and Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of Supersonic Fighter Wing , 2006 .

[24]  Carlos S. Kubrusly,et al.  Sensors and controllers location in distributed systems - A survey , 1985, Autom..

[25]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Aeroservoelastic Design Optimization of a Flexible Wing , 2012 .

[26]  A. Hamdan,et al.  Measures of Modal Controllability and Observability for First- and Second-Order Linear Systems , 1989 .

[27]  Jonathan E. Cooper,et al.  Receptance-Based Active Aeroelastic Control Using Multiple Control Surfaces , 2014 .

[28]  Youdan Kim,et al.  Optimal wing planform design for aeroelastic control , 2000 .

[29]  Eli Livne,et al.  Integrated Aeroservoelastic Design Optimization of Actively-Controlled Strain-Actuated Flight Vehicles , 2014 .

[30]  Vivek Mukhopadhyay,et al.  Flutter suppression control law design and testing for the active flexible wing , 1995 .