Performance, energy and cost evaluation of a nanofiltration plant operated at elevated temperatures

Abstract The influence of temperature on cost and energy consumption during nanofiltration has been evaluated. The effect of temperature on pressure drop, fouling, concentration polarisation and changes in the membrane performance were evaluated experimentally and theoretically. Nanofiltration experiments using pure solutions and wastewater from the meat industry were performed at 25 and 55 °C with an Alfa Laval NFT-50 nanofiltration membrane. The results showed that the flux was slightly higher during wastewater concentration at 55 than at 25 °C. The difference was smaller than expected and is explained by both fouling and changes in the membrane performance due to the combined effects of pH and temperature. The concentration polarisation was found to be less at the higher temperature, as predicted by theory. However, this effect was small in comparison to the effect of temperature on fouling and the membrane performance. The influence of cleaning procedure on flux and retention was very dependent on the processing temperature due to time- and temperature-dependent changes in the membrane performance. Nanofiltration plants designed to run at 25 and 55 °C were dimensioned based on the results of the pilot study. Nanofiltration at 55 °C was found to be slightly better with respect to the investment cost. The energy required for pumping was lower at 55 °C. However, the energy required for heating is high and processing at 55 °C is only advantageous if the feed is already warm, if there is excess heat in the factory, or if the heat can be recycled.

[1]  Mika Mänttäri,et al.  Effect of temperature and membrane pre-treatment by pressure on the filtration properties of nanofiltration membranes☆ , 2002 .

[2]  Marcel Mulder,et al.  Basic Principles of Membrane Technology , 1991 .

[3]  J. Palmeri,et al.  Effect of temperature on the transport of water and neutral solutes across nanofiltration membranes. , 2007, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[4]  Rajamani Krishna,et al.  Mass Transfer in Multicomponent Mixtures , 2006 .

[5]  M. Teixeira,et al.  The role of membrane charge on nanofiltration performance , 2005 .

[6]  R. L. Riley,et al.  Transport properties of cellulose acetate osmotic membranes , 1965 .

[7]  Eli Oklejas,et al.  Minimizing RO energy consumption under variable conditions of operation , 2003 .

[8]  K. Östergren,et al.  The influence of different kinds of pre-treatment on the performance of a polyamide nanofiltration membrane , 2006 .

[9]  C. Bennett,et al.  Momentum, Heat, and Mass Transfer , 1962 .

[10]  Sirshendu De,et al.  Prediction of mass-transfer coefficient with suction in the applications of reverse osmosis and ultrafiltration , 1997 .

[11]  A. Foord.  Book reviewA guide to capital cost estimation: Institution of Chemical Engineers, London, 1969, 67 pp. Price: £1.20 (non-members), 80p (members), 40p (students). , 1971 .

[12]  K. Östergren,et al.  The influence of sodium chloride on mass transfer in a polyamide nanofiltration membrane at elevated temperatures , 2006 .

[13]  S. Nisan,et al.  A new method for the treatment of the reverse osmosis process, with preheating of the feedwater , 2005 .

[14]  Robert Buckingham,et al.  New techniques for extreme conditions: high temperature reverse osmosis and nanofiltration , 1996 .